In partnership with AESP: The increasing roles of DERs, connected technology and Big Data are driving rapid change in energy efficiency. As we shape the Utility of the future, this community will help you keep up with the latest developments. 

WARNING: SIGN-IN

You need to be a member of Energy Central to access some features and content. Please or register to continue.

Post

UPDATE: Docket 19-3658 - DOE EISA Lawsuit

image credit: energy central

Get ready to wait a little longer.

Yesterday, the court granted the use of a deferred appendix in the case against the DOE regarding the withdrawal of standard lamp definition changes. The due date for briefs is 3/16, but the appellant has 21 days after filing the initial briefs to file the appendix (all documentation needed for the court to make a decision) and then another 14 days after that to resubmit their briefs with proper citations of the appendix material.

This likely means we won't have the full story in this case until 4/20 and the potential extra month in delay will further delay a decision - the court won't review the initial brief until the appendix is filed and the briefs re-filed with correct citations.

Do you like this waiting game yet?

Discussions

Spell checking: Press the CTRL or COMMAND key then click on the underlined misspelled word.
Matt Chester's picture
Matt Chester on Mar 6, 2020

What exactly is a deferred appendix, and why was it sought by those fighting these changes? What's the strategy-- to have more time to gather information, or is there any sort of 'gamesmanship' in play here?

Matt Bowgren's picture
Matt Bowgren on Mar 9, 2020

Not really gamesmanship - just gives them more time. From my understanding (I'm nowhere near a lawyer and am still learning about the full regulatory process) it's generally used when there is a lot of potential material to reference and this way they are able to have more time to go through everything and properly reference it in their brief. It also gives them more time to respond to everything the appellee (i.e. DOE) wants to include in the appendix and their brief. Ultimately, both parties have to agree to the appendix, so it's not like they're avoiding a surprise juror or something like you might see on TV.

Matt Bowgren's picture

Thank Matt for the Post!

Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »