As described in the Response to [the Medium story] 'How to talk to people you disagree with',” this post is not meant to be confrontational, as it is with the methodology of debates under the Primacy of the Parts. Instead we meant the methodology of the [generative] dialogue under the Primacy of the Whole. The diference between debate and [generative] dialogue in the response to the Medium story has this image:
As can be seen in the following images, the World Economic Forum is using the debate methodology of the Primacy of the Parts while asking to "Put a question to a Davos leader," which is divided into 11 parts that underlie their Fourth Industrial Revolution paradigm.
That's exactly what's described in the debate methodology of the Primacy of the Parts on the transition scenario of the post Was the Smart Grid 2025 a transition scenario? Do we need a transformation scenario?, to which we suggest to look at the following two images, the first of which introduces the must read Medium story Can “Long live politics!” dissolve WEF’s fractured world where “Politics is dead”?: