The Generation Professionals Group is for utility professionals who work in biomass, coal, gas/oil, hydro, natural gas, or nuclear power generation fields. 

Post

Palisades Nuclear Plant denied funds to restart

Doug Houseman's picture
Visionary and innovator in the utility industry and grid modernization Burns & McDonnell

I have a broad background in utilities and energy. I worked for Capgemini in the Energy Practice for more than 15 years. During that time I rose to the position of CTO of the 12,000 person...

  • Member since 2017
  • 237 items added with 82,493 views
  • Nov 22, 2022
  • 105 views

Palisades in Grand Haven Michigan - an 880 MW nuclear plant that produced 6,994 GWH per year, on average over its lifetime will not restart.

That means to get enough energy to replace Palisades on a cold winter day (there is no long-term storage to shift energy from April to December) more than 98,000 Acres (39,000 hectares) of farm land will have to be converted solar production, and more than 18 GW of day night shifting storage will be required.

Total cost: $33 BILLION dollars and investment tax credits of over $10 billion.

Oh, and yes Michigan, like Germany will burn more coal for the next few years.

Congratulations to Governor Whitmer and here administration & to the MPSC. 😒

Oh, and lets not forget to thank former Governor of Michigan (and current Energy Secretary) Granholm.

Doug Houseman's picture
Thank Doug for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member
Discussions
Spell checking: Press the CTRL or COMMAND key then click on the underlined misspelled word.
Audra Drazga's picture
Audra Drazga on Nov 23, 2022

Doug, from another post on our site, it sounds like Gov Whitmer was pro recommissioning the plant and the DOE was the one that denied funding.  It also sounds like there may be funding for a small model nuclear reactor in Oyster Creek.  Curious what your thoughts are on this?  Also, does it make more sense to build new small-model nuclear reactors or to try to retrofit and upgrade older plants?  Pro and cons?  What happens to these old plants if they never restart - do they eventually get demolished, or do they just stay there forever, taking up land space etc?

 

Here is a link to the other article I referred to above - https://energycentral.com/c/ec/doe-rejects-funding-holtec-restart-palisades  

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »