In partnership with AESP: The increasing roles of DERs, connected technology and Big Data are driving rapid change in energy efficiency. As we shape the Utility of the future, this community will help you keep up with the latest developments. 

WARNING: SIGN-IN

You need to be a member of Energy Central to access some features and content. Please or register to continue.

Post

Energy Efficiency: Still The Low Hanging Fruit

In the battle against climate change, the world is actively seeking anticyclones. If the ongoing shift from fossil to renewable energy is one of those, another, less energetically publicized but with more attractive financial paybacks, is energy efficiency.” That is the opening line in a recently released report by Sebastien Gruter and James Moore of Redburn, a London-based market research firm titled Emissions Anticyclone. It explains, among other things, why energy efficiency gains must almost double to reach the Paris Agreement’s targets and why energy efficiency is the largest and cheapest untapped source of emissions reductions.

The report’s main point is that the carbon reduction impact of the transition from fossil fuels to renewable resources will be greatly amplified if energy is more efficiently utilized – who can argue with that? It says,

“If the relationship between GDP and energy consumption holds steady over the next 20 years, we will consume 25% more energy in 2040 … (putting) … us a long way above climate goals ...”

“Complying with the Paris Agreement whilst continuing to increase our wealth would require a material shift in energy mix and a marked step down in energy intensity.”

Redburn’s comprehensive report examines some 2,500 listed companies from all sectors specifically looking at their energy intensity – that is energy used per unit of output. Not surprisingly, it finds that energy-intensive industries such as fossil power generation, marine, steel, airlines, building material – think cement manufacturing – to name the obvious ones, will be under “enormous pressure to lower their energy use and CO2 emissions” (Above visual).

Assuming a price of €50 ($57) per tonne of CO2, not an unreasonable number, would be a devastating blow to some industries – it would represent 16% of sales for fossil fuel generators, 6% for airlines, but only 2% for major oil and gas companies. It explains why coal mining companies and coal-fired generators are essentially doomed.

 

It also explains why LED lighting manufacturers or those in the business of making efficient Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC), air compressors, building automation, insulation material, high efficiency pumps and motors are likely to prosper as emitting carbon becomes expensive. It explains why older, less efficient planes will remain grounded as the airline industry resumes flying after the pandemic.

The rewards in energy efficiency investment, according to Redburn, are hard to pass. Many, including high efficiency motors, drives, compressors, building energy management systems, efficient lighting and HVAC systems have paybacks within 2-3 years under reasonable assumptions (visual above).

Redburn, whose unbiased original research is used by investment fund managers, examined 3 categories in its report:

  • The substitute category refers to a technology that replaces a less energy-efficient technology, for example an LED versus incandescent lamps;
  • The energy-centric’ category refers to a product where energy accounts for a large share of the total cost of ownership whilst representing a meaningful share of the energy consumption in the customer’ process, for example an air compressor; and
  • The optimizer category refers to a product that helps to optimize energy use, for example, a low-voltage electric drive or motor.

This being a capital goods report, Redburn examines the major stakeholders such as Siemens, Alstom, ABB, Electrolux and upgrades Epiroc and Schneider to “Buy” because they are deemed to be well-positioned to take advantage of the push towards energy efficiency services.

Redburn points out that “There are two ways to reduce greenhouse gas emissions while maintaining economic growth: we can produce ‘cleaner’ energy that generates fewer emissions – renewable energy, for example; or we can produce more goods or services with less energy” – focusing on the latter.

The report has a number of nuggets that are sometimes lost in such comprehensive studies. For example, it points out that a warmer climate will result in higher energy consumption, all else being equal.

 

“Based on UN projections, we calculate that more than 85% of the global population increase in the next 20 years will come from countries where the average temperature is above 20°C.

Not surprisingly, energy-intensive countries in hot climates such as those in the Middle East and hot and humid ones such as those in South East Asia will require even more electricity to remain functional (Table). Meteorologists are warning that hot parts of the globe will become more-or-less unbearable, requiring even more air conditioning and water – both highly electricity intensive.

Climate change is no longer an abstract concept. Arid parts of the world – for example the Southwest of the US and Australia’s interior – will get drier and warmer. Working outdoor during the mid-day summer hours in parts of the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, already unbearable, will become fatal.

In the grand scheme of things, of course, large listed companies as well as banks and fund managers who invest in them, are increasingly being pressured to report their contribution to climate change, their exposure and what they are doing to address these issues (visual).

 

The report examines the energy efficiency’s low hanging fruits – efficient lighting, motors, pumps, HVAC, etc. – the usual suspects. Redburn focuses on 2 applications with tremendous potential: lighting and electric motors because

  • They use lots of electricity; and
  • Their energy savings potential is extremely high and easy to capture.

Redburn reports that lighting consumed 20% of world’s electricity as recently as 10 years ago, but this has dropped to 13% today, due to the improved efficiency of lighting fixtures. The US Dept. of Energy (DOE) projects more energy savings in the next 15 years as LED penetrates 85% of the installed base by 2035, with 66% of the savings expected in the commercial sector and from street lighting.

According to the International Energy Agency (IEA) an astonishing 45% of global electricity consumption may be attributed to electric motors (visual), about two-thirds of it in the industrial sector. Even more astonishing is that this percentage is likely to grow as the electrification of the global economy gains momentum.

Making electric motors, lighting ad HVAC more efficient has never been more critical or profitable.

Discussions

Bob Meinetz's picture
Bob Meinetz on Jul 3, 2020

"Making electric motors, lighting ad HVAC more efficient has never been more critical or profitable."

Fereidoon, doesn't the efficiency industry itself - the production of all those new, efficient motors made from rare-earth magnets, and home insulation; the transportation of all those trucks, back and forth to job sites, have a carbon impact?

I think the first step should be determining whether this new, high-growth industry is not making a bad problem worse.

Matt Chester's picture
Matt Chester on Jul 6, 2020

Looking at a full lifecycle carbon, energy, & cost analysis should of course be paramount to widescale energy efficiency measures, and that's why in fact they are. Take, for example, lighting efficiency measures in recent decades that have brought about greater amounts of LEDs, phased out old technologies like mercury vapor lamps, and generally pushed along the industry to implement more efficient technologies. Those rulemaking processes look in painstaking detail at the total economic costs to customer and manufacturers, the sustainability impact-- emissions and materials and energy and more, the technological feasibility, everything. Looking at just the final rule of the MHLF rulemaking from a decade ago (which I look at specifically because in a past life I played some tiny part in these analyses) shows the amount to which these questions are integrated into the process

Fereidoon P. Sioshansi, Ph.D.'s picture

Thank Fereidoon P. for the Post!

Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »