Senior decision-makers come together to connect around strategies and business trends affecting utilities.


You need to be a member of Energy Central to access some features and content. Please or register to continue.


Coal may be down but utilities need to begin planning a divestment from natural gas

image credit: Courtesy EIA

Coal has submitted to renewable sources in electricity production in the U.S., the peak of an anti-coal campaign that really began heating up at the start of the 2010s. This is not news, at least it is not unexpected. The country's leading voices in clean energy have been working to beat back the hard, black lumps of fossil fuel enemy for a long time. With significant advancements in clean energy and its cost, coal has long been on its way out and activists across the country seem to now be claiming victory.

Quietly, as coal has taken the beating and attracted much of the ire, natural gas, the less tangible fossil fuel, has apparently won over the hearts and wallets of America's energy producers and utilities. On July 27, the U.S. set a new record as natural gas represented 45% of the country's energy generation portfolio. Nearly half! Between January and July of this year, natrual gas's portion of generation rarely dipped below 40% and, many times, eclipsed it. According to a recent Forbe's article, in 2001, between January and May, natural gas accounted for 15% of energy generation in the U.S.  

A three-fold increase in reliance on natural gas in the last 20 years is not great. Yes, natural gas's CO2 emissions are about 50-60% that of coal and oil; however, this year, natural gas represents nearly double coal's portion of electricity source. Mining for natural gas, which has picked up during the shale oil revolution, emits significant amounts of methane, which is better than CO2 at trapping heat in the atmosphere. 

LIke renewables, the cost of natural gas has dropped considerably. At one point, there was too much natural gas being produced and not enough buyers. With coal trending downwards, it's time for utilities to step up and squeezing natural gas into a much smaller portion of their energy portfolios. It's not an easy task considering how cost-effective natural gas can be for a company; however, utilities need to stop celebrating the divestment from coal and begin committing to shrinking their reliance on natural gas. 

Christopher Neely's picture

Thank Christopher for the Post!

Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.


Bob Meinetz's picture
Bob Meinetz on Sep 24, 2020 2:58 pm GMT

Christopher - most telling is the drop of renewables from 20% to 12% (?).

All part of the American Petroleum Institute's plan: 1) Shut down coal plants 2) Shut down nuclear plants 3) Shut down renewables  (except for a few pretty windmills spinning in the breeze, to use for commercial footage) 4) Dominate electricity production with fossil-fuel methane ("natural gas") for the foreseeable future.

Anyone who doesn't recognize this trend, who favors the replacement of carbon-free nuclear with renewables, is an accomplice to the crime.

Xisto Filho's picture
Xisto Filho on Sep 28, 2020 2:03 pm GMT

One has to be very careful  before taking decisions like that . To go to a completely " clean energy matrix " we have to solve adequately problems like flexibility, adequacy, stability , voltage and frequency control, power system  restoration, and so forth.

Several systems are operating in reasonable conditions today due to the presence of traditional generation and transmission systems that can support several types of contingencies.

Matt Chester's picture
Matt Chester on Sep 28, 2020 4:38 pm GMT

Do you think there's a specific limit on how far we can push it though-- build out the clean energy replacements in a way that cuts away at the natural gas dominance (since it was always supposed to be a 'bridge' fuel) until we reach that floor level where gas is still providing the baseload needed. Presumably getting even close to there will take a number of years, and by then numerous of those adequacy problems will likely have been solved. But if we don't start building out the clean energy now because of concerns of what will happen once we reach that point, we may wait too long and regret those delays. 

With that line of thinking, what do you think is the most reasonable level gas can become of the mix with what tech/knowledge we have today without risking those adequacy issues? 

Michael Keller's picture
Michael Keller on Sep 28, 2020 2:29 pm GMT

Natural gas reliably provides reasonably priced and reasonably clean energy with minor needs for land. Renewable energy cannot match these qualities. With out a doubt, gas provides consumers with more money in their pockets, as opposed to lining the pockets of the green energy mafia.

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »