Clean Power Professionals Group
This special interest group is for professionals to connect and discuss all types of carbon-free power alternatives, including nuclear, renewable, tidal and more.
Post
What’s the Environmental Footprint of Renewable Energy Installation?
The eco-conscious movement has paved the way for new residential and commercial sustainability standards. Consumers are more likely to purchase a low-emission product than its environmentally degrading counterpart. The increased demand for green goods promotes companies’ adoption of renewable energy sources.
Unfortunately, businesses transition toward clean energy sourcing without evaluating the environmental effects. All technological devices have an ecological impact, causing an expansion of individual carbon and water footprints. Assessing the adverse effects of renewable energy system installations can generate sustainable solutions.
Your access to Member Features is limited.
Solar
A significant portion of solar panel harm derives from installations. Few areas are suitable for optimal placement based on land availability and sun exposure, so professionals clear-cut natural spaces to make room.
Clear-cutting generates habitat degradation, leaving species without adequate protection or food sources. A decrease in biodiversity harms the local ecosystem’s functionality and allows for the expansion of invasive species.
The destruction of vegetation in solar farm installation is counterproductive to the system’s goal. Trees are the environment’s natural carbon filters. One mature tree eliminates 48 pounds of greenhouse gas emissions annually, so decreasing the number of trees increases the amount of discharge.
The composition of panels also escalates ecological degradation during farm development since they contain acetone, hydrochloric acid, hydrogen fluoride and nitric acid. If a professional breaks a panel during the installation process, it releases toxic waste into the environment. Local pollution can increase atmospheric and water degradation and raise the ecological footprint of a system.
Some companies overinstall panels without adequate education and prior efficiency calculations. When they place many systems in one region, they may significantly impact the local ecosystem. Examining the optimal panel size can increase the efficiency and reliability of a solar farm’s energy production.
Wind
Onshore wind turbine installations also generate adverse ecological effects. The process includes material mining and production pollution, which comprise 80% of turbine emissions. Installation additionally drives transportation-related contamination.
Few companies manufacture turbines, increasing the transport rate of the devices. In America, the transportation sector produces 29% of all greenhouse gas emissions. It is the single largest contributing factor to pollution production nationally.
The installation process also endangers bat species. Bats view turbines as trees or water sources, causing mass collisions. As more species die, the sustainability of wind power production decreases.
Environmental engineers and scientists search for technological advancements to decrease the adverse effects of turbines. Maintaining clean energy sourcing is essential to reducing our greenhouse gas emissions. It additionally transitions society’s energy reliance away from fossil fuels, significantly reducing atmospheric pollution.
Offshore wind production also creates environmental challenges. During installation, professionals drill the base or three stabilizing legs into the seabed. Turbines invade marine species’ habitats, embedding harmful materials into the ocean floor.
Hammering into the seabed destroys wildlife and increases localized debris. With limited visibility, aquatic species have trouble protecting themselves from predators. Degrading habitats also cause marine life to relocate, leaving them without food or shelter.
Damage to a turbine’s blades during installation drives a significant pollution problem. Unlike other renewable energy materials, they are nonrecyclable. When someone damages one during installation, they go through an energy-intensive and pollution-generating process. Professionals cut up the blades into small pieces and take them to a designated turbine landfill. Workers place the materials into shallow graves where they will remain indefinitely.
Over time, the elements may leach into the soil, polluting nearby lands. Without system advancements, we may run out of landfill space and have limited disposal resources. Fortunately, professionals are seeking sustainable solutions, decreasing atmospheric and surface-level pollution.
How You Can Lower Emissions
When shrinking your carbon footprint, it is essential to evaluate the difference between natural processes and technological aid. We can organically reduce emissions by expanding vegetation and preserving wild spaces. Limiting our electricity use also decreases pollution, even when utilizing renewable sources.
Clean energy may support the modern lifestyle, keeping humanity safe and healthy, but it may also drive ecological degradation. We can combine low-emission energy sources with eco-conscious living, effectively shrinking the national footprint.
Discussions
The Russians and Chinese are building large numbers of nuclear reactors. Not exactly a cottage industry.
A couple of reactors a year each - not exactly large numbers.
All that matters is growth in generation - nuclear WW is still below its peak from 2006. Pathetic.
.jpg){kind=spacer}
Get Published - Build a Following
The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.
If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.
Sign in to Participate