Part of Grid Network »

The Grid Professionals Group covers electric current from its transmission step down to each customer's home. 

Post

Are Virtual Power Plants the Solution in California?

image credit: Photo 131758182 © Photosvit | Dreamstime.com
Henry Craver's picture
Small Business Owner Self-employed

As a small business owner, I'm always trying to find ways to cut costs and boost the dependability of my services. To that end, I've become increasingly invested in learning about energy saving...

  • Member since 2018
  • 603 items added with 298,263 views
  • May 18, 2021
  • 296 views

Things aren’t looking good in California. Heading into Summer 2021, CAISO estimates that the state’s power network is only slightly better prepared than it was a year ago for a major heatwave. This sad analysis comes after the California Public Utilities Commission did what basically every industry expert wanted them to do. They got additional generation procurement. In February, CPUC directed utilities operating in the state to contract extra capacity from existing power plants. The move drew a lot of criticism from environmentalists who worried it could lead to more gas contracts. In March, the CPUC greenlighted another decision that included the additional procurement of up to 1,500 MW for 2021 and 2022.

So what’s left for the Golden State? A number of commentators are enthusiastic about the potential of “virtual power plants.” Here’s how the idea is described in a recent L.A. Times article on the state’s electricity challenges: “string together hundreds or thousands of batteries, as well as “flexible demand” programs that pay people to use less electricity.”

Some utilities in California have already started moving towards virtual power plants. Last year, three government run utilities signed deals with Sunrun, a virtual power plant company. More recently, Southern California Edison contracted Sunrun for a five-megawatt system. 

These systems will provide just a tiny fraction of energy in the grand scheme of things. And, what’s more, it remains to be seen how they compare to traditional gas options after sunset.

 

Henry Craver's picture
Thank Henry for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member
Discussions
Spell checking: Press the CTRL or COMMAND key then click on the underlined misspelled word.
Bob Meinetz's picture
Bob Meinetz on May 18, 2021

"...string together hundreds or thousands of batteries, as well as “flexible demand” programs that pay people to use less electricity."

If stringing thousands of batteries together, bribing people to not use electricity, and paying 500 clowns to pedal exercise bikes connected to the grid doesn't work out, however, CAISO is also planning to import up to 10 GW of real, coal-fired power from plants in Nevada, Utah, and Wyoming via PacifiCorp's Energy Gateway South transmission project (just in case).

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »