Part of Grid Network »

The Grid Professionals Group covers electric current from its transmission step down to each customer's home. 


Is your power grid ready for the next superstorm?

image credit:
Dustin Prescott's picture
Market Director - ABB - Providing grid integration solutions ABB

Dustin is the sales and market director for ABB’s grid integration business in the US.  In his role, Dustin is dedicated to leveraging ABB’s technology and solutions to enable customers to...

  • Member since 2019
  • 2 items added with 8,161 views
  • Jul 30, 2019

In October 2012, Hurricane Sandy hit the eastern coast of the United States after leaving a path of destruction in the Caribbean. The storm knocked out power for 8.5 million people in 21 states and topped off months of extreme weather that began with Hurricane Irene, which left 4 million people without power.

Such superstorms, which used to happen once in a century, have become more frequent in the years since Sandy. In 2017, two of them – Hurricanes Irma and Maria – hit the U.S. within a month of each other. Apart from the widespread destruction to homes and businesses, Maria toppled 80 percent of the Puerto Rico’s power lines and flooded its generators, leaving the island’s residents with the longest and largest blackout in U.S. history.

A study published in science journal ‘Nature’ found that average speed of tropical cyclone movement has slowed since the middle of last century. This phenomenon makes North Atlantic hurricanes more likely to "stall" near coastlines and caused the record-breaking floods during Hurricane Florence in the Carolinas and Hurricane Harvey in Texas.

These hurricanes, and their increasingly destructive power, have underscored the need to be better prepared for the next superstorm. And the last few years have shown, it is not a question of if but when the next storm will hit. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)’s Climate Prediction Center predicts two to four major hurricanes will hit the U.S. coast in 2019.

Preparing utilities

There are many ways utilities can reduce the vulnerability of the overall system - or “harden” existing infrastructure - to deal with superstorms. A U.S. Office of the President report showcased the economic benefits of increasing electric grid resilience to weather outages and suggested measures like strengthening and elevation of substations, among others. The benefits of such steps were on display in Florida, where such system “hardening” significantly limited damage from Irma.

The work begins with the identifying critical substations which are particularly vulnerable to storm surge or are located in high flood zones as per Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)'s Flood Insurance Rate Maps.

After assessing the flood risks and elevation patterns, utilities can focus on innovative solutions for substations that can provide early warning capabilities, mitigate potential outages, and reduce restoration times after a severe weather event.

The easiest way to improve substations intelligence in coastal and low-lying areas is to integrate flood monitoring and control systems. Several strategically placed float switches in a substation can be hardwired into its control system and monitored remotely, providing critical real-time status while keeping workers out of harm’s way during a major storm. Such an arrangement proved to be a lifesaver for operators of a critical substation in Corpus Christi, who received real-time data on flood conditions when Hurricane Harvey hit Texas.

Another proven method is to combine the benefits of cost-effective modular equipment of medium voltage substations, which can be installed on elevated foundations, platforms or stilts with relative ease. Protective enclosures for the control system along with standby generators to provide auxiliary power can help keep the system up and running, especially in remote environments.

But elevation of conventional Air Insulated units, which are much heavier and bigger, can pose a major challenge for higher voltage substations. And even after proper elevation, major equipment still remains exposed and complicates maintenance access.

An effective solution to this problem is to utilize gas insulated equipment, which dramatically reduces the size of the substation. This modern equipment allows the entire substation to move inside a building. This ensures that all crucial equipment is protected from the elements and at an elevation above projected flood levels. A number of such facilities, run by Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, managed to survive the superstorms that ravaged the island in 2017.

Florida‘s investment of nearly $3 billion over a decade to make the energy grid smarter, stronger and more storm-resilient meant most of the substations were up and running within a day of Irma. As a part of the same effort, distribution poles were also strengthened, which contained the damage: only 2500 of them were toppled out of 1.2 million, as compared to roughly 12,000 during Hurricane Wilma that hit the sunshine state in 2005.

The US Department of Energy estimated in 2013 that weather-related power outages cost the economy between $18 billion and $33 billion each year. That seems small change when compared with the last couple of years, when Irma alone caused $50 billion in damages. Considering that superstorms will continue to pound our coastlines, utilities and large power users must stay vigilant on how they plan and prepare for the next major storm, how they limit the damage and recover.

Do you have some best practices to share on how to harden your substations against natural disasters? Please share in comments below.

Matt Chester's picture
Matt Chester on Jul 30, 2019

All organizations would surely say this is a top priority to them, as blackouts especially in times of natural disaster can be crippling. I wonder, though if independent study finds that the money being invested in these initiatives measures up to what is actually needed. Given how outdated many parts of the U.S. grid are just for typical operation, not even consider emergency preparedness, I have to assume there's still a gap. Do you have any resources or insights on this, Dustin?

Dustin Prescott's picture
Dustin Prescott on Jul 31, 2019

Matt,  Great points, I am not aware of any independent studies on this, but I agree there is still a gap in the need for substation hardening and the budget available to implement these measures.  Utilities must analyze the criticality and vulnerability of their substations and make an investment plan to maximize the effectiveness of their funding.  This was evident in the hardened substations that made it through recent substations.  Several utilities have recognized the need and are implementing many of the actions indicated above.

John Simonelli's picture
John Simonelli on Aug 11, 2019

I think you will find most utilities have done this type of analysis. The trick is pulling all the scattered information together and getting it out to the industry at large in the form of lessons learned.

Dustin Prescott's picture
Thank Dustin for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »