Part of Energy Management Network »
Load Management Group
In partnership with PLMA, this group is for practitioners from energy utilities, solution providers, and trade allies to share load management expertise and explore innovative approaches to program delivery, pricing constructs, and technology adoption.
Post
Who Turned Off The Lights?
When things get tight, it falls on the shift manager at the CAISO control room to decide what needs to be done. S/he usually does not have the luxury to consult with anyone, nor needs to seek anyone’s permission. If the available supply is deemed to be insufficient to meet the demand, some load must be shed, instantaneously, to avoid a cascading blackout – the worst-case scenario that all grid operators are keen to avoid at all cost. And that is what essentially happened on 14 and 15 Aug at CAISO.
.png)
Speaking at a 16 Sept BERC webinar, Berkeley Prof. Severin Borenstein, who also happens to be a member of the board of Governors of CAISO, explained how on a hot day on 14 Aug CAISO ordered the utility distribution companies (UDCs) to shed 500 MW of load at 6:36 pm, followed by an additional 500 MW ten minutes later (table on right). This happened at a time when the demand on the CAISO network was around 45 GW. In other words, CAISO was short by 1,000 MW or roughly 2%.
By 7:56 pm, roughly an hour later, “Load decreased and resources were adequate to meet CAISO’s load and contingency reserve obligations” – at which point the UDCs were ordered to restore power to all customers.
On the following day, Saturday 15 Aug, 470 MW were shed at 6:25 pm with the contingency over by 6:47 pm – lasting a mere 22 minutes. This time, the load shed was roughly 1% of demand on the network.
But why was there a shortage of supplies in the first place?
While the details are still under investigation, preliminary data from CAISO suggests that the culprits were not variable renewables but the sudden loss of 475 MW of generation at a supposedly dependable fossil fuel plant that got CAISO into an unexpected bind. On 15 Aug, human error was apparently the cause of the shortage – an operator erroneously reduced output by 400 MW rather than increasing it. In neither case can renewables be blamed for shortages based on what is presently known.
Boresntein points out that the episode, while serious, could have been far worse. Moreover, as the climate gets warmer and summers get drier and longer, CAISO will face tight supplies in the future. The list of solutions, immediate and longer-term, include the usual suspects.
.png)
Most important, is what is at stake. Had CAISO experienced a widespread blackout, the repercussions would have been severe and not just for California but the future of renewables worldwide. The California power shortages of 2000-01 derailed plans to introduce retail competition across the US. A similar, or worse, could happen to renewables if the lights go out again.
This article originally appeared in the September 2020 issue of EEnergy Informer, a monthly newsletter edited by Fereidoon Sioshansi who may be reached at fpsioshansi@aol.com"
https://drive.google.com/file/d/10A6xmdsumUfFsbwESZSevH-GOFQWz1Wn/view
Thank Fereidoon P. for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
Get Published - Build a Following
The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.
If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.
Your access to Member Features is limited.
Sign in to Participate