Clean Hydrogen via Integrated Energy Systems is Closer Than Ever

Posted to Idaho National Laboratory in the Clean Power Professionals Group
image credit: © Leestat |
Nicole Stricker's picture
Science Communications Manager Idaho National Laboratory

Nicole Stricker is the manager of Science Communications at Idaho National Laboratory. She works with scientists and engineers to explain their work to audiences outside their field of research....

  • Member since 2018
  • 24 items added with 15,395 views
  • Jan 27, 2021

This item is part of the Special Issue - 2021-01 - Predictions and Trends, click here for more

Future hybrid energy systems could lead to paradigm shifts in clean energy production, national lab researchers and industry leaders predict. Beyond providing flexibility and an abundant supply of clean energy, such systems could support sectors of the economy that are more difficult to decarbonize, such as industry and transportation.

Integrated energy systems would simultaneously leverage diverse energy generators — including renewable, nuclear and fossil with carbon capture — to provide power, heat, mobility and other energy services. By integrating energy resources, utilities could create higher-value products, deliver lower-emission energy to industry, and better coordinate demand with production.

“It’s an opportunity to utilize synergies that are developing in electric grid markets and create new opportunities for these clean energy resources,” said Idaho National Laboratory’s Bruce Hallbert at a virtual press briefing hosted by the United States Energy Association on Jan. 15.

Hallbert explained how nuclear energy plants in particular could benefit from integrated systems, which would allow the plants to sell not only electricity, but also products such as heat or hydrogen. Green hydrogen, which is made by splitting water instead of natural gas, was the press briefing’s focus.

“Hydrogen presents tremendous opportunities over the next decade,” said Michael Green, general manager for nuclear power at Arizona Public Service and speaker at the briefing. In fact, a recent international study identifies hydrogen as a “missing link” to meeting climate goals. That’s why hydrogen production is a central component of integrated systems at nuclear plants.

Developing technologies that could lower operating costs and open new markets for nuclear power plants is among the objectives outlined by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy. The office is supporting a $10-million project led by Xcel Energy to produce hydrogen at a Minnesota nuclear plant. The effort would use high-temperature steam electrolysis, which is more efficient than low-temperature electrolysis. Xcel and partners in the effort – Arizona Public Service and Energy Harbor – aim to demonstrate the first phase of this capability by 2022. DOE wants to enable demonstration of a nuclear-renewable hybrid system by 2027.


The national laboratories have long been studying integrated energy systems, with an eye to traversing technical barriers and understanding economic drivers.

“The design of integrated energy systems is a significant challenge — and opportunity,” former INL Director Mark Peters said last year.

A historic collaboration between the nation’s Nuclear Energy, Renewable Energy and Fossil Energy labs aims to address this grand national challenge from an objective, holistic perspective. Researchers from DOE’s three applied energy laboratories — Idaho National Laboratory (INL), the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) and the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) — co‑authored a research paper describing novel integrated energy systems.

The paper outlines a path forward for hybrid energy systems, presenting an objective new framework for engineering-based modeling and analysis. That framework will aid the complex optimization of energy generation, transmission, services, processes and products, plus market interactions.

“Working together, researchers at the nation’s applied energy laboratories have identified critical synergies among different power generation sources, which will be vital to transforming our energy economy,” said NREL Director Martin Keller.

The paper describes one example of the multi-input, multi-output nature of these systems: a hypothetical, tightly coupled industrial energy park that uses heat and electricity from highly flexible advanced nuclear reactors, small-scale fossil generators, and renewable energy technologies to produce electricity and hydrogen from electrolysis.

“In this scenario, depending on market pricing, electricity and/or heat could be sold into the grid, used on-site, or stored for later distribution and use,” said David C. Miller, NETL’s senior fellow for strategic systems analysis and engineering and co-author of the article. “Furthermore, the output streams could also be used to produce hydrogen or other valuable chemicals and products.”


The recently approved fiscal year 2021 appropriations language calls on DOE to establish a research, development and demonstration program that focuses on cost-effective integrated energy systems. As a first step, it calls for a research agenda that coordinates across the DOE program offices.

For its part, INL is already a good way down that road. The lab has been building a scaled test facility that can use electrical heating to represent the thermal input derived from a coupled nuclear energy plant. INL’s thermal energy distribution system (TEDS) is just one component of the lab’s Dynamic Energy Transport and Integration Laboratory (DETAIL), which will allow demonstration of a wide array of integrated energy system configurations.

In 2021, TEDS will be integrated with other systems in the laboratory to further advance IES demonstration capabilities. Those systems include a real-time digital grid simulator, high-temperature electrolysis systems and the planned electrically heated Microreactor Agile Nonnuclear Test facility (MAGNET).

The design of hybrid energy systems will require input from experts across the spectrum of energy research. To this end, the body of work by the three applied national laboratories, including tri-lab workshops and the recent Joule article, represents a significant step forward toward realizing the advanced energy systems of the future.

“The national laboratories offer a diversity of expertise that will allow us to achieve effective, cross-sector collaboration that is necessary to solve the true energy and environment grand challenges of our time,” said Shannon Bragg-Sitton, INL lead for integrated energy systems and co-author of the article.

Idaho National Laboratory
Part of the U.S. Dept. of Energy’s complex of national laboratories, INL performs work in each of the strategic goal areas: energy, national security, science & environment. INL is the nation’s leading center for nuclear energy research & development.
Nicole Stricker's picture
Thank Nicole for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member


Spell checking: Press the CTRL or COMMAND key then click on the underlined misspelled word.
Bob Meinetz's picture
Bob Meinetz on Jan 27, 2021

Nicole, promoting hydrogen as a clean liquid fuel is a double-edged sword.

Sure, nuclear hydrogen is green. But originally, hydrogen and PEM fuel cells were developed as a way to market methane (aka "natural gas"), and hydrogen made by steam-reforming methane is NOT green (from a carbon-emissions standpoint, it's worse than burning methane). In promotional materials, oil companies avoid mentioning how it's made by saying: "All that comes out of your tailpipe is water."

I fear promoting hydrogen is merely extending reliance on gas, and ultimately discouraging adoption of clean nuclear energy.

Laura Scheele's picture
Laura Scheele on Jan 28, 2021

Bob, The promise of producing clean hydrogen lays within the development of zero-to-low carbon production methods that move away from steam-methane reforming. There are at least two pilot projects at existing nuclear plants that will use low- and high-temperature steam electrolysis, and I would expect to see additional methods moving forward as the technology and processes evolve.

I tend to think that we'll see nuclear energy developing to meet a variety of needs in additional to generating carbon-free electricity (which is always valuable). What are your thoughts regarding hydrogen used for transport vs the electrification of transportation?

Bob Meinetz's picture
Bob Meinetz on Jan 29, 2021

Thanks for your response, Laura.

Due to the extreme energy density of its fuel, its low cost, and the fact it generates no carbon emissions, efficiency is a relatively-insignificant consideration with nuclear energy. It can be used to make hydrogen via electrolysis, but even more productively by using process heat in High Temperature Gas Reactors (HTGRs) to power the sulfur-iodine cycle.

Nevertheless, using hydrogen as an energy carrier is significantly less efficient than charging batteries from the power grid. Once produced, the hydrogen must be compressed to ~800 bar (or refrigerated to -253°C) to convert it to liquid form, then transported by truck to the point of sale, to be useful as a transportation fuel.

Given its shady history, and the impossibility of verifying hydrogen's source, and its cost-effective method of production, I fear most hydrogen consumed by the public will be made from methane, its carbon pre-expelled at the refinery. That 1% of hydrogen might come from a clean source does nothing to change the fact hydrogen is basically another fossil fuel.

Oil companies have simultaneously advanced efforts to replace nuclear plants with gas-fired plants, however, in essence making electricity another fossil fuel. So if we're serious about addressing climate change, the #1 priority should be ending fossil fuel extraction. I believe adopting hydrogen will only prolong that effort.

Nathan Wilson's picture
Nathan Wilson on Feb 3, 2021

Good points Bob.  However, I believe our two serious problems of corrupt campaign financing and wide-spread mis-information make us powerless to end our use of fossil fuels.  Any community that tries will inevitably be sold (often by well-meaning activists) on a path that leads to continued fossil fuel use.

So I think the best path for the US must combine nuclear, renewables, and fossil fuel with CC&S.  Then at least the fossil fuel importing countries can choose energy sources that are actually clean.

Green hydrogen (from electrolysis) will be great for fossil fuel importing countries; that's a good reason for us to develop and mature the technology.  But it has very poor prospects for economic competitiveness in fossil fuel producing countries like the US; hence the importance of CC&S.

That said, there are two green-hydrogen related technologies I find promising: 

- The battolyzer is a modified nickel-iron-hydrogen battery which generates hydrogen when it over-charges.  This allows the hydrogen production & battery to share balance-of-plant stuff (grid connections, building, staff, etc), to potentially improve H2 economics.

- Reverse ammonia fuel cell - this is a steam electrolysis cell and hydrogen+nitrogen to ammonia reactor combined into one.   This could make green ammonia more competitive with ammonia from fossil gas, which requires two steps to go from methane -> hydrogen -> ammonia.

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »