The Generation Professionals Group is for utility professionals who work in biomass, coal, gas/oil, hydro, natural gas, or nuclear power generation fields. 

Post

Fukushima Ten Years On - There’s No Town Left: Fukushima’s Eerie Landscapes

image credit: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/10/world/asia/fukushimaenergy-japan-nuclear-anniversary.html?searchResultPosition=1

It´s ten years today since the earthquake, tsunami and meltdown of the nuclear power plant at Fukushima.  It´s worth having a look at this and related articles to remind us of what happened.

Even now — a decade after those deadly natural disasters on March 11, 2011, set off a catastrophic nuclear meltdown — the Japanese government has not fully reopened villages and towns within the original 12-mile evacuation zone around the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant. And even if it did, many former residents have no plans to return.

Within Japan, the disaster’s legacy still feels painfully immediate. A government proposal to release about one million tons of contaminated water into the sea has riled local fishermen, and cases against the government and the plant operator are winding through the country’s highest courts. The issue of nuclear power remains highly fraught.

And for miles around the plant, there are physical reminders of an accident that forced the exodus of about 164,000 people.

Continue reading the main storyIn Katsurao, about 20 miles inland from Ms. Kobayashi’s home, radioactive soil sits in temporary waste sites. (top photo).

Your access to Member Features is limited.

Please or apply for membership to continue reading this post.

An accompanying article describes the remaining hazards:

While background levels of radiation have fallen across the prefecture and scientists have deemed short-term risks minimal, they are divided about the long-term consequences for public health.

“We know relatively little about the long-term effects of exposure” to low doses of radiation, said Timothy Mousseau, a biologist at the University of South Carolina who has studied how radioactive contamination has affected animals and plants in Chernobyl and Fukushima.

A third article describes the distrust of the nuclear industry and the government with respect to nuclear waste.

The Japanese government was conducting a study of potential locations for storing spent nuclear fuel — a review of old geological maps and research papers about local plate tectonics. It put out a call for localities to volunteer. Participating would commit them to nothing.

Haruo Kataoka, the mayor of an ailing fishing town on the northern island of Hokkaido, put up his hand. His town, Suttsu, could use the money. What could go wrong?

The answer, he quickly learned, was a lot.

On top of a newly galvanized anxiety came a fresh mistrust of both the nuclear industry, which had built reactors susceptible to being overwhelmed in a natural disaster, and the government, which had allowed it to happen.

A parliamentary commission found that the meltdowns had been the result of a lack of oversight and of collusion between the government, the plant’s owner and regulators.

 It is so difficult to maintain an appropriate level of anxiety regarding the risks of nuclear energy and the possible results of it going wrong.  But it would be wrong to ignore the experience of the people of Fukushima.

Mark Silverstone's picture
Thank Mark for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member

Discussions

Spell checking: Press the CTRL or COMMAND key then click on the underlined misspelled word.
Bob Meinetz's picture
Bob Meinetz on Mar 11, 2021

Not much of a "catastrophic meltdown" without any casualties, is it? Despite all of NYTimes's spooky photos/clickbait.

For a more balanced perspective, here's a photo of Fukushima City, a bustling metropolis of 238,000, and capital of the prefecture:

It was taken not in 1998, or 2010, but in May, 2011 - three months after the scary, dark, radioactive, frightening, cataclysmic, scary, catatstrophic disaster at Fukushima-Daiichi (did I mention it was scary?).

"It is so difficult to maintain an appropriate level of anxiety regarding the risks of nuclear energy and the possible results of it going wrong."

A good sign. As you learn more about nuclear energy you'll be less and less afraid of it.
 

 

Rakesh  Sharma's picture
Rakesh Sharma on Mar 18, 2021

Interesting post, Jim. From what I've read recently, while the Fukushima Daiichi disaster has slashed nuclear's share of Japan's electricity mix, the country hasn't entirely given up on nuclear.

The Ministry of Economy released a report last year that detailed a pathway to decarbonizing the economy by "Maximizing utilization of existing nuclear infrastructure, while aiming to decrease dependency on nuclear power." Japan still has nine operational nuclear plants and is considering them as a source for baseload power. Here's an interesting article about the problems with phasing out nuclear power in Japan: 

https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2021/03/07/legacy-of-the-fukushima-nuclear-disaster/   

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »