This group brings together those who are interested in topics around oil and gas exploration, drilling, refining, and processing.

Post

DOJ, State Officials Among Supporters Of Energy Producers In Supreme Court Case As Oral Arguments Scheduled

Energy in Depth's picture
Blog Independent Petroleum Association of America

Why does Energy In Depth – a research program of the Independent Petroleum Association of America – have a website on climate litigation and the #ExxonKnew campaign? Simple: because these...

  • Member since 2018
  • 511 items added with 835,291 views
  • Dec 2, 2020
  • 478 views

Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court announced it will hear oral arguments on January 19, 2021 in its review of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision remanding Baltimore’s climate change lawsuit against major energy producers to state court. Since the high court initially decided to take up the case in October, the nation’s leading government officials, trade associations, and legal organizations have submitted amicus briefs in support of the energy companies’ position that the case should be heard at the federal – not state – level.

As EID Climate previously reported, SCOTUS will be weighing in on the scope of appellate review – in particular, whether an appellate court can review any issue in a trial court’s remand order when the case had been removed in part under the federal-officer removal statute (more on what that is here), or if its review is limited solely to the federal officer removal grounds. The Supreme Court’s decision in this matter will help decide whether more than 20 similar climate lawsuits filed around the country should be heard in state or federal court. The plaintiffs have fought to keep these cases in state court, believing they have a better shot at success in those venues. Meanwhile, the defendant energy companies have argued that the cases should be heard in federal court where the legal precedent is much more favorable.

Therefore, a decision that sends these cases to federal court could deliver a fatal blow to the entire climate litigation campaign. As the Washington Post stated, “Should the Supreme Court rule in favor of the oil companies, it may make it harder for cities and states to secure victory in the climate cases.”

Read the full blog post at EIDClimate.org.

The post DOJ, State Officials Among Supporters Of Energy Producers In Supreme Court Case As Oral Arguments Scheduled appeared first on .

Read More

Energy in Depth's picture
Thank Energy in Depth for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member
Discussions
Spell checking: Press the CTRL or COMMAND key then click on the underlined misspelled word.

No discussions yet. Start a discussion below.

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »