The mission of this group is to bring together utility professionals in the power industry who are in the thick of the digital utility transformation. 


IoT - Is the Internet of Things a tired topic in the industry?

Audra Drazga's picture
Vice President of The Power Industry Network, Energy Central

I am the VP of the Energy Central Power Industry Network.  In this role, I help to connect professionals in the power industry through the development and management of topic-specific community...

  • Member since 2012
  • 991 items added with 622,637 views
  • Jun 17, 2022

A couple of days ago, a partner of Energy Central and I were talking about if IoT was a tired topic in the industry.  Then today, I saw a post by one of our members Alan King on "What is next generation field service management software?" In the post, he mentions  IoT technologies and the forecasted growth projected in the coming years between 2021 and 2026.  

I am wondering if IoT is still something utilities are highly focused on, should they be focusing on IoT technologies, and if so, where is that focus mostly happening? 

Chime in below - I would love to hear your thoughts. 

Your access to Member Features is limited.

Best Answer

Thanks @Audra for the post. Utilities in Australia are focused on several areas with IoT. Metering with electrical utilities has been around for well over a decade now, with different penetration rates between each State. We've seen different degrees of success using sensors on infrastructure.

Water has also seen the move commence to digital metering a few years back, along with sensors for vibrations and leak detection, remote monitoring etc too. We've also been involved with IoT in remote water sample reading, followed by a view to eventually move to remote dosing.

Gas was the final frontier and that is now underway using sensors on meters for remote reading, which is a very exciting project to be part of.  

Spending time in the UK and Europe of late and talking with utilities, it's been interesting to hear of similarities but also key differences around data processing, especially in relation to GDPR.

I’ll offer some rudimentary thoughts. IoT is an obscure moniker, like most, that needs to go away. Likewise, Secure Digitalization will mean nothing to most people other than those paid to market, sell, connect, or protect the devices. For everyone to be engaged in the importance of the discussion, we can’t keep reminding people what we’re talking about when we discuss these interconnected devices. The reference must be simplified. I offer nothing of worth for a name. I’m only reminded I am constantly educating the professionals and consumers regarding what and why it’s essential to understand the opportunities and risks. 

As a utility we are consistent layering on IoT services for consumers, both for sale and as a recurring service. We have a very robust support structure. We’re expanding or efforts in security monitoring and mitigation.  

Hi @Audra,

Late to the topic, but I would not say that IoT is a tired topic in the industry. I'm an active member of the IoT Alliance Australia, and regularly (monthly) attend a forum of water utilities discussing IoT in the water sector here in Australia and we are not even talking about digital metering as it's a tired topic :-) because it's 'been done' to death, and every utility here in Australia is either rolling them out, or about to roll out, or completed their pilot.

There are various IoT use cases being deployed, piloted or in the POC/POV process. These include IoT being used for water quality monitoring (in dams, creeks, etc.) flood level monitoring, sewage pipe inspection, etc.

The water sector here is developing an IoT guideline for the entire Australian water sector (it is also based on an IoT guideline/tool that I have developed for a utility prior as well as a Digital Reference Framework for the Water Sector, again based on an IoT Ref Framework which I also helped develop). And happening most recently, an IoT Water Hub has been set up to help develop/create IoT value for the water industry, which comprises of Academia, industry partners, and organisations like the IoT Alliance Australia.

But I must say the take-up of IoT-based projects is still nascent in the water sector, as there is still much to be done/educated. There is still a SCADA vs IoT mentality (and will be for a while), as IoT is still seen as not being secure enough (rightly or wrongly) to be used for control purposes (as in controlling actuators). I would say each Water Utility would have a different maturity approach to IoT.

In the Energy sector, my involvement is only scratching the surface at the moment, but I have seen presentations from energy generation companies using IoT as a complimentary solution mostly for monitoring the environment, especially in the case of renewable energy.

I have been involved in reviewing cybersecurity in the Microgrid space, and I treat DERS (Battery systems, EV charger, solar PVs, etc.,) as IoT endpoints. I recently found out that NIST 'classifies' DERs (in microgrids) as Industrial IoT (so I was most happy).

I'm currently 'trying' to see how IoT can be applied in (what we call in Australia) Renewable Energy Zones (REZ)s. If you're interested, you can search for REZs in Australia.



In the rates area the IoT is definitely not a tired topic. Rate analysts are excited (well, most of them anyway) at the treasure-trove of data available and the potential for designing real-time rates, based on customer choice of how electricity is used and when it is used. I see this topic growing in importance as we learn how to maximize the data potential.

About 6-8 years ago IOT was a buzz word but today it is a "must" for many innovative, and real problem solving applications delivering what we call "outcomes" or the automation. IOT generates values data which can be used to provide insight into what and why for many services. IOT has gain more adaption in recent years as we all know. Use case based IOT integrations can deliver ROI for utilities with much needed customer satisfaction at the same time.
Jesse Nyokabi's picture
Jesse Nyokabi on Jul 27, 2022

Use case based IOT integrations can deliver ROI for utilities with much needed customer satisfaction at the same time but more needs to be done. This would open up more discussion even at the investors’ level.

I spend a lot of my time working on cybersecurity issues and the entire conversation around IoT gives me reason to be concerned. If indeed the "T" in "IoT" are really connected to the Internet ("I" in IoT) then be prepared for an onslaught of cyber attacks on these Internet connected "Things". Personally I would like to see the "IoT" moniker replaced by "Secure Digitalization".

Samir Trivedi's picture
Samir Trivedi on Jul 29, 2022

I agree that security is integral part of IOT solutions. We are on daily basis exposed to some vulnerability because connected technology now way of life and it can not be denied. I am oping agreement:-)

Cities for example were not open to making themselves "smart" 10 years ago but now we see more automated parking as a minimum in most cities with connected edge device and payment systems. In my experience I have not seen any one calling at the parking spot in past few years. Every one starts punching and inserting credit cards. I think we are getting better at security but also agree that it will never be zero security breach so pick our pill. Thake blue pill and you never have to use the IOT. take red pill and the experience would be amazing:-)

Tap Into The Experience of the Network

One of the great things about our industry is our willingness to share knowledge and experience.

The Energy Central Q&A platform allows you to easily tap into the experience of thousands of your colleagues in utilities.

When you need advice, have a tough problem or just need other viewpoints, post a question. Your question will go out to our network of industry professionals and experts. If it is sensitive, you can post anonymously.