The two choices Maine lawmakers face on solar power
- Aug 2, 2017 4:53 am GMT
One does nothing, leaving in place a temporary system regulators created. The plan upset solar friends and foes alike. Utility
The other option is to override a veto from Gov.
Both of those options would gradually draw down incentives for solar power and neither of them is intended as a long-term solution to fairly compensating small-scale solar generators for the power they put onto the grid.
But the outcome of Wednesday's veto override vote will determine how those generators get paid for new solar installations starting in 2018, which is an important detail for anyone considering to buy.
It's also relevant to utilities. While power generation is none of their business in
By the end of 2016,
Lawmakers passed the bill to tweak those rules with enough support to override a veto, but it's unclear how the repeat of that vote will play out.
That leaves two avenues still rife with complexities and unanswered questions. Here's a rundown of those options, however lawmakers decide.
In case of veto, see PUC rule
Upholding LePage's veto would put
That allows customers with small generation systems -- mostly solar -- to get credits when they generate more power than they consume, putting electricity back onto the grid.
Currently, they get paid the full retail rate, which means the cost for the electricity itself and the portion of charges for using the poles and wires to transmit that power. The PUC rule would step down how much solar customers get paid for the transmission part, based on the year they install their system.
PUC rule would draw down credits for transmission and distribution part of bills (p. 7)
View entire document on DocumentCloud
To handle that, the rule allows utilities to install a second meter to measure the output of solar power systems. Under the rule, the utility could not recover those costs directly from that customer, putting the cost of those installations onto its general pool of ratepayers.
But the PUC rules have a shelf life. When solar capacity hits 3 percent of peak demand in any utility's service territory, regulators will take another look at the policy. That's similar to the review that brought on the new rules in the first place, which required notification when that figure hit 1 percent of peak demand.
CMP notified regulators that they hit that benchmark in late 2015.
What happens with an override
The new rule would draw down solar incentives for two years, leaving it up to regulators whether to keep that up in subsequent years. That seems likely as the policy those regulators crafted would do just that.
The bill prevents a utility from requiring a separate meter to attach to solar generation facilities in order to participate in net metering, seeking to avoid that cost while regulators figure out other options.
That directive is another key difference. While the next review under the PUC policy comes at the 3-percent threshold, the bill requires the PUC to conclude its study of how to transition away from net metering by
In a change hailed by solar advocates, the policy raises the number of customers who can share ownership in net metered solar generation facilities, referred to as "community solar." The bill raises the current cap from 10 customers to a cap of 100 customers.
(c)2017 the Bangor Daily News (Bangor, Maine)
Visit the Bangor Daily News (Bangor, Maine) at www.bangordailynews.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
No discussions yet. Start a discussion below.
Get Published - Build a Following
The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.
If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.