With such high numbers it's always hard to contextualize and know if it's the 'right' amount. For some reference: costs of the recent wildfires were estimated at $6.3B, they sought $3.6B in rate increases to help with wildfire safety, and a plan to bury all their wires could cost $240B. 

Are you satisfied with how much and where these investments are going, Kaylyn? Or is there more that should be pushed for? 

"The PG&E's GRC proposal includes approximately US$7.4 billion in new investments from 2023 to 2026 to help keep customers safe and reduce the impacts of extreme weather and the threat of catastrophic wildfires."

Odd that PG&E will be simultaneously closing a state-of-the-art nuclear plant, completely paid for by its 16 million customers - one that prevents 15.5 million tonnes of carbon emissions annually, the equivalent of 3 million additional cars on the road - while forcing those customers to pay $4.5 billion in unnecessary decommissioning costs, and now $7.4 billion to lesson the impacts of extreme weather, while pocketing the profits from extra sales of natural gas.

Somehow I find this revelation less than gratifying.

It's very hard to say what affect these changes will have. At least they are doing something.