Part of Grid Network »

The Grid Professionals Group covers electric current from its transmission step down to each customer's home. 


Innovative Solutions to Deferring Grid Investment while Achieving Reliability, Renewable and Environmental Goals

image credit:

Shreyas  Vangala's picture
Senior Consultant, Energy & Utilities at West Monroe Partners West Monroe Partners

My career is centered around catalyzing the transition to a more reliable and less emissions-intensive electric grid.I have and continue to work directly with utilities and advocacy groups to...

  • Member since 2020
  • 1 items added with 2,145 views

This item is part of the Special Issue - 2020-03 - Innovation in Power, click here for more

The electrical grid is undeniably essential to our society and economy. The electric transmission and distribution (T&D) network moves energy from multiple sources of generation to homes, businesses, hospitals, universities, schools, and government agencies. It is the utility’s responsibility within its regulatory compact to ensure that power is transmitted safely and reliably to the end-use customers it serves within its territory. Under current regulations this responsibility will continue, even when an increasing share of generation is at the “grid edge.”

While we are relying more on the grid, and with emerging requirements for two-way power flow, it is aging – 70% of the grid’s transmission lines and power transformers are over 25 years old.[1] This aging infrastructure, coupled with increasing frequency of major weather events, have contributed to increasing utility outages.  Traditionally, utilities use investment capital to repair or expand the grid (i.e.  new substation, high voltage transmission lines etc.).

Historically, regulators worked closely with utilities through a series of regularly scheduled rate cases to approve capital investments and the associated rate of return (ROR) on capital that permit utilities to recover their T&D investments. Since utilities can collect both the invested capital and a ROR on it, there is an incentive for more capital-intensive investment. Today, an increasing number of regulators require that utilities consider alternatives to these traditional T&D investments in meeting their customer electric service needs, while simultaneously achieving other state policies related to renewable energy and decarbonization targets.

With the declining costs for many renewable energy technologies and growing demand by consumers for increased choice regarding how their electricity is generated, there is more decentralization of generation. This decentralization has required increased investment in grid devices (such as distributed automation) to control the bi-directional and real-time flow of electricity arising from the growth in digital and smart devices at the grid edge. Now, when utilities look to make grid upgrades in “poles and wires” as part of their rate cases, they are increasingly being asked to compare the cost of these solutions in parallel with those of newer, innovative (and often less capital intensive) technologies.

These alternatives technologies, referred to as non-wires alternatives (NWAs), can be categorized most broadly through the lens of either supply-side or demand side management solutions, and generally take the form of a distributed energy resource (DER).  A supply-side solution might involve the application of solar PV (either rooftop or community) and battery storage to avoid disruptions in power delivery, and/or alleviating congestion on circuits with additional current or forecasted power needs. By siting power generation close to the site of consumption (grid edge) and making it available when most needed through battery application, the need for substation upgrades, new poles, and wires can be deferred. A similar end point may be reached by enrolling a number of customers with smart thermostats in a demand-side management program whereby an aggregator calls an “event” and adjusts the thermostats in a way that helps shed load in a way that individuals may barely notice, while in aggregate it can avoid the previously mentioned upgrades to substations, poles, and wires to serve this “peak” event.

As regulators push to deploy DER technologies through avoided cost comparisons they can also achieve other state policy objectives. For example, since the technologies often associated with NWAs are carbon-free on the supply side, or avoid carbon emissions on the demand side, CO­2 mitigation is yet another marker of the value where NWAs provide societal and end-customer benefits.

As utilities explore how to scale their adoption of NWAs meaningfully across their service territories and include them in rate cases, they currently encounter a series of challenges. These challenges are often related to how avoided costs and related benefits are calculated. Regulator guidance may not be particularly clear or cover all manners of NWA solutions, especially given how rapidly some of these technologies are changing. Even when there is guidance from regulators, recognizing and capturing those benefits fully, accurately, and with internal utility consensus from a financial planning and analysis standpoint may be difficult. However, achieving NWA implementation at scale from a physical standpoint may be challenging as well. Customer willingness to provide rooftop access for solar, willingness to participate in demand curtailment events, and shading/land ownership of sites are amongst the factors that can keep NWAs from being implemented behind the meter and on the distribution network.

Looking away from retail power transactions, and turning attention upstream to the bulk power market, there have been a number of shifts in how independent system operators and regional transmission organizations (ISO/RTO) have shifted their own operations in response to the growing penetration of renewable energy on the distribution grid. Additionally, developers of such projects are also leveraging battery technology at scale to firm up revenues from their generation assets and participate in the ancillary services markets that were previously not an option (reactive power, reserve capacity, etc.). These entities have also started to pilot the idea of allowing multiple DERs on a node to deliver wholesale market services in aggregate.[2]

While such pilots represent a step in the right direction, and provide yet another mechanism by which NWAs may economically defer larger capital investments, the emphasis lies yet again on the supply-side of the equation and does not  provide means for the demand-side avoided megawatt of consumption to be valued equally. Furthermore, such pilots operate under the assumption of “one-asset, one market value stream”, which precludes the ability of a battery asset to provide both power during peak evening hours in addition voltage support.

If bulk power markets evolve to more comprehensively enable NWAs to participate beyond their roles as grid investment deferrals and leverage the full range of NWA capabilities and value (see figure), it is not farfetched to think that NWAs may present a more attractive rate of return as compared to traditional solutions. Coupled with the potential for revenue generation in the market, NWAs can also enable utilities to leverage their customers’ engagement and participation in grid deferral to generate system level grid value without relying on rate-based operations. While such market-based programs are still being developed, the price signals from a market operator (ISO/RTO) are more bankable and thus more scalable to developers who would construct such NWA solutions to meet utility needs.

While this sort of paradigm shift in a distribution utility’s business model would require a massive overhaul in market and utility operations, and would require a largely new regulatory frameworks, the possibility remains that this is yet another means by which NWAs can play a central role in a more reliable, resilient, clean, and cost-effective grid.


Uros Simovic, Sr Consultant, West Monroe

Shreyas Vangala, Sr Consultant, West Monroe

Estelle Mangeney, Sr Manager, West Monroe

David South, Sr Principal, West Monroe




Shreyas  Vangala's picture
Thank Shreyas for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member


Spell checking: Press the CTRL or COMMAND key then click on the underlined misspelled word.
Matt Chester's picture
Matt Chester on Apr 2, 2020

While this sort of paradigm shift in a distribution utility’s business model would require a massive overhaul in market and utility operations, and would require a largely new regulatory frameworks, the possibility remains that this is yet another means by which NWAs can play a central role in a more reliable, resilient, clean, and cost-effective grid.

No doubt some of the most important and impactful changes we could make would end up coming from not being afraid of the daunting tasks ahead, as you well put. So I don't think that's a reason not to pursue these types of programs-- that said, pragmatically how do you think is the best way to go about such large-scale transformations? Where do you start in drumming up support and the regulatory changes that would end up being needed?

Uroš Simović's picture
Uroš Simović on Apr 6, 2020

To navigate the technological, regulatory and financial complexities that surround NWA, it is important to engage all relevant stakeholders early and often to ensure all parties are striving toward a common goal. This can start either within the regulator or the utility and then, as those goals are defined internally, expand to include stakeholders within the other organization as well as NWA service providers and the community which would be served.

Matt Chester's picture
Matt Chester on Apr 6, 2020

Thanks for the reply, Uros. Definitely a full time job to keep the group of stakeholders with the eyes on that ultimate prize, but I agree that it's well worth it!

Allie Detrio's picture
Allie Detrio on Apr 3, 2020

Great post Shreyas! There is so much opportunity ahead for DERs and microgrids in energy markets.  We need regulators that are forward thinking and willing to embrace all the new technologies and market participants that want to play in the energy space. Regulators like to regulate and the advent of DERs and grid edge tech makes them hesitant to embrace new technologies, in part, because then they must give up some control and open the doors to others. Regulators and utilities are notoriously risk adverse and they are content. They like the status quo because the utility gets to build and the regulator gets to regulate. Its been that way for basically a century. New technologies and players in the markets are having an effect on that well-established relationship. DERs are here and they aren't going away. The forward thinking regulators are the ones that are inclusive, they embrace the opporutnity DERs can provide, and want other entities besides the utilities in the mix. If we get the right policies in place for DERs we can absolutely achieve the vision you laid out in your post. Great writing, thanks for sharing!

Chris Law's picture
Chris Law on Apr 3, 2020

Great post and thanks for sharing Shreyas!

Its amazing to consider this stat:

70% of the grid’s transmission lines and power transformers are over 25 years old.

From my travels, this will hold true generally in most parts of the world.

DER is going to be the future and in many places its here.  In Australia, we are now seeing close to 50% of all generation from rooftop solar in some states.  However, there are unintended consequences once you get > 20% penetration.  Things like Voltage Management, Capacity, and thermal limits and of course Balancing becomes critical. Unfortunately in the US, the secondary network is not well mapped in many states e.g. Network Model in their GIS which means there is work is to be done to prepare and then manage ultimately the hosting capacity effectively

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »