This group brings together those who are interested in topics around oil and gas exploration, drilling, refining, and processing.


Federal Data Show the High Cost of Electrifying Homes

Energy in Depth's picture
Blog, Independent Petroleum Association of America

Why does Energy In Depth – a research program of the Independent Petroleum Association of America – have a website on climate litigation and the #ExxonKnew campaign? Simple: because these...

  • Member since 2018
  • 533 items added with 856,679 views
  • Aug 24, 2020

New federal data on home energy costs raise red flags on the implications of a movement to force families to switch from natural gas to electric-powered heaters and appliances.

The Department of Energy’s recent publication of the 2020 average unit costs of residential energy assessed the price of natural gas at $10.13 per million British thermal units, $28 cheaper per million Btu than electricity. Such a price difference should make state and local government leaders who are concerned about consumer costs reconsider the drive to electrify residences.

Electrification Doesn’t Help Individuals Save

Building electrification proponents have failed to consider the simple economics that natural gas is the more affordable and reliable energy resource. Households that use natural gas appliances for heating, cooking and clothes drying save an approximate $900 per year compared to homes using electricity for those same applications. And with residential electricity prices expected to increase annually, the gap in savings will only grow in favor of natural gas.

Although multiple reports published by activists arguing for more electrification often claim electricity is a cheaper source, those analyses bundle electrification with improved energy efficiency through building modifications. Oddly, they do not also assume these same energy efficiency measures will apply to natural gas buildings thereby skewing the results.

Twenty-five to 47 percent of all residential energy demand comes from space heating, so improvements to building efficiency can benefit families. However, they will only see the savings if the houses still have natural gas hookups. Any reduced heating costs combined with compliance with new building codes would quickly be lost to higher electricity payments. In this respect, electrification is a regressive tax on homeowners and renters alike.

Shifting Costs

The attempt to limit natural gas consumption to decarbonize households is counterintuitive. By making houses more reliant on the grid, natural gas use will continue its trend of generating a greater share of electricity. Residents would just pay a higher cost for electricity generated using a resource that is cheaper and more efficient when supplied directly to them.


The DOE’s new data show how natural gas remains the most affordable source of energy for home heating and cooking and should serve as a warning for elected leaders looking to follow a costly trend: Families can’t afford a misguided move to force homes onto the electric grid to meet all their energy needs.

The post Federal Data Show the High Cost of Electrifying Homes appeared first on .


No discussions yet. Start a discussion below.

Energy in Depth's picture
Thank Energy in Depth for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »