The Promise of Blockchain - A Reality Check
- Sep 30, 2019 2:30 pm GMTSep 30, 2019 2:30 pm GMT
- 1046 views
This item is part of the Blockchain in Utilities - Special Issue - 09/2019, click here for more
The blockchain hype was inescapable at one point of time.
The technology was often held up as a possible solution to almost all of humanity’s problems from helping manage the refugee crisis to fixing advertising. Within the energy industry, blockchain was expected to streamline and, in some cases, rework the energy grid. An example of the latter was the establishment of peer-to-peer marketplaces for energy consumers, enabling them to make their own purchase decisions.
Of course, none of that has actually come to pass. Peer-to-peer marketplaces are still being developed and there is no word yet on the refashioned grid. Instead, data privacy has emerged as an elephant in the room because putting energy data on a public blockchain constitutes violation of privacy.
So was blockchain a failed promise?
An Incomplete Understanding of Blockchain?
Part of the problem lies in an incomplete understanding of blockchain, the technology. As it is currently portrayed in the media, blockchain is a radical innovation. It is not. In very crude terms, it is a distributed database that decentralizes trust and integrates various players onto the same platform.
As an example, consider the renewable energy certificate market which has multiple players and standards. The use of a blockchain can create a single platform for trading these certificates by utilizing attributes from multiple databases. To that extent then, blockchain is best used in complex markets that span borders and regulations. In other words, the promise of blockchain is best realized in a flexible grid with different levels of power structures.
Here’s an example.
During the recent GTM blockchain for energy conference, Neil Gerber from IBM discussed a use case with TenneT - a transmission system operator (TSO) in Germany and the Netherlands. According to Gerber, they chose blockchain because the TSO wanted to provide “thousands and thousands” of flex services or ancillary products at electric vehicle (EV) charging stations. Essentially the idea is to connect to one network and get access to multiple jurisdictions, he said. To accomplish the development of such a marketplace, TenneT joined hands with TSOs in neighboring countries and formed a governance system that translates to a collaborative business for everyone involved.
Current Blockchain Use Cases
Meanwhile, a couple of near-term use cases have become low-hanging fruit for the technology. The first one is fairly well-known and pertains to blockchain’s use in the renewable energy certificate markets. According to some, blockchain has the potential to agglomerate multiple standards and requirements onto a single platform. But that promise must be tempered with a realistic assessment of possibilities. One of the most illuminating moments at the GTM conference occurred during a panel discussion about adoption of blockchain in utility operations. CK Umachi, a product manager at PG&E, told audiences that his effort from reconciling various vendor contracts for renewable energy credits for the utility resulted in a “nightmare and headache” due to the task’s complexity. Eventually he gave up on the project. Unfortunately, Umachi’s opinion about the difficulty of converting physical documentation into smart contracts is not unique. During another panel discussion, Andrew Bruce, CEO of Data Gumbo - a startup that works with smart contracts in the oil&gas industry , said converting the terms of a physical contracts into executable code for smart contracts took up most of their time and was the most difficult part of their job.
The second important use case for blockchain is its integration of Distributed Energy Resources (DERs), such as wind farms and solar panels, into a grid. Most DERs exist in a silo at the grid’s edge, disconnected from the main system. This is mainly because they are operated by prosumers and also because integrating them into the grid would require modification of control software which may not be possible. Besides this, there are other issues to consider, such as data transfer between legacy systems. The complexity referred to earlier is evident in this case because control and management of the power system is distributed between multiple stakeholders.
The use of blockchain in transactive energy systems (TES) is being touted as a possible solution to this problem. Smart contracts, which automate various tasks associated with the energy grid, can be used in conjunction with the decentralized trust engendered by blockchain. Blockchain’s decentralized system will ensure that multiple stakeholders (as opposed to all or just one) control the levers at the grid’s edge.
Such a system may work through nodes or validator systems responsible for approving a transaction. The nodes will be the responsibility of various stakeholders, in this case the grid operator and DERs connecting to it. They will approve all transactions and create a shared and semi-transparent ledger for all stakeholders, thereby eliminating the headache of maintaining records for multiple DERs for a utility.
A Nascent Technology
While these use cases have generated considerable enthusiasm, there are still a number of problems that blockchain must overcome before it can make serious inroads into the energy industry. The problem of data privacy and ownership is still to be solved. Governance is another problem. How can the needs of multiple stakeholders be arranged in a way to ensure fair governance of complex platforms?
For example, a regulator might need different access levels as compared to an aggregator or a utility on the same platform. Ditto for a customer versus an ISO/RTO. Public blockchains also have scaling issues. Then there’s the fact that energy is a heavily-regulated industry and any possible changes to its current configuration and architecture will require government vetting and approval.
The promise of blockchain is a complex, multi-tiered energy platform in which multiple stakeholders can participate. But it might take years before that platform is realized.