This group brings together those who are interested in topics around oil and gas exploration, drilling, refining, and processing.


Visualizing Permian Oil & Gas Production (Through August 2020)

Enno Peters's picture
CEO ShaleProfile

Background in AI, worked on developing Supply Chain Planning & Optimization solutions for Quintiq, setting up its business in China. Focus on company direction and the technical development...

  • Member since 2018
  • 249 items added with 535,575 views
  • Dec 17, 2020

This article contains still images from the interactive dashboards available in the original blog post. To follow the instructions in this article, please use the interactive dashboards. Furthermore, they allow you to uncover other insights as well.

Visit ShaleProfile blog to explore the full interactive dashboard

Total Production

Permian tight oil production held steady for the 3rd consecutive month in September, at close to 3.8 million bo/d (after upcoming revisions). This represents a drop in oil output of about 10% since March, which is just half of what the all the other tight basins lost combined (~20%). At 3.2 million bo/d, they produce well below the level in this basin. Permian natural gas production was at an all-time high at nearly 15 Bcf/d.

Supply Projection

Since our last update on this basin in November, 20 more rigs were added to this play, to a total of 165 (source Baker Hughes). Given where these rigs are drilling and the type curves associated with those areas, we project that a production level can be sustained of ~3.1 million b/d, or 300 thousand b/d more than last month. You can see this (and simulate your own rig projections) in  our Supply Projection dashboard by selecting this basin:

Tight oil outlook in the Permian, by state, based on current drilling activity & productivity

Well productivity

Average well productivity has steadily increased in the basin, although the rate of improvements has dropped significantly since 2016 (see “Well quality”). But this does not consider the increase in lateral lengths. Once you normalize for this factor, you will find these results:

Average well productivity in the Permian, measured by the cumulative oil production in the first 6 months per 1,000 ft. Oil wells only.

It shows that on a normalized basis, results have plateaued at about 12,000 barrels of oil per 1,000 ft lateral in the first 6 months on production, and are recently a little off. This image was taken from the “Productivity over Time” dashboard in ShaleProfile Analytics (Professional). The thickness of the curve represents the relative well count. In this dashboard you can also compare the performance of operators, counties or other basins over time and you can choose your own performance metric to evaluate these wells.

Top Operators

In the final tab (“Top operators”) the production and positions are displayed for the 10 largest producers in the Permian. The planned merger between Pioneer and Parsley will create the largest player in this basin, at over 400 thousand bo/d of operated gross capacity.

Permit Activity

ShaleProfile is now also closely tracking permit activity in the major tight oil & gas basins. In this chart you can see a ranking of operators in the Permian basins by the number of approved permits to drill new horizontal wells, in the 2nd half of this year:

Ranking of Permian operators by # of approved permits (new hz. wells), since July

It shows that EOG has been the most active recently, with almost 350 approved permits since July (all in the Delaware Basin). More information about these permits, including the exact location of these permits in relation to existing wells and expiration dates, can be found in the new “Permit activity” dashboard, available now in ShaleProfile Analytics (Professional). We’re happy to provide trials and demos to understand how you can use this for your benefit.

Advanced Insights

The ‘Advanced Insights’ presentation is displayed below:

This “Ultimate recovery” overview displays the average production rate for these wells, plotted against their cumulative recovery. Wells are grouped by the year in which production started.

Can you display these results by quarter or month of first flow to see more granular and recent data.


We will have a new post on the Eagle Ford later this week, followed by a post on Pennsylvania.

Production and completion data are subject to revisions.

Note that a significant portion of production in the Permian comes from vertical wells and/or wells that started production before 2008, which are excluded from these presentations.


For these presentations, I used data gathered from the following sources:

  • Texas RRC. Oil production is estimated for individual wells, based on a number of sources, such as lease & pending production data, well completion & inactivity reports, regular well tests, and oil production data.
  • OCD in New Mexico. Individual well production data is provided.

Visit our blog to read the full post and use the interactive dashboards to gain more insight:

Follow us on Social Media:

Twitter: @ShaleProfile

LinkedIn: ShaleProfile

Facebook: ShaleProfile

Enno Peters's picture
Thank Enno for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member
Spell checking: Press the CTRL or COMMAND key then click on the underlined misspelled word.

No discussions yet. Start a discussion below.

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »