In partnership with PLMA, this group is for practitioners from energy utilities, solution providers, and trade allies to share load management expertise and explore innovative approaches to program delivery, pricing constructs, and technology adoption.

Video

Demand Flexibility Exchange

Rafael Herzberg's picture
Consultant energy affairs Self employed

Rafael Herzberg- is an independent energy consultant, self-employed (since 2018) based in São Paulo, Brazil* Focus on C level, VPs and upper managers associated to energy related info, analysis...

  • Member since 2003
  • 2,212 items added with 1,290,896 views
  • Aug 2, 2022
  • 403 views

Access Video

DF Exchange is a tool that complements the ongoing DF concept. 

The difference is about the integration time. While the traditional DF is associated with "calls" for the short term, the DF exchange is centered on contractual demands.

The concept is very simple. DF exchange is a tool to help energy users who pay for contracted demand to better adjust their contracted demands.

This has become important because these energy suers are facing a number of changes: 1) Their intensity of activities, 2) their energy conversion processes are changing, 3) what they are doing in each location is changing , 4) energy sources they are using may be changing with distributed generation and the list goes on and on!

But... the contractual arrangement for demand is a very stiff one and it makes sense since the electric power sector is a capital intensive one! Whether a fixed contract or a ratchet.

This concept DF exchange enables energy users better adjust their needs BUT making sure the local utility company also gains.

Watch this 4 minute video to get acquainted with this new proposition!

 

 

Discussions
Julian Silk's picture
Julian Silk on Aug 2, 2022

Rafael, I listened to this.  Isn't your industrial-commercial deal, where they were right next to each other, unusual?  It would seem to the uninitiated that most of these sort of exchanges would take place not in the same service area, but across boundaries, so transmission would be highly involved.  If this is wrong, you might explain it, so as to address a concern investors may have.

Rafael Herzberg's picture
Rafael Herzberg on Aug 2, 2022

Julian, it might be conceived both ways (in the same service territory or not). The main aspect is always the same: increasing the load factor of the whole power supply chain. And, as we all know, the higher the overall load factor, the lower the Capital Expenditure cost related to kWh sales.

Rafael Herzberg's picture
Thank Rafael for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »