Senior decision-makers come together to connect around strategies and business trends affecting utilities.

Post

Using ASC 980 and GASB 62 to Smooth ASC 360 or GASB 42 Impairment Losses

Russ Hissom's picture
Owner Utility Accounting Education Specialists - utilityeducation.com

Russ is the owner of Utility Accounting Education Specialists (UAES) a firm that provides online, on-demand, and in-person courses on power and utilities finance, accounting, and business process...

  • Member since 2021
  • 46 items added with 9,771 views
  • Oct 27, 2021
  • 219 views

Change is in the Air

There's a lot of letters and numbers in the title to this article - ASC 980, GASB, 62, ASC 360 or GASB 42, but we want to draw attention to the impact that impairment losses can have on your electric utility or co-op. The overall energy industry power supply mix is slowly (?) changing, from traditional fossil fuels to renewables and more "clean" fuels. Pricing in some energy markets shows that some traditional power supply assets are not marketable, i.e., the price of power production exceeds the market price.

Evaluating these resources leads to the conclusion that the assets are "impaired" or no longer viable for use, which from an accounting perspective means their value should be written off and recognized as a loss in the current period. This is formally known as an impairment . Impairment accounting standards are covered in ASC 360 or GASB 42 (private sector and public sector respectively).

Your access to Member Features is limited.

ASC 360 or GASB 42

The accounting impact of an impairment results in damage to the financial statements - a significant loss is recognized in the current year's financials, bond coverage is negatively impacted, and questions arise over the collectability in customer rates of debt payments that may still be due on the impaired assets.

Luckily, accounting standards have a soft spot for this situation. FASB ASC 980, GASB 62, and FERC contain provisions for " regulatory accounting " and have options to defer the loss and systematically recognize it over future years, matching debt payments.

 

Convinced? Here are 5 reasons why this approach can ease your worries over the financial impact and rate recovery for impaired assets.

1. Regulatory accounting using ASC 980 or GASB 62 allows spreading out the impairment over the remaining debt payments on the impaired assets. ASC 360 or GASB 42 outline the method to calculate the impairment, but ASC 980 and GASB 62 can define the rate recovery period. This means that the loss is recognized systematically over the remaining period of the debt payments. So, customer rates include the debt payments, which will offset the amount of the impairment. This leads to a cleaner and less dramatic income statement.

2. Electric rates should be smooth and steady . Customers don't like surprises in their rates. Under regulatory accounting for the impairment, rates continue to include the debt payment, as if the impairment never happened.

3. The regulators are comfortable with this approach . Whether your organization's electric rates are approved by a state regulator, utility board, or city council, these regulators will appreciate the impact on the income statement and customer rates. Questions by bond rating agencies are averted as bond coverage is maintained, and constituents do not have grounds for complaints about any rapid rate changes.

4. The regulatory approach is an easier sell to ratepayers. Part of the impairment conversation includes the story of the move to more market-based power resources, and price changes due to a mix of more renewable power. Customers should be kept informed that they share in the risk of market power costs and the power markets. As markets change and assets may be impaired, those assets' original cost still needs to be recovered through customer rates.

5. The impairment may not be collectible in customer rates someday. Your power and utilities' organization finances may ebb and flow over the period of impairment recovery. If the regulator determines that the amount should no longer be incorporated in customer rates, then the remaining unrecognized impairment loss should be recognized in income in that year. Using regulatory accounting to that point makes sure the proper amount of impairment loss is recognized.

Implementing Regulatory Accounting Will Help Management, the Oversight Board, and Your Customers Rest Easier

The regulatory approach to recognizing impairments (and other items) is the industry best practice in managing major expenses and matching them to recovery in customer rates. It's easy to implement and explain to the affected parties. Consider using this tool to protect your organization's income statement and customer rates.

Author - Russ Hissom, CPA

 

About Russ Hissom

 

Russ is the owner of Utility Accounting Education Specialists. He has over 35 years serving electric investor-owned and public power utilities, electric cooperatives, and telecommunications providers as a past partner in a national public accounting and consulting firm's energy practice. 

 

He is passionate about the power and utilities business! As an educator, speaker, trainer, and author, his goal is to share his knowledge of best practices in industry accounting, finance, and strategy implementation with you. This knowledge will help your organization serve your customers, grow, and meet industry transformation head-on. Plus, this will add value to your knowledge and career!

 

You can reach Russ at russ.hissom@utilityeducation.com

Russ Hissom's picture
Thank Russ for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member
Discussions
Spell checking: Press the CTRL or COMMAND key then click on the underlined misspelled word.
Matt Chester's picture
Matt Chester on Oct 27, 2021

Thanks for sharing, Russ-- do you have any specific case studies or prime examples to share to see this at work in practice? 

Russ Hissom's picture
Russ Hissom on Oct 30, 2021

Thanks for the question, Matt. Here's an example from a recent Edison report. 

Matt Chester's picture
Matt Chester on Nov 1, 2021

Very helpful-- thanks Russ!

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »