This special interest group is for professionals to connect and discuss all types of carbon-free power alternatives, including nuclear, renewable, tidal and more.


Experts Anticipate Larger Wind Turbines and Plants, with Increasing Focus on Grid Value

image credit: Source: Berkeley Lab
EMP at LBL Content Contributor's picture
Electricity Markets & Policy Department, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

The Electricity Markets and Policy Department ( is part of the US Department of Energy's network of national labs.  EMP conducts technical, economic, and policy analysis of energy...

  • Member since 2018
  • 59 items added with 57,533 views
  • May 23, 2022

Berkeley Lab is pleased to announce the publication of a new article in the journal Wind Energy that identifies expectations about future wind turbine and plant designs in 2035 for onshore and offshore wind.

The design of wind turbines and plants have changed considerably over the past three decades, adapting to changing electric power systems and markets, technological improvements, shifting policy incentives, and increasing constraints on and competition for land and ocean space. Anticipating how wind turbines and plants will continue to evolve over the next 10-15 years can inform today’s investment, research, and energy planning decisions. Researchers from Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab), together with collaborators from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory and the U.S. Department of Energy, elicited opinions from more than 140 of the world’s leading experts about their expectations of future wind turbine and plant design in 2035.

Compared to today, wind turbines and plants are expected to get considerably larger. The experts also highlighted several methods to enhance grid-system value that future wind projects are likely to employ. In additional detail, key findings include:

Future Turbine and Site Characteristics:

  • Experts anticipate continued growth in median onshore turbine capacity ratings (5.5 MW in 2035), hub heights (130 m), and rotor diameters (174 m)
  • Offshore turbines are expected to grow in size at an even faster rate, with the typical 2035 offshore turbine having a rated capacity of 17 MW, a hub height of 151 m, and a rotor diameter of 250 m.
  • Yet, several factors were identified that could constrain future turbine growth: Siting and permitting, transportation limitations, and community concerns are considered the primary constraints for onshore turbines, while logistics (e.g., vessel, crane, and port limitations) are seen as the key limitations for offshore turbine scaling
  • For onshore wind, the median annual average wind speed for newly installed projects is expected to decline slightly from 7.9 m/s in 2019 to 7.5 m/s in 2035
  • For fixed-bottom offshore wind, experts anticipate the median project in 2035 to be located farther from shore (70 km [2035] vs. 40 km [2019]) and in deeper water (42 m [2035] vs. 30 m [2019]) but expect average wind speed to remain steady at 9.5 m/s
  • Floating offshore wind is expected to become the lower-cost choice (rather than fixed-bottom) at increasingly shallower water depths (>60m [2035] vs. >80m [2019]), due in part to the higher expected wind speeds (10 m/s) for future floating offshore wind sites


Grid System Value Enhancement Options:

  • As wind energy’s levelized cost declines, additional focus will turn to the value of wind in energy markets
  • For onshore wind, a substantial percentage of experts anticipate significant use or even widespread use of many grid-system value-enhancement options: large rotors, hybridization with storage, curtailment for revenue maximization and life extension, and more (see figure)
  • For offshore wind, top-rated value enhancement options include: larger rotors, provision of balancing services, interconnection to increase grid value, and hybridization with storage and hydrogen production 

The paper goes on to identify five economic mechanisms that drive the forecasted design changes: Economies of scale from growing turbines, larger plant size, and greater siting flexibility, as well as grid-system value economies and production efficiencies. In essence, these mechanisms drive design choices because they generate a reduction in costs or a gain in energy production value that exceed the incremental expense to obtain them.

As described in a companion article by the same co-author team published in Nature Energy, these and many other design choices can support levelized cost of energy reductions of 27% (onshore) and 17%–35% (floating and fixed-bottom offshore) by 2035 compared to today.

The new Wind Energy article can be found here:

The comprehensive global expert survey was made possible through an international research partnership under the auspices of the International Energy Agency’s wind energy program, which has a mission of advancing wind energy research, development and deployment in its member countries. The research was funded by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Wind Energy Technologies Office.


Matt Chester's picture
Matt Chester on May 24, 2022

Is there a sweet spot in terms of efficiency where getting bigger actually wouldn't see valuable gains? Or is it just the bigger you can make it the better? 

EMP at LBL Content Contributor's picture
Thank EMP for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »