How to Streamline Regulatory Approvals with Decision Analytics

Posted to Copperleaf in the Utility Management Group
image credit: Copperleaf
David Wu's picture
Practice Lead, Pipelines, Copperleaf

David has over 10 years experience in the oil and gas industry, specializing in the design, construction, maintenance, and operation of critical facilities and pipelines. David is a registered...

  • Member since 2020
  • 1 items added with 66 views
  • Sep 18, 2023

Over the past decade, stakeholder expectations and regulatory requirements have evolved. While previous regulations focused on reducing risk and improving reliability, recent expectations have shifted to monetizing risk in investment plans and ensuring program benefits are greater than the costs to customers.

Regulated utilities must strike the right balance between managing business-as-usual activities and investing for the future—while complying with ever-changing regulatory requirements and ramping up renewable energy sources to meet Environmental, Social, and Government (ESG) and decarbonization goals. Meeting these objectives and earning stakeholder trust will require innovation and rigorous investment planning.

A consistent, transparent decision-making process can increase the speed and likelihood of regulatory approvals—by providing a line of sight from planned investments to regulatory and corporate objectives, and the ability to demonstrate how plans support the interests of internal and external stakeholders.

The importance of a defensible capital plan

New requirements mean utilities are facing increased scrutiny because any changes to investment plans can translate to changes in rates and costs to customers. From 2007 through 2021, Regulatory Research Associates saw over $30B in rate increases from 822 “settled” electric and gas utility base rate cases, but only ~40-50% of increases were approved.

In Virginia, regulators require utilities to account for reasonable load growth, and show compliance with recently passed state laws regarding offshore wind, battery storage, and increased spending on efficiency programs. In 2018, Arizona regulators rejected a utility’s resource plan for failing to account for uncertainty and the “best interest of its customers.” A Hawaiian utility had its plan rejected because they didn’t provide reasonable or meaningful analysis to justify proposed projects.

These examples highlight the importance of creating robust, transparent investment plans and exploring different scenarios upfront to ensure regulators can fully understand the proposed plan, and reduce clarification efforts and approval time. Utilities must demonstrate how the organization will operationalize the investment strategy to meet regulatory and stakeholder expectations around ESG requirements.

Meet regulatory expectations with value-based decision making

Passing regulatory scrutiny will require utilities to build accountability and trust by clearly outlining the rationale, costs, benefits, and impact of their proposed plans. Organizations must consider a much broader definition of value—to measure non-financial benefits and highlight how plans support goals related to environmental justice, energy equity, sustainability, decarbonization, and grid modernization. Considering the impacts of investments in these areas is no longer a nice-to-have, but required (or soon-to-be required, depending on the regulator).

These new considerations are difficult to quantify, but must still complement traditional investment drivers, such as safety and reliability. Regulators are requiring utilities to account for all these factors in their decision-making approach. Using a consistent, value-based decision-making framework to assess all potential investments allows projects focused on risk mitigation or environmental compliance to be compared fairly alongside capacity-building and revenue-generating investments.

Use decision analytics to communicate value and build trust

To build trust with regulators, utilities need to be more rigorous and data-driven with their investment scenario analyses during decision making, and provide more transparency in the resulting plans. Simply prioritizing some projects over others is not enough when all projects are not created equal, and utilities are called to justify and defend decisions. Therefore, utilities must perform detailed cost and benefit analyses to show regulators that they selected the most optimal plan while accounting for all stakeholder needs and requirements.

Pairing advanced decision analytics with a value framework that includes well-defined benefits and constraints can help utilities optimize investment planning and decision making. This combination allows organizations to compare disparate projects on a common, quantifiable scale, to create transparent, actionable plans. An equitable plan can also support less-tangible objectives related to ESG impact. Data visualization and GIS tools can facilitate communication of the plan and demonstrate how each investment meets requirements and provides benefit to customers.

The Copperleaf solution

Copperleaf’s approach and best-practice value models have been proven and accepted by regulatory bodies globally, allowing clients to create optimal investment plans, analyze sensitivities, predict expected outcomes, and defend plans to regulators and external stakeholders.

Copperleaf® clients across regulated industries report:

  • significant time savings in preparing submissions
  • reduced conflict with regulators and external stakeholders due to greater transparency
  • a higher percentage of submissions approved with few to no revisions required

Download this playbook to learn six steps to streamline regulatory approval.

Connect with Copperleaf

Fill out this form to receive more information from Copperleaf.

Copperleaf can help your organization decide where and when to invest in your business to maximize capital efficiency, meet performance targets, manage risk, and achieve your ESG and financial goals.
Mark Silverstone's picture
Mark Silverstone on Sep 20, 2023

It is nice to hear that at least some companies, including utilities and vendors, are coping succssfully with often, on these pages, much maligned (some justifiably?) regulatory bodies.

One issue is of particular interest to me: In recent years we have  heard quite a bit of, on the one hand, used wind turbine blades (and other used wind and solar equipment) filling up land fills and, on the other hand, various technologies to recycle used blades and other materials. 
Can you please comment if this issue is «normally» an issue in regulatory approvsl applications these days and what the results are? Thanks!

David Wu's picture
Thank David for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network® is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »