In partnership with AESP: The increasing roles of DERs, connected technology and Big Data are driving rapid change in energy efficiency. As we shape the Utility of the future, this community will help you keep up with the latest developments. 

Post

Renewables and energy storage - the way forward for ERCOT?

image credit: iStock
Wayne Muncaster's picture
VP North America, GridBeyond

Wayne is a global expert on evolving energy markets and the energy transition, and the effects this has on market participants and energy consumers. Starting out over 20 years ago in the most...

  • Member since 2021
  • 2 items added with 1,381 views
  • Jul 6, 2021
  • 874 views

The installation of new renewable generation across the country is not slowing down. Texas is not an exception here, despite the uncertainty of the scope and direction of the reforms planned by the Texas Senate and ERCOT in response to the weather driven difficulties of balancing the grid network.

The recent data[1] on the solar market shows that 5GWdc of solar capacity was installed in the US in Q1 2021 a record 46% increase over the first quarter of 2020, with Texas installing nearly three-times as much solar as any other US state during the first three months of this year. The Lone Star State is also home to the highest level of installed wind power capacity in the US, having grown from 9.4GW in 2011 to 27.9GW at the end of 2020[2].

All of this has been combined with a significant increase in the deployment of new energy storage projects. ERCOT has recently confirmed it has approximately 250MW[3] of operational energy storage at its disposal, and this is expected to rise to 1GW this summer. Furthermore, there is also 2.7GW still waiting to be connected to the network.

There is a significant number of opportunities and projects in the pipeline in Texas and this represents a very strong energy storage queue that ERCOT will need to decide how best to manage going forward. GridBeyond’s experience in managing batteries and hybridizing them with load assets in the UK and Ireland; two of the most advanced and digitalized energy markets, tells us that energy storage on the network, whether it is on a utility/transmission level or behind-the-meter, can deliver significant benefits to all market participants.

As the proportion of renewable electricity increases in the energy mix, so does the need for battery storage, to manage the intermittency of renewable generation. In addition to providing arbitrage and dispatching additional capacity, batteries play a crucial part in balancing the frequency of the grid and maintaining its integrity on a second and sub-second basis through participation in ancillary services. Renewable generation and energy storage go hand-in-hand, whether they are co-located or not, and Texas is no different in this regard to any other market, especially considering the high volumes of wind and solar generation that are coming onto the grid in the ERCOT.

Battery storage should be seen as a part of a solution that improves system flexibility and provides greater resilience against extreme weather conditions. It supports grid operators with maintaining network balance, and empowers energy consumers to be more efficient, while helping them to manage price volatility, as we have seen in the market for a while now, and protect their bottom lines.

Greater deployment of battery storage should be considered alongside other measures already announced by the ERCOT, such as winterization of the generation assets. The energy network is a very complex mechanism with numerous moving parts and there is no single type of asset or element that can independently propel the Grid through its transition. It is more about looking at the system as a whole - a combination of various generation assets, both on industrial and community levels, powered by gas and renewables, and energy storage units, including not only large scale industrial batteries but also those that sit behind-the-meter, and those that are used to develop charging infrastructure for the growing number of EVs.

Greater diversification and decentralisation of assets are parts of the solution to improve grid reliability, both on the network level and for individual energy consumer, especially those who operate in critical power sectors. In this context, batteries are often seen as ‘ultimate diversifiers’ as they can be deployed to improve resilience at any level, whether it be on a customer or generation site, or at the distribution or transmission levels.

At the moment, the opportunity for energy storage in Texas is dominated by large, utility scale deployments. To improve the integration of batteries into the network, the market needs to find a way to integrate smaller, distributed energy storage assets effectively into both the energy and ancillary services markets.

 


[1] US Solar Market Insight by the Solar Energy Industries Association and Wood Mackenzie, https://www.woodmac.com/research/products/power-and-renewables/

 

[2] Global Energy after the U.S. Energy Information Administration, https://www.energyglobal.com/wind/24062021/eia-most-new-us-wind-capacity-built-in-central-regions/

 

[3] https://www.energy-storage.news/news/recognising-market-value-of-energy-storage-is-key-priority-for-some-us-grid

 

 

Discussions
Matt Chester's picture
Matt Chester on Jul 6, 2021

Greater diversification and decentralisation of assets are parts of the solution to improve grid reliability, both on the network level and for individual energy consumer, especially those who operate in critical power sectors

What would you say to the concern some have that more assets and more diversity in the location and type of those assets might also increase reliability concerns-- more points of failure, more potential weaknesses for bad actors to exploit (physically and via cyber attacks)? Is the redundancy provided enough to offset any of those types of risks? 

Wayne Muncaster's picture
Wayne Muncaster on Jul 6, 2021

Great question Matt.  My view is that decentralization doesn't make reliability more of a concern; the issues around points of failure (eg, February in Texas) and cyber attacks (eg, Colonial Pipeline and numerous others) are here today and fewer and larger assets don't mitigate them.  I actually believe that distributed assets actually help lessen the overall impact simply through having less homes and businesses reliant on each asset.

What decentralization does bring, however, is complexity in managing and balancing networks - supply and demand, voltage, inertia, frequency, etc.  That complexity requires different technology and automation to enable the grid operators to do their job, but ultimately, the security of any system is only as good as the security of the network operators themselves, regardless of the size and number of assets.

Matt Chester's picture
Matt Chester on Jul 6, 2021

Thanks for the follow up, Wayne-- and great points. 

That complexity requires different technology and automation to enable the grid operators to do their job, but ultimately, the security of any system is only as good as the security of the network operators themselves, regardless of the size and number of assets.

No doubt-- this distributed grid we're moving towards simply wouldn't be possible without the automated type technology we now have monitoring the grid, and moving towards AI in that regard helps to eliminate human error in an important way (though of course we're not yet approaching AI completely replacing humans-- we still need that SME mind behind the scenes operating as a crucial check on the tech!)

Jim Stack's picture
Jim Stack on Jul 7, 2021

Great article Wayne, Storage on the GRID and at homes and business is the best thing to happen to the GRID in 100 years. Electric vehicles can also help the GRID with V2G. All of this can work together with the right policies.  Charging Off Peak can make the GRID more efficient. Storage at Fast Charging stations should be mandatory. 

   The price of advanced batteries is drop and their life is increasing. Micro GRID are forming all over the world. Managed with with good policies and we all win. 

Michael Keller's picture
Michael Keller on Jul 14, 2021

Unit costs historically fall with larger and more efficient production facilities. Therein lies a problem with decentralization; higher electricity prices. Unclear how decentralization lowers costs. Additionally, the smaller generating assets need to properly protect the grid - generally means protective relays and some form of coordination. That creates more complexity and higher costs.

Wayne Muncaster's picture
Thank Wayne for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network® is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »