Should PG&E revamp its transmission system or embrace microgrids?
- Nov 9, 2020 3:20 pm GMT
Motivated by frequent fire-fighting blackouts, local governments across northern California are turning to micro-grids to provide their citizens with more reliable power.
Last year—this pandemic has made time move in weird ways—the Blue Lake Rancheria received a good deal of attention when their micro-grid turned the small reservation into an electric oasis during a one-day blackout in the region. Although the miniature grid was built in 2011 with a tsunami in mind, it will undoubtedly get more use in the near future providing relief during the increasingly intense California fire seasons.
Now, the Redwood Coast Energy Authority, a coalition of local governments in and around Humboldt county, has decided to build a new micro-grid. The coalition is collaborating with the Schatz Energy Research Center at Humboldt State University to make it happen. Once completed, the microgrid will sell electricity to ratepayers throughout the year and serve as disaster backup, for homes as well as the local airport and hospital.
I’m wondering how PG&E and California’s operator will react to these projects, assuming they become more common. Should they try to solve the problem at a root level by updating transmission lines to make them safer in dry and windy conditions? Is that even possible? Or should they just accept the growing number of microgrids and work with local governments to make connection easier?
Get Published - Build a Following
The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.
If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.