Senior decision-makers come together to connect around strategies and business trends affecting utilities.


Demand response ...but in a proactive fashion

image credit: Rafael Herzberg
Rafael Herzberg's picture
Consultant energy affairs, Self employed

Rafael Herzberg- is an independent energy consultant, self-employed (since 2018) based in São Paulo, Brazil* Focus on C level, VPs and upper managers associated to energy related info, analysis...

  • Member since 2003
  • 2,215 items added with 1,292,725 views
  • May 19, 2022

Demand response ...but in a proactive fashion

DR programs are based on the assumption that when the electrical system is reaching a high demand there is a call to reduce it. Energy users who go for it get a hefty financial compensation.

I take this initiative to propose an enhanced version of the DR programs. It is based on the same concept (demand reduction) but in an synergistic fashion with respect to the ongoing DR programs.

Let me call it DRP. Demand Response but Proactive!

Industrial, commercial and institutional energy users must contract demand before their local utility companies. This happens in two ways around the globe. The fixed contracted demand and the ratchet.

When it is a fixed demand the local utility charges the maximum between recorded demand and contracted demand. If the recorded demand is higher than the contracted demand there is a penalty. If it is below, the end user pays an "idle" demand.

When a ratchet is in place, the local utility charges the maximum between the recorded demand of that month or the maximum recorded demand of the past "x" months (usually 12) times an established factor (usually in the range of 50% to 85%).

In both cases it is a very stiff condition. Especially so considering that changes are the name of the game for these energy users. Their demand varies with the intensity of their activities, with the technologies that are incorporated in their facilities, energy conversion processes and most importantly with the changes in what they do!

Bottom line: recorded demand is always changing.

How to go for a better billing structure?  Better for the local utility company AND for the end users?

My proposal is a Demand Exchange (DEX). An internet based service to be sponsored by the local utility company, that will allow/stimulate end users to exchange their demand differences.

The end result is: the local utility company will increase its load factor as there will be a reduction in idle demands because they will be transferred to other energy users who are willing to increase their contracted demands. In real life it is a zero sum game!

This flexibility will end up reducing clients demand charges and the local utility to sell more energy with the existing infrastructure. Simply put because what was an idle demand becomes an active one.

If you are interested to learn more about this concept, watch this video!

The take away of this article is: the DRP might become a very powerful tool for every other local utility company that has a strong base of industrial, commercial and institutional energy users.


No discussions yet. Start a discussion below.

Rafael Herzberg's picture
Thank Rafael for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »