Taking the next step toward grid modernization

image credit: PXiSE
Becky Wheeler's picture
Head of Marketing, PXiSE Energy Solutions

Becky is simply a story-teller. But from a corporate point-of-view, she has more than a decade of experience in start-up, nonprofit, and global publicly held company environments spending the...

  • Member since 2020
  • 8 items added with 15,444 views
  • Feb 24, 2022

Utility decision makers can be faced with option paralysis when trying to determine the best path forward for modernizing their electric grids. It’s not that solutions don’t exist for the problems they’re facing. On the contrary, there are unique solutions for every problem and determining the ideal path forward—that solves today’s problems while setting utilities up for the future—is a daunting task.

Adding to the stress of deciding on the best next step is a heightened sense of urgency. Utilities are facing an onslaught of threats to grid stability and long-term financial viability brought on by a perfect storm of rapidly increasing customer distributed energy resources (DERs) and extreme weather events. Customer solar PV and EV adoption show no signs of slowing and are foundational in President Biden’s infrastructure plans to reenergize the US economy. Add in regulatory pressures and the urgency to get cracking on solutions is real and not about to relax any time soon.

But how can you act quickly to revolutionize a grid that has been in the making for over 100 years and seen little technological change during that time? And how can you be sure the path you choose is the correct one when it’s all unfamiliar territory?

Choosing a path

The truth is you can’t tackle the entire grid and all its issues at once. However, solutions exist today that enable you to make rapid progress on many large problems while putting the building blocks in place for solving the next set. When software is implemented, it can provide you with the visibility, analysis, and control of conditions on your grid that were previously beyond your grasp—and help determine the next steps in your grid modernization journey.

The key is to understand all the problems holistically but to tackle them one small chunk at a time, ensuring each solution builds on the previous one, and provides exponential benefits as you go. To figure out which small chunk to start with, or what angle to approach from, start by answering these three questions:

  1. What is your utility’s philosophy toward managing customer-owned assets located behind the meter?
  2. What is the depth of your utility’s relationship with its residential, industrial, and commercial customers?
  3. What are the current conditions on the utility’s grid?

Depending on your answers to these questions, they will point you to start either with localized microgrid solutions that can later be aggregated at a higher level, or to start from above with higher-level DER management and work your way down to the localized solutions. Both paths are a viable means to achieve grid modernization and can be accomplished by implementing modular software that can scale with and leverage the increasing complexity.

The following white papers offer further guidance on which path your answers can point you toward

Deciding on the next step shouldn’t feel like going down a path of no return. Unlike expensive capital infrastructure, software investments are relatively easy to implement and offer a multi-pronged approach to solving grid modernization challenges. Furthermore, implementing and taking advantage of systems with artificial intelligence today will free up more resources to strategize on next steps, positioning you and your utility as a 21st Century grid leader.

Connect with PXiSE Energy Solutions

Fill out this form to receive more information from PXiSE Energy Solutions.

Todd Carney's picture
Todd Carney on Mar 10, 2022

Becky, thank you for writing such an interesting piece. It is really informative and helpful at a time where grids are facing such challenges. So I've noticed in states like TX, it is becoming a political issue. I imagine that could be good or bad. On one hand, political pressure can be a catalyst for change, on the other hand as pressure increases, it can create partisan gridlock. Do you see things heading in the right or wrong direction for helping create this change?

Becky Wheeler's picture
Thank Becky for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »