Welcome to the new Energy Central — same great community, now with a smoother experience. To login, use your Energy Central email and reset your password.

Dashboards Won’t Fix Utility Operations; A Business Outcomes Platform Will

In the utility world, dashboards are often seen as a sign of digital maturity.  They have become a sort of default response to digitization. We implement new systems, connect meters, pull in data, and then visualize it. And that’s how everything falls into place, isn’t it? 

But here’s the problem: Dashboards don’t drive outcomes.

They describe what happened, highlight what went wrong, and sometimes even look great on a screen in the control room. 

But what they rarely do is take the next step: turning insight into action. And at the speed their operations demand. They are visually pleasing, but they do not drive KPIs. Dashboards by themselves do not identify hidden losses, or prevent outages. 

A lesson for utilities to keep in mind: Dashboards Are Passive. Operations Are Not.

In all my conversations with utility ops teams, there is a familiar story. “We have the data, but we’re still relying on someone to notice a pattern, interpret it, escalate it, and then act.”

That process is slow. It’s manual. And it’s error-prone.

Another statement that stayed with me: “We don’t need to see more, but rather need the system to do more.” Sometimes, utility decisions have to be made in minutes, even seconds. In those scenarios, this sort of latency kills impact.

Dashboards or analytics solutions do support retrospective decision-making, but field and Ops teams function in a forward-looking environment. Post-facto dashboards are good for static observation checks, but not enough for active monitoring. 

The truth is, dashboards were built for reporting, not response. They’re fantastic tools for trend analysis, executive overviews, or regulatory compliance. But they’re not built for field decisions. Not for outage triaging. Not for theft detection. Not for fixing a failing feeder before it triggers downtime.

Operations move faster than that. And the technology stack needs to keep up.

Beyond Monitoring: The Case for a Real-Time Intelligence Layer

What utilities need now is a layer that listens, thinks, and acts; one that consumes real-time data from smart meters and other sources, makes sense of it, and drives workflows automatically. A middle layer that operates in the background: processing data, interpreting patterns, and creating the right response in real-time. And all without human intervention. 

Let’s call it what it is: a real-time operational intelligence layer.

This layer doesn’t just display data. It connects it.

It correlates usage anomalies with billing records.

It flags communication failures in near real-time.

It identifies clusters of alerts that point to deeper systemic issues.

Think of it as a digitally powered central nervous system: processing high-frequency, high-telemetry data from AMI, IoT, and SCADA systems.

More importantly, it routes those insights to the right team, at the right time, with the context needed to act. Think of it as adding a new talent to your organization. One that analyzes, coordinates operations, and accelerates decisions, with flawless precision. 

From Anomaly to Audit: Operation Intelligence in Action

We will explore a scenario here. 

Let’s say a segment of commercial meters in an area or zone suddenly reports an unusual consumption drop. It’s subtle; too subtle for the human eye to spot casually in a report.

Your dashboard might show a dip.

Your BI tool might let you build a query and filter it out.

But what happens in the case of a real-time intelligence layer? 

It sees the pattern as it emerges, cross-checks it with historical norms, checks billing records, and automatically generates an internal audit workflow. 

The result? Your field teams are instantly notified. A verification visit is automatically scheduled. The issue is resolved before it becomes a month-long loss. And there are more possible scenarios like this. Power quality events, outage diagnostics, transformer loading issues, billing anomalies - you name it. With a real time intelligence layer, these events no longer stay buried. They are identified and resolved. Before it takes a toll on your organization’s wallet.

This is not “nice to have” anymore. It’s how modern utility operations should and must work.

Manual Monitoring is in the Past: Let Systems Do the Watching 

We don’t need more people watching screens. What we need is fewer people waiting for the data to tell them something useful. Manual monitoring, no doubt, has proven to be useful in the past. In the current landscape, however, it tends to create friction in business workflows and processes.  

Gaps are created, money is lost, time is wasted, and in several scenarios, consumer trust is eroded.

The solution?  Systems should do the watching. They should do the correlating. And when they find something worth acting on, they should push that insight where it matters: into billing, into field ops, into customer care. Readers must note that it is not about replacing people. Rather, it is empowering them to act with confidence and precision.

That’s the promise of operational intelligence: fewer delays, tighter workflows, and better outcomes across the board.

Embedding Intelligence: The Missing Layer in the Utility Stack

Most utilities today have four layers in their digital infrastructure:

1. Device Layer – Meters, sensors, edge devices

2. Data Layer – Head-end systems, MDMS, databases

3. Visualization Layer – Dashboards, BI tools

4. Action Layer – Field teams, billing departments, command centers

But what’s missing is the intelligence layer that sits in the middle: the one that interprets data in real time and pushes actions across systems. A central nervous system, like the human brain. One that correctly interprets sensory inputs and commands a muscle memory response within the utility infrastructure. 

Think of it as an engine that understands context and follows a semantic approach. It enriches data with metadata (consumer segmentation or geospatial), normalizes event types across systems, and auto-triggers workflows based on each department’s KPIs. For example, a case of a voltage sag alert will translate into a SMS (to be sent to the customer),  a maintenance ticket, and transformer audit. And yes, all of this will depend on existing established business rules and set priority queues.  

This is what we call a Business Outcomes Platform.

It’s not a dashboard.

It’s not a reporting tool.

It’s the connective tissue that translates raw data into meaningful action at scale, across departments.

What Should a Business Outcomes Platform Include?

A Business Outcomes Platform isn’t a single tool, it’s a coordinated layer made up of components that work together to translate operational data into measurable results. A solution that embodies a no-code workflow and seamlessly integrates with existing utility systems. 

Here’s what an ideal business outcomes platform should include:

1. Live Data Stream Processing: Ingests and analyzes data from AMI systems, sensors, and other sources in near real-time. Not batch-mode.

2. Event Detection & Anomaly Engine: Identifies unusual patterns, exceptions, and business rule violations automatically, and learns over time.

3. Contextual Decision Layer: Correlates events across systems (e.g., billing, metering, GIS) to understand what’s happening and what matters most.

4. Trigger-Based Workflow Engine: Converts events into tasks, tickets, escalations, or automated actions, integrating directly with field service and billing platforms.

5. Cross-Department Integration: Connects with core operational systems (CIS, MDMS, SCADA, FSM) so that insights flow into action, not just reports.

6. Outcome Visibility & Feedback Loop: Tracks the results of actions taken — so teams can see what worked, improve what didn’t, and quantify business impact.

This isn’t just a theory on paper. It is the system architecture that utilities need to operationalize AMI data into something more scalable, resilient, and outcome-driven. 

And the play doesn’t end there. System efficiency metrics, like first time fix rate, field response, etc, must be fed back into utility decision trees. An outcome tracking model that evolves into a self-correcting model is the true goal.

The Time for Action-Driven Platforms Starts Now. 

Every utility today is under pressure to reduce losses, improve reliability, adapt to DER, meet regulatory demands, and engage customers better. And almost all of them already have the data they need. However, an active operation framework is more than a solution that informs and provides visibility. It demands a system that acts and intervenes when needed.

That’s what the business outcomes platform is about. It is not a far-fetched futuristic vision: it is a present-day imperative. 

Not more screens. Not more reports.

Just results. Faster. Smarter.

1 reply