Part of Grid Network »

The Transmission Professionals special interest group covers the distribution of power from generation to final destination. 


Can Transmission Build-out be Environmentally-Friendly?

image credit: ATCO Electric
Julian Jackson's picture
Staff Writer, Energy Central, BrightGreen PR

Julian Jackson is a writer whose interests encompass business and technology, cryptocurrencies, energy and the environment, as well as photography and film. His portfolio is here:...

  • Member since 2020
  • 503 items added with 187,190 views
  • Dec 7, 2022

The USA is going to be building a lot more transmission lines. Utilities are going to invest billions of dollars in new T & D infrastructure. Society has become much more sensitive to questions of ecosystem damage: will the new assets have a lower impact on the environment?

This infrastructure development is being driven by several factors, including the need to rebuild lines following severe weather, efforts to protect existing electric infrastructure against severe weather, and bringing significant quantities of renewable electricity from sometimes remote areas or offshore where it is generated, to customers in urban conglomerations. The decisions to where to site the lines and pylons is based on numerous factors, including affordability, reliability and also severe weather events like floods and wildfires.

Building transmission lines across forested areas is a challenge. Nobody wants to cut down trees unnecessarily. However as laying cable underground is usually too expensive – often 10 times the cost of conventional pylons – so will not be possible in many cases. Normally this means cutting down trees on either side of the line, to preserve Right of Way (ROW) and avoid wildfires.

ATCO Electric, a Alberta, Canada-based utility, deployed a 69 kV line in Jasper National Park,with a 25-kV under-build, with both lines using an aerial covered conductor in a tree wire configuration, to minimize the danger of wildfires while also reducing ROW clearance. This meant that the fewest trees were felled, reducing the clearance from 15 meters to 10 meters. By using covered wires, which were more expensive than uncovered ones, but hugely cheaper than running them underground, the forest was preserved as much as possible.

This shows that by paying attention to the ecosystem, new transmission assets can be deployed, while causing the minimum of ecosystem disruption.

Julian Silk's picture
Julian Silk on Dec 8, 2022

Thank you for the post.


Julian Jackson's picture
Thank Julian for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »