This special interest group is for professionals to connect and discuss all types of carbon-free power alternatives, including nuclear, renewable, tidal and more.

Kellie  Didigu's picture
Communications Officer , DC Public Service Commission

I am the Communications Officer for the Public Service Commission of the District of Columbia.  I serve as agency lead for strategic communications efforts to increase brand awareness, elevate...

  • Member since 2020
  • 2 items added with 353 views
  • Jul 9, 2021

The DC Public Service Commission's latest report on the different fuels or energy sources that electricity suppliers use to generate electricity in the District shows that more than 12% of electricity sold in the city comes from renewable energy sources. Greenhouse gas emissions are also significantly down. Read the Biennial Report on Fuel Mix.

Matt Chester's picture
Matt Chester on Jul 9, 2021

The U.S. average hovers around 20%-- though that's bolstered by wider areas where resources like hydropower come into play, whereas of course DC is an urban environment. Do you know how the 12% figure compares with other cities of DC's size? 

Kellie  Didigu's picture
Kellie Didigu on Jul 9, 2021

We do not have any available data to compare DC to other cities.  Most of the information is usually at the state level. However, the District continues to achieve meaningful progress on its renewable energy goals and remains a recognized leading jurisdiction within the larger PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. regional grid, which includes 13 states and the District. For calendar year 2020, based on the specific fuel mix reports provided by the retail electricity suppliers, including Pepco’s standard offer service, the suggested fuel mix for the District appears to reflect an overall renewable energy component of over 12% of the total energy sold in the District — in contrast to the PJM System Mix of roughly 6%.

Matt Chester's picture
Matt Chester on Jul 9, 2021

Thanks for the follow up! I lived in DC until two years ago and I was always appreciative of how much clean energy was a focus in the district. Keep up the great work!

Bob Meinetz's picture
Bob Meinetz on Jul 11, 2021

Kellie, DC appears to be using the same false accounting used by many other cities (and states) to double the amount of renewable resources actually providing power to the district.

The law is clear:

"The Retail Electric Competition and Consumer Protection Act of 1999 requires the Public Service Commission of the District of Columbia (“DCPSC”) to report...the amount of electricity sold in the District that comes from renewable sources..."

Its explanation of DCPSC's compliance with the law is a convoluted, unintelligible mess, however, and that seems to be the point - through obfuscation, to exaggerate the amount of renewable electricity being consumed in DC.

The overall quantity of electricity coming from renewable sources, unfortunately for DC and other districts engaging in this deception, is not that difficult to determine: it's exactly the same as the grid to which its connected, plus any renewable electricity generated within district limits. So-called "renewable energy credits," or RECs, do not count - and here's why.

Imagine a track and field event where the winner of a certain competition wins a gold medal - she crossed the finish line first. However, the runner in 4th place, due to personal challenges, was unable to train before the event. So organizers have decided to allow the winner to sell the "attributes" of winning the event in the form of a certificate, a "Triumph Certificate", if you will. By buying these attributes, the 4th place finisher will go in the record books as the winner. She is permitted to claim being the winner, to hang the certificate on her wall, accept endorsements for vitamin pills, appear in motivational videos, etc., and profit from her false accomplishment without the possibility of prosecution. There is no doubt who actually won the event, of course, so the true winner also accepts endorsements for training devices, etc., to profit from her real accomplishment.

In an identical manner, this is how DCPSC is double counting its clean energy consuumption with RECs - the only difference being public ignorance of energy, combined with obfuscation ("Tier 1 and Tier 2 certificates", etc.) permits DCPSC to get away with it.

Interestingly, the author of the report lets the truth slip out here:

"...the suggested fuel mix for the District appears to reflect an overall renewable energy component of over 12% of the total energy sold in the District — in contrast to the PJM System Mix of roughly 6%."

Again, DCSPC's fuel mix is exactly the same as PJMs, the only difference being any renewable energy generated from within. But then the report reveals

"It should be noted that the DCPSC has not independently verified the fuel mix representations made by the suppliers."

Translation: "We use half as much renewable energy as we say we do from outside the district, and we don't verify what's generated inside." Bottom line: DCPSC is using half as much renewable electricity as it claims, and though some may be fooled by its report, nature is never fooled.

Kellie  Didigu's picture
Thank Kellie for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »