The Generation Professionals Group is for utility professionals who work in biomass, coal, gas/oil, hydro, natural gas, or nuclear power generation fields. 

Charley Rattan's picture
World Hydrogen Leader Charley Rattan Associates

UK based offshore wind & hydrogen corporate advisor and trainer; Faculty member World Hydrogen Leaders. Delivering global hydrogen and offshore wind corporate investment advice, business...

  • Member since 2019
  • 3,461 items added with 2,311,102 views
  • May 11, 2020


To date the East and West coast have garnered most attention.  Here perhaps is another option for US Offshore Wind 


Dr Massey and I discuss an exciting time for offshore wind


Charley Rattan's picture
Thank Charley for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member
Spell checking: Press the CTRL or COMMAND key then click on the underlined misspelled word.
Matt Chester's picture
Matt Chester on May 11, 2020

NREL lists the Gulf’s shallow water, lower average wave heights, and existing oil and gas infrastructure on the positive side for developing all sorts of ocean energy, including tides and currents, thermal conversion, wave power, and hydrogen conversion in addition to wind turbines.

Existing oil and gas infrastructure as a positive-- now that would be a double whammy of good news of such infrastructure were repurposed to clean energy

Charley Rattan's picture
Charley Rattan on May 12, 2020

Yes using circular principles to extend asset life is surely a good idea. It is happening in Europe too.

Mark Silverstone's picture
Mark Silverstone on May 12, 2020

I regret clicking on the usual suspects link in your post.  It kind of ruined dinner.  One thing about Texas: It doesn´t like to come in second. So, I share your wonder at why offshore wind has not yet been taken up on the Gulf Coast, at least offshore Texas. I assume it is on its way.

Equinor, the Norwegian oil company, has lost over USD 2 billion in the last year in the US, and the folks back home are not pleased.  But, they´ve invested more than that in offshore wind in the North Sea and the US east coast. I have to believe they are looking at this, though from where the investment money will come at the moment is not at all clear. 

Major O&G companies could save more money than it would cost to put wind turbines on obsolete offshore structures, by avoiding the costs of removing the structures. Instead, the US is allowing them to simply dump them on the sea floor in the "rigs to reef" scam.

Bob Meinetz's picture
Bob Meinetz on May 14, 2020

Mark, given Equinor's revenue from offshore oil wells is $68B/yr, an investment of $2B amounts to good PR for the company.
To put Equinor's investment into perspective: in 2020 alone, Norwegian oil companies will invest $21B to suck more oil and gas from below the North Sea.

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »