This group brings together the best thinkers on energy and climate. Join us for smart, insightful posts and conversations about where the energy industry is and where it is going.


Sweden's Quest to be the First Oil-free Nation

Zana Nesheiwat's picture
Fuel Freedom Foundation
  • Member since 2018
  • 5 items added with 6,858 views
  • Apr 11, 2013

SwedenFamous for Volvo, Ikea and Absolut Vodka, Sweden is now on a new pursuit to become the first completely oil-free economy in the world by 2020.

The oil crisis in the early 1970s forced Sweden to embark on a quest for alternative energy sources. Its phasing out of oil has proceeded smoothly; in 1970, oil accounted for 77% of Sweden’s energy, but by 2003 that figure fell to 32%.

According to the energy committee of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, there is growing concern among nations that global oil supplies are peaking and will soon become scarce, causing the price of oil to skyrocket. Committee members predict that a global economic recession could ensue, and Sweden is taking action to make its economy less vulnerable.

“Our dependency on oil should be broken by 2020,” said Mona Sahlin, former minister of Sustainable Development, in an interview with The Guardian newspaper. “There shall always be better alternatives to oil, which means no house should need oil for heating, and no driver should need to turn solely to gasoline.”


The Renewable Energy Directive (RED) requires 10% of Europe’s fossil fuel in transport to be replaced with liquid biofuels by 2020. The majority of biofuel produced is sold as a low-admixture (ethanol and biodiesel) to fuel companies for blending with fossil fuel. The blending ratio is 5% biofuel to 95% fossil fuel. About 80% of low-admixture ethanol is imported from Brazil.

In 2006, the government passed a “pump law” to require larger Swedish fuel stations (selling more than 3,000 cubic meters of gas or diesel per year) to provide a replacement fuel option. Also, starting in 2009, all small stations that sell more than 1,000m3 per year were required to meet the same standard.

Of the European member states, Sweden has one of the highest shares of renewable energy in transport with 5.4% in 2009. One-fifth of the cars in Stockholm can run on alternative fuels, primarily ethanol. It is not uncommon to see gas stations that sell ethanol because ethanol stations have lower construction costs than petroleum stations. Most of the ethanol sold in Sweden is derived from grain. From a lifecycle viewpoint — where climate impact is measured along the whole chain from production to use — ethanol extracted from sugarcane is favored. Swedish researchers focus on the production of ethanol from cellulose, referred to as second-generation biofuels, which uses a more effective production method than grain-based ethanol. Moreover, this type of ethanol does not affect food crops. Among other biofuel sources is biogas that can be extracted from manure and waste.

Flex-Fuel Vehicles
Stockholm placed an order for 2,000 flex-fuel vehicles (FFVs) for any car manufacturer willing to produce them. Ford Motor Company took the offer and delivered its first set of the flex-fuel version of the Ford Focus in 2001, selling more than 15,000 by 2005.

Sweden’s swift adoption of flex-fuel vehicles, rising from 717 in 2001 to over 200,000 by 2011, can be attributed to the National Climate Policy in Global Cooperation Bill passed in 2005, which exceeded the Kyoto Protocol expectations and sought to eliminate oil imports by 2020.

To meet these high standards, several government incentives were implemented, including a tax exemption for ethanol and other biofuels, which resulted in a 30% price reduction at the pump for E85 fuel over gasoline. Other “demand side” incentives included a US$1,800 bonus to buyers of FFVs, a 20% discount on auto insurance, free parking spaces and a tax reduction for flex-fuel company cars. By 2008, this incentive package resulted in sales of FFVs representing 25% of new car sales.

International oil dependency is one of the world’s biggest problems and as Sahlin notes, a Sweden free of fossil fuels would give the country enormous advantages, “not least by reducing the impact from fluctuations in oil prices. The price of oil has tripled since 1996.” Sweden’s investments, actions and laws are no accident, and although Sweden’s goal of eliminating oil consumption is seen as ambitious by the rest of the world, their attention to the detrimental effects of this dependence is worth noting. As Nelson Mandela reminds us “it seems impossible until it is done.”

Original Post

Nathan Wilson's picture
Nathan Wilson on Apr 12, 2013

Before 1974, Sweden used a lot of oil to make electricity; they have since very successfully replaced oil in that application with nuclear power, yielding one of the lowest-carbon electric portfolios on the planet (they also have a large amount of hydro and a bit of renewables).  This was great for the environment and for their economy.

Replacing oil in transportation can potentially be both expensive and environmentally bad.  And of course the corn-ethanol “food to fuel” program has severe ethical problems.

So 2020 is just seven years away.  Do they have a pilot plant running yet that makes cellulosic ethanol?  

Remember that 21% of the energy in E-85 comes from gasoline (made from oil).  Are they building methanol-to-gasoline plants and biomass-to-methanol plants to make up the difference?

The article mentions biogas.  Have they started to deploy cars that can burn it yet?

I wonder if this isn’t just more grand promises from politicians who have no intention of taking the actions required to fulfill them? 

Paul O's picture
Paul O on Apr 12, 2013

Hi Zana,

“……………The oil crisis in the early 1970s forced Sweden to embark on a quest for alternative energy sources. Its phasing out of oil has proceeded smoothly; in 1970, oil accounted for 77% of Sweden’s energy, but by 2003 that figure fell to 32%.…………….”


Was it Too painful or difficult to mention the part played by Nuclear Power in Sweden Departure from Oil Based electric power?

Rick Engebretson's picture
Rick Engebretson on Apr 12, 2013

There was a recent World Forests Summit in Stockholm, co-sponsored by British and other interests.

A key issue is to put economic value in forests so they are better protected globally. Food, energy, CO2, fresh water, clean air, biodiversity are rarely included in energy costs. But these resources do matter to most every living thing.

With leading paper science in a declining paper market, forest industries look to biofuel as both a new market and resource management tool. Unless we preserve, protect and enhance forests worldwide the world dies, no matter the cost of electricity or oil.

I’m not sure ethanol is the best route, or methanol, or simply a suitable fuel derived from different resources. But I’m glad competent people worldwide are giving it a try.

B Tinker's picture
B Tinker on Aug 22, 2013

This article Posted April 11, 2013, is disengenous at best.  All the facts herein are taken from a commission report that was never voted into law and does not reflect Swedish law or policy.

In 2005 the government of Sweden appointed a commission to draw up a comprehensive programme to reduce Sweden’s dependence on petroluem, natural gas, and other ‘fossil raw materials’ by 2020. In June 2006 (less than three months before the 2006 general election) the commission issued its report, entitled Making Sweden an OIL-FREE Society.

In their report, the Commission proposed the following targets for 2020:

  • consumption of oil in road transport to be reduced by 40-50 per cent;
  • consumption of oil in industry to be cut by 25-40 per cent;
  • heating buildings with oil, a practice already cut by 70% since the 1973 oil crisis, should be phased out;
  • overall, energy should be used 20% more efficiently.
Replacing oil with renewble energy sources and energy conservation measures to cut total energy use was envisioned.
As of 2005, oil supplies provided about 32% of the country’s energy supply, with nuclear power and hydroelectricity providing much of the remainder. Although the report did not propose to end the use of oil entirely, the 2020 date was suggested as a marker on a continuing process of the “oil phase-out in Sweden”.
Following defeat of the incumbent government coalition in the 2006 general election, the proposals were not included in the energy policy or in any law. 
Currently, no official policy in Sweden aims at achieving an oil-free society within any given time-horizon.
Zana Nesheiwat's picture
Thank Zana for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »