This special interest group is for professionals to connect and discuss all types of carbon-free power alternatives, including nuclear, renewable, tidal and more.

Markus Dirnbacher's picture
Director ENcome Energy Performance

AMA - I‘ll be happy to answer all questions. For information upfront please check my LinkedIn profile. All the best, Markus

  • Member since 2020
  • 48 items added with 19,481 views
  • Nov 26, 2021
  • 412 views

Climate change has already severely and drastically impacted the world we live in. Natural disasters, misaligned temperatures, and mass extinction of animal species are occurring at an unprecedented pace. In light of this, the shift from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources is essential and, some may argue, inevitable. Solar energy is one of the low-carbon energy sources that can help the transition towards becoming carbon-neutral.

Markus Dirnbacher's picture
Thank Markus for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member
Discussions
Spell checking: Press the CTRL or COMMAND key then click on the underlined misspelled word.
Bob Meinetz's picture
Bob Meinetz on Nov 26, 2021

Markus, if I'm looking for the most cost-effective SUV for my family, would I bother considering a Bentley Bentayga (MSRP $160,000)? It's a beautiful vehicle, and would certainly impress clients and friends. But if my goal is to get my kids to school and soccer practice on time, and to still have enough money left to pay my exorbitant electricity bill, I'd more likely be looking at the Ford Escape ($25,500) or the Nissan Rogue ($26,600) to get the job done.

Similarly, your graph shows that countries have spent a lot of money on solar energy. But has it been a cost-effective investment? You tell me:

Global primary energy

Though there's a label for "Solar" on the above graph, it's contribution to global primary energy is invisible. Negligible. Useless, for the purpose of displacing fossil fossils making up >80% of the world's energy sources.

I think it's time for the earnest advocates of solar energy to accept that simply because the sun occasionally radiates a tiny bit of energy nearly everywhere on earth doesn't make it a cost-effective investment; that when it comes to displacing oil, or coal, or gas, it's been a pathetic failure.

I think it's time to accept that there's no more time to waste.

Markus Dirnbacher's picture
Markus Dirnbacher on Dec 1, 2021

Bob, what will humanity (not us) do, once fossil fuels are used up? 

 

 

Bob Meinetz's picture
Bob Meinetz on Dec 1, 2021

 

"...what will humanity (not us) do, once fossil fuels are used up?"

Markus, that's anyone's guess. But with over 100 billion barrels of oil still lying underneath the sands of Saudi Arabia alone I believe humanity would never survive long enough to extract and burn every last drop. Centuries earlier, dwindling food supplies and rising sea levels, casualties of climate change, would lead to mass starvation and armed conflict. What would happen at that point no one knows. But safe to say, it wouldn't be pretty.

I'm more convinced than ever it comes down to a choice between nuclear energy and fossil fuels. But if continued reliance on fossil fuels will guarantee our extinction, it isn't much of a choice after all. Is it?

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »