FERC Seeks Info Collection: Data Collection for Analytics, Surveillance, Market-Based Rate Purposes
- Apr 6, 2021 2:47 pm GMTApr 6, 2021 8:19 pm GMT
- 95 views
WASHINGTON, April 6 -- The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has proposed an information collection entitled: "Data Collection for Analytics and Surveillance and Market-Based Rate Purposes."
An April 6, 2021, notice published in the Federal Register by Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, proposes to open a 60-day public comment period.
1. In this Notice, the Commission requests comments on a proposal to collect additional data from certain market-based rate (MBR) sellers (Sellers) through revisions to the data dictionary and XML schema that accompany the relational database established in Order No. 860 (MBR Data Dictionary). Specifically, the Commission proposes revisions to the MBR Data Dictionary to require that Sellers whose ultimate upstream affiliate(s) own their voting securities pursuant to a section 203(a)(2) blanket authorization, provide in the relational database the docket number of the section 203(a)(2) blanket authorization, and the utility ID types and the utility IDs of the upstream affiliates whose securities were acquired pursuant to that section 203(a)(2) blanket authorization. I. Background
2. On July 18, 2019, the Commission issued Order No. 860, which revised certain aspects of the substance and format of information Sellers submit to the Commission for market-based rate purposes. Among other things, the Commission adopted the approach to collect market-based rate information in a relational database. The Commission also specified that any significant changes to the MBR Data Dictionary will be proposed in a Commission order or rulemaking, which would provide an opportunity for comment.
3. In support, the Commission explained that the relational database construct provides for a more modern and flexible format for the reporting and retrieval of information. The Commission noted that Sellers will be linked to their market-based rate affiliates through common ultimate upstream affiliate(s) and that, through this linkage, the relational database will allow for the automatic generation of a complete asset appendix based solely on the information submitted into the relational database.
4. The Commission required that, as part of its market-based rate application or baseline submission, a Seller must identify through the relational database its ultimate upstream affiliate(s). Because this is a characteristic the Commission will rely upon in granting market-based rate authority, the Commission specified that Sellers must also inform the Commission when they have a new ultimate upstream affiliate as part of their change in status reporting obligations. The Commission also required that any new ultimate upstream affiliate information must also be submitted into the relational database and any changes updated on a monthly basis. II. Discussion
A. Petition for Declaratory Order
5. In Docket No. EL21-14-000, NextEra Energy, Inc., American Electric Power Company, Inc., Evergy, Inc., Exelon Corporation, and Xcel Energy Services Inc. on behalf of Xcel Energy Inc. (Petitioners) filed a petition for declaratory order (Petition) regarding, among other things, affiliation under FPA section 205 of an institutional investor that has been granted blanket authorization under FPA section 203(a)(2). Specifically, Petitioners request that the Commission find that no affiliation arises under section 205 when institutional investors acquire up to 20% of the voting securities of utilities pursuant to a section 203(a)(2) blanket authorization order.
6. While we are denying the Petition in a concurrently issued order, we are providing guidance that will address, in part, the concerns Petitioners raise. As discussed more fully in the order denying the Petition, we disagree with Petitioners that no affiliation arises under section 205 when institutional investors acquire up to 20% of the voting securities of utilities pursuant to a section 203(a)(2) blanket authorization order. However, we agree with Petitioners that, as a result of the conditions in a section 203(a)(2) blanket authorization order, the institutional investors subject to that order lack the ability to control the utilities whose voting securities they acquire. Accordingly, because those conditions prevent institutional investors from exercising control over those utilities, utilities commonly owned by an institutional investor are not affiliates of each other under 18 CFR 35.36(a)(9)(iv), so long as their institutional investor owners remain under the conditions imposed in its section 203(a)(2) blanket authorization order. As a result, the Commission's various affiliate restrictions would not apply between utilities, including market-based rate sellers, whose securities are owned by a common institutional investor pursuant to a section 203(a)(2) blanket authorization.
7. However, the relational database, as contemplated under Order Nos. 860 and 860-A, does not provide for a method to distinguish between ultimate upstream affiliates and those ultimate upstream affiliates that acquired the securities of the Seller through a section 203(a)(2) blanket authorization. Accordingly, we propose changes to the MBR Data Dictionary so that the relational database can accurately reflect the affiliations, or lack of affiliation, among Sellers for which their ultimate upstream affiliate is an institutional investor who acquired their securities pursuant to a section 203(a)(2) blanket authorization.
B. Changes to the MBR Data Dictionary
8. We propose to collect certain data in the relational database for purposes of generating accurate asset appendices when the voting securities of a Seller or a Seller's upstream affiliate have been acquired, 10% or more, pursuant to a section 203(a)(2) blanket authorization. This new requirement would only be required for Sellers with upstream affiliates whose securities have been acquired, 10% or more, pursuant to a section 203(a)(2) blanket authorization; thus, there will be no burden on other Sellers.
9. Specifically, this Notice proposes to update the MBR Data Dictionary and add three new attributes to the Entities to Entities table. These new attributes are: The blanket authorization docket number, and the utility ID types and the utility IDs of the utilities whose securities were purchased under the corresponding blanket authorization docket number. The appropriate Sellers would be required to submit the docket number of the proceeding in which the Commission granted the section 203(a)(2) blanket authorization and the upstream affiliate whose securities were acquired pursuant to the section 203(a)(2) blanket authorization.
10. We believe that these new attributes are necessary to prevent the connection of unaffiliated entities when auto-generating asset appendices, consistent with our findings in NextEra. The draft of the Entities to Entities table in MBR Data Dictionary which describes these fields in detail is attached in Appendix A. We seek comment on these changes.
11. We anticipate that the MBR Data Dictionary with appropriate validations will be posted on the Commission website upon issuance of a final order in this proceeding.
C. Impact on the Asset Appendix
12. As discussed in Order No. 860, the relational database will auto-generate a Seller's asset appendix based on the information that is submitted into the relational database. Currently, the ultimate upstream affiliate information is used to connect affiliates through this common affiliate in all instances. However, as currently constructed, the relational database would erroneously link companies through common ultimate upstream affiliates when the securities of a Seller's upstream affiliate were acquired pursuant to a section 203(a)(2) blanket authorization. Consistent with our findings in NextEra, we propose that, under these circumstances, the relational database instead link MBR affiliates through the upstream affiliate whose securities were acquired pursuant to the section 203(a)(2) blanket authorization, with the aim of providing the information needed, while limiting the burden.
III. Information Collection Statement
13. The Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) requires each federal agency to seek and obtain Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approval before undertaking a collection of information directed to ten or more persons or contained in a rule of general applicability. OMB regulations require approval of certain information collection requirements imposed by agency rules. Upon approval of a collection of information, OMB will assign an OMB control number and an expiration date. Respondents subject to the filing requirements of this proposal will not be penalized for failing to respond to this collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number.
14. We plan to request OMB approval for a revision of FERC-919A (Refinements to Policies and Procedures for Market Based Rates for Wholesale Sales of Electric Energy, Capacity and Ancillary Services by Public Utilities), OMB Control Number 1902-0317. We solicit comments on the Commission's need for this information, whether the information will have practical utility, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondents' burden, including the use of automated information techniques.
15. The proposal in this Notice will affect Sellers that have ultimate upstream affiliates that hold their voting securities pursuant to section 203(a)(2) blanket authorizations. Sellers continue to be required to report institutional investors who own 10% percent or more of their voting shares pursuant to section 203(a)(2) blanket authorizations as their reportable ultimate upstream affiliate in the relational database. However, the proposal herein would also require these Sellers to identify their upstream affiliate(s) whose securities have been acquired, 10% or more, pursuant to a section 203(a)(2) blanket authorization. This requirement includes submitting into the relational database the docket number of the order granting the institutional investor section 203(a)(2) blanket authorization, the identifier of the upstream affiliate(s) whose securities were acquired pursuant to the section 203(a)(2) blanket authorization, and the type of identifier reported. The proposal would not impose any additional reporting requirements for Sellers whose ultimate upstream affiliates do not hold their voting securities pursuant to section 203(a)(2) blanket authorizations.
16. There are approximately 2,647 Sellers that will submit information into the relational database. Six institutional investors currently have section 203(a)(2) blanket authorizations, which collectively own approximately 110 upstream affiliates that themselves own Sellers. We are estimating an average of four Sellers affected for every upstream affiliate, equaling 440 total sellers. Under this proposal, Sellers whose ultimate upstream affiliates hold their voting securities pursuant to section 203(a)(2) blanket authorizations would be required to report the upstream affiliate(s) whose securities have been acquired pursuant to a section 203(a)(2) blanket authorization, and certain information pertaining to the institutional investors, as described above.
17. Burden Estimate: The estimated burden and cost for the requirements proposed in this Notice follow. Our estimate is limited to the proposal to require Sellers reporting institutional investors with section 203(a)(2) blanket authorizations as their ultimate upstream affiliates to add information on the upstream affiliate(s) whose securities have been acquired pursuant to a section 203(a)(2) blanket authorization in the above-noted fields within the relational database.
18. The following table summarizes the average estimated annual burden and cost changes due to this notice seeking comments and includes the estimate from Order 860 being replaced here:
IV. Environmental Analysis
19. The Commission is required to prepare an Environmental Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement for any action that may have a significant adverse effect on the human environment. The Commission has categorically excluded certain actions from these requirements as not having a significant effect on the human environment. The actions proposed here fall within a categorical exclusion in the Commission's regulations, i.e., they involve information gathering, analysis, and dissemination. Therefore, environmental analysis is unnecessary and has not been performed.
V. Regulatory Flexibility Act
20. The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA) generally requires a description and analysis of proposed rules that will have significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The RFA mandates consideration of regulatory alternatives that accomplish the stated objectives of a proposed rule and minimize any significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. In lieu of preparing a regulatory flexibility analysis, an agency may certify that a proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
21. The Small Business Administration's (SBA) Office of Size Standards develops the numerical definition of a small business. The SBA size standard for electric utilities is based on the number of employees, including affiliates. Under SBA's current size standards, an electric utility (one that falls under NAICS codes 221122 [electric power distribution, with a small business threshold of 1,000 employees], 221121 [electric bulk power transmission and control, with a small business threshold of 500 employees], or 221118 [other electric power generation, with a small business threshold of 250 employees]) are small if it, including its affiliates, employs 1,000 or fewer people.
22. Of the 440 affected entities discussed above, we estimate that none of these will be small entities. Therefore, no small entities will incur additional cost due to this Notice. Accordingly, we certify that this Notice will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
VI. Comment Procedures
23. The Commission invites interested persons to submit comments on the matters and issues proposed in this notice to be adopted, including any related matters or alternative proposals that commenters may wish to discuss. Comments are due June 7, 2021. Comments must refer to Docket No. RM16-17-000, and must include the commenter's name, the organization they represent, if applicable, and their address in their comments. All comments will be placed in the Commission's public files and may be viewed, printed, or downloaded remotely as described in the Document Availability section below. Commenters on this proposal are not required to serve copies of their comments on other commenters.
24. The Commission encourages comments to be filed electronically via the eFiling link on the Commission's website at http://www.ferc.gov. The Commission accepts most standard word processing formats. Documents created electronically using word processing software should be filed in native applications or print-to-PDF format and not in a scanned format. Commenters filing electronically do not need to make a paper filing.
25. Commenters that are not able to file comments electronically may file an original of their comment by USPS mail or by courier-or other delivery services. For submission sent via USPS only, filings should be mailed to: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Office of the Secretary, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426. Submission of filings other than by USPS should be delivered to: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, MD 20852.
VII. Document Availability
26. In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://www.ferc.gov). At this time, the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's Public Reference Room due to the President's March 13, 2020 proclamation declaring a National Emergency concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19).
27. From the Commission's Home Page on the internet, this information is available on eLibrary. The full text of this document is available on eLibrary in PDF and Microsoft Word format for viewing, printing, and/or downloading. To access this document in eLibrary, type the docket number excluding the last three digits of this document in the docket number field.
28. User assistance is available for eLibrary and the Commission's website during normal business hours from the Commission's Online Support at 202-502-6652 (toll free at 1-866-208-3676) or email at firstname.lastname@example.org, or the Public Reference Room at (202) 502-8371, TTY (202) 502-8659. Email the Public Reference Room at email@example.com.
By direction of the Commission.
Issued: March 18, 2021.
Kimberly D. Bose,
* * *
TARGETED NEWS SERVICE (founded 2004) features non-partisan 'edited journalism' news briefs and information for news organizations, public policy groups and individuals; as well as 'gathered' public policy information, including news releases, reports, speeches. For more information contact MYRON STRUCK, editor, firstname.lastname@example.org, Springfield, Virginia; 703/304-1897; https://targetednews.com