Skip to content
  • EC Webcasts
  • Power Perspectives™
  • Special Issues
  • PowerSessions™
  • Sponsors
  • Home
  • Community
    • Q&A
    • Posts
    • Members
    • Experts
  • Groups
    • The Power Industry Network™

      Utility Business Network
      EnergyBiz® Network
      • Utility Professionals
      • Utility Management 
      • Customer Care 
      • HR & Recruitment
      • Resource Management
      Generation Network
      Generation Network
      • Generation Professionals
      • Clean Power Group
      Energy Management Network
      Energy Management Network
      • Load Management
      • Energy Efficiency
      Intelligent Utility Network
      Intelligent Utility® Network
      • Digital Utility
      • Mobile Workforce
      Grid Network
      Grid Network
      • Grid Professionals
      • Transmission Professionals
      Energy & Sustainability Network
      Energy & Sustainability
      Network
      • The Energy Collective
      • Oil & Gas Professionals
      • Clean Energy Business Network
      • Enel Foundation
  • Topics
  • Jobs
  • News
  • Calendar
  • Resources
    • Podcasts
    • Case Studies
    • White Papers
    • Recorded Webinars
  • Subscribe
  • More
    • Subscribe
  • ×
  • Create new content
    • Sign In
    • Apply for Membership
Part of EnergyBiz® Network »

Utility Management Group

Senior decision-makers come together to connect around strategies and business trends affecting utilities.

Join
  • Home
  • Posts
  • Q&A
  • Calendar
  • News
  • Members
  • Experts
  • Sponsors
Author Profile
Joe Steinke's picture
Joe Steinke
Principal Engineer WZI Flow Control Ltd.
Follow
Contact

About me

Principal Engineer, WZI Flow Control LTD, March 2017 – PresentPrincipal Engineer / Senior Valve Doctor,  CCI, IMI Critical Engineering, Jun 1994 – Oct 2016, Rancho Santa Margarita, CAEngineering...

  • Member since 2018
  • 41 items added with 4,016 views

Top Members

WARNING: SIGN-IN

You need to be a member of Energy Central to access some features and content. Please sign-in or register to continue.

Shared Link

  • Share
  • Sign in to Vote Like (1)
  • Comment (5)
  • Aug 31, 2020 1:15 pm GMTAug 31, 2020 1:27 pm GMT
  • 663 views

Leveling the Renewable Roller Coaster, California Style

As California transitions toward out 100% renewable electricity generation goals, a review of where we are today and investments needed is warranted. Review of added generation needs to be done not just based on the average yearly consumption, but on t

Read More
Source: www.linkedin.com

This may be of interest to those looking to transition to 100% green.  We can expect similar grid performance this weekend in California.  

  • report
  • energy-management
  • energy-storage
  • public-power
  • renewables
  • solar-power
  • wind-power
Joe Steinke's picture

Thank Joe for the Post!

Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.

Sign in to Vote Like this post
Follow
More posts from this member
  • Leveling the Renewable Roller Coaster, California Style
  • Leveling the Renewable Roller Coaster
  • How to get low priced electricity in your state.
  • Increased Costs with Power Plant Cycling

Discussions

Spell checking: Press the CTRL or COMMAND key then click on the underlined misspelled word.

Sign in to Participate

Matt Chester's picture
Matt Chester on Aug 31, 2020

While there are a number of unknowns, I would suggest that the variables above will increase the net electricity can easily double the investment costs need to transition to 100% renewable in California. 

What about getting to 80% or 90% renewable-- how much of the costs are in the huge hurdles to overcome to capture that last 10%? From my understanding, it would be more cost effective to simply not aim for that 100% level and focus not he first 90% or so because the carbon impact would be that immense without getting caught in the trap of trying to plan for those last cases. 

  • Sign in or Register to post comments
Joe Steinke's picture
Joe Steinke on Aug 31, 2020

Matt - I agree with you that we should approach the task of renewable genertion gradually.  However, that is not how governments are working.  Mandates are being made with specific timelines without a clear plan on how to accomplish those goals.  SB 100 passed in 2002 requires specific time frames and goals.  Reports are due on progress and cost impact every 4 years.  

  • Sign in or Register to post comments
Matt Chester's picture
Matt Chester on Aug 31, 2020

Agreed-- and there's something to be said for aiming for 100% by 2050 or 2040 or whatever it is even if we don't know how technically achievable that would be since it will put greater pressure to make progress in the short term. But haven't we seen that if governments fail to meet those goals that there's typically little resistance to just kicking the can a bit further down the road based on the new information (on tech, on economics, etc.) that's been uncovered in the time since? 

  • Sign in or Register to post comments
Joe Steinke's picture
Joe Steinke on Sep 1, 2020

Maybe you haven't seen all of the "tipping point", "speed it up", "we have only months..." posts.  Not to be pessimistic, but I think we are going to need to see a couple of disasters before a more detailed review is done.   

  • Sign in or Register to post comments
Bob Meinetz's picture
Bob Meinetz on Dec 25, 2020

"Not to be pessimistic, but I think we are going to need to see a couple of disasters before a more detailed review is done."

I take a different view of outages, Joe. They're wonderful learning experiences for Californians who believe the whole state (or country) can be powered by renewables alone.

I notice you've carefully plotted how batteries could store solar electricity during the day, then provide electricity for evening peaks. What will keep lights on during cloudy, windless days?

Also, in two scenarios of potential solutions to California's reliability problems, you anticipate new nuclear could help to provide stability. Several groups here are supporting a petition to FERC for review of the shutdown of Diablo Canyon, a perfectly-functional, modern, well-maintained, safe nuclear plant that PG&E is preparing to plow into the ground in 2025. It cost $11 billion - a cost entirely financed in the rates of the 16 million customers in PG&E's service area, over the last 30 years. If the company expects those customers will accept even higher rates to keep it solvent, it's mistaken - with even talk of the company going into federal receivership.

The state PUC has apparently washed its hands of trying to generate reliability in California, and is looking to import it from Utah, Wyoming and other Western states, of unknown provenance (likely gas and goal):

Imports will also help to export emissions - as if emissions in Wyoming from generating California electricity will stay in Wyoming. As if.

Note the 2GW of imports predicted to fill the gaps left by Diablo Canyon Units 1 & 2 in 2025-2026. If it seems California's CPUC and Governor are hypocritically engineering a fake-green handout to local natural gas interests, that's putting it mildly.

 

  • Sign in or Register to post comments

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

Start a Post »                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »

Your access to Member Features is limited.

Sign InApply for membership
  • Share a link

Group Sponsors


Become a sponsor
Related Content
The Texas Mess Needs a Czar To Take Charge
45. The UK Green Industrial Revolution - mar21
Private LTE for Electric Utilities: A new reality with a spectrum of possibilities from CBRS to 900 MHz.
Blockchain applications for a renewable future | ELECTRIFYING

Recent Comments

John Ward
John commented on ...
Hydrogen Distribution: 20% Blend Today, 100% Pure Tomorrow?
Hydrogen has such a small molecule that it is harder to contain that natural gas, so electrical fittings designed to exclude hydrogen are rated...
Bob Meinetz
Bob commented on ...
Use of Nuclear Energy to Produce Hydrogen Expected to Gain Ground
Dan, wherever it's used, the energy density of hydrogen gas is abysmal.
Bob Meinetz
Bob commented on ...
Hydrogen Distribution: 20% Blend Today, 100% Pure Tomorrow?
Rauf, there is no evidence hydrogen, as a fuel, is something more than a marketing deception by fossil fuel companies (Shell, BP, others), and...
Bob Meinetz
Bob commented on ...
V2G / V2H, what’s the difference?
Late in the morning, but short on coffee. Thanks.

Sponsors & Partners

EnergyCentralJobs
Esri
Energy Central
Bentley Systems, Inc.
Clevest
Anterix
S&C Electric Company
Fluix
Owl Cyber Defense
ACI Worldwide
CTC Global
AESP
PLMA (Peak Load Management Alliance)
Guidehouse

Energy Central
Our Mission
Our mission at Energy Central is to help global power industry professionals work better. Our Power Industry Network™ platform is built to help our members connect with each other, share their knowledge & experience and advance their careers in the industry. Membership is open to professionals working at utilities and organizations supporting the industry.

Energy Central

  • Membership
  • Community Standards
  • Participate!
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • About Us
  • Advertise with Us

Get Social

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook

Stay Connected

  • Subscribe
  • Follow via RSS
  • Contact Us