Part of Grid Network »

The Transmission Professionals special interest group covers the distribution of power from generation to final destination. 


As more states vie for offshore wind projects, transmission remains a major obstacles.

image credit: Courtesy Dreamstime
Christopher Neely's picture
Independent Local News Organization

Journalist for nearly a decade with keen interest in local energy policies for cities and national efforts to facilitate a renewable revolution. 

  • Member since 2017
  • 753 items added with 371,789 views
  • Apr 13, 2022

On land, transmission remains one of the hairiest obstacles between the U.S.—and other countries—and its goals of a renewable future. Transmission exemplifies the history of deferred maintenance in the U.S. energy system and stands as a final and stubborn vestige of our reliance on fossil fuel-sourced electricity. 

As we move offshore, and conversations around offshore wind come to the fore, transmission remains a costly and somewhat prohibitive issue. In North Carolina, energy powerhouse Duke Energy is eyeing entry into the offshore wind market in an effort to meet the renewable revolution and North Carolina’s goals for carbon emissions and clean energy. Yet, the state has offered to put down no money in this effort toward offshore wind, and transmission alone creates cost obstacles.  

Other east coast states committed to offshore wind, including New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts and Virginia, are eyeing a $100 billion cost for a combined 28.5GW by 2035, an estimated $20 billion of that expense will be for transmission alone, according to a report from the Business Network for Offshore Wind advocacy group. The states have helped with this bill, committing to power purchase agreements that give a little more certainty to the projects’ return on investments. North Carolina will need to put its money where its governor’s pen is. 

Yet, a looming issue remains: a forgotten Trump-era executive order for a 10-year moratorium on off-shore energy leases. That goes into effect in July this year, and would require Congress to overturn. The clock is ticking. 


No discussions yet. Start a discussion below.

Christopher Neely's picture
Thank Christopher for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »