This group brings together the best thinkers on energy and climate. Join us for smart, insightful posts and conversations about where the energy industry is and where it is going.


Your life under the Green New Deal

Paul Driessen's picture
Senior Policy Analyst Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT) Congress of Racial Equality (CORE) and Heartland Institute

PAUL DRIESSEN is senior policy analyst for the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT) Congress of Racial Equality (CORE) and Heartland Institute, public policy institutes that promote...

  • Member since 2001
  • 37 items added with 73,969 views
  • Oct 14, 2020

During the cantankerous September 29 presidential “debate,” candidate Joe Biden proclaimed “I am the Democratic Party.” He is in charge, he insisted, and his views will be Democrat policy. Others aren’t so sure – about that, about what his views actually are, or about how far to the left he would be pushed, prodded and pressured by Kamala Harris, AOC, Bernie Sanders, Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, Antifa mobs, and coastal and blue city governing, academic and technology elites.

Mr. Biden has pledged to eliminate the Trump tax cuts, but has refused to say whether he supports single-payer nationalized healthcare, Second Amendment self-defense, packing the Supreme Court, eliminating the Senate filibuster, or adding Puerto Rico, Guam and Washington DC as new (Democrat) states.

Like Nancy Pelosi on ObamaCare, he wants us to vote for him, so we can find out what his positions are.

When he’s in California or Manhattan, he says he’ll ban fracking – which he claims to support when he’s in Ohio and Pennsylvania, where he needs rural and blue-collar voters who support and benefit greatly from this amazing technology. However, Mr. Biden does say he will put controlling Earth’s climate at the center of US foreign policy. So he strongly supports the Green New Deal (GND), which would completely replace fossil fuels with “clean, green” electricity and biofuel energy by 2035.

GND proponents want us to believe this can be done quickly, easily, affordably, ecologically, sustainably and painlessly – almost with the wave of a magic wand. Not a chance. Those in power would undoubtedly protect their privileged status. But the GND would control and pummel the jobs, lives, living standards, savings, personal choices and ecological heritage of rural, poor, minority, elderly and working classes.

Dependable coal and natural gas power plants will be replaced by intermittent, weather-dependent wind and solar power; gasoline-powered vehicles with electric models. That’s obvious.

But our nation’s abundant coal, oil, natural gas and petroleum liquids provide over 80% of the energy that makes America’s jobs, lives and living standards possible. Locking them in the ground would have far-reaching impacts that are far less apparent, and have (deliberately?) received little media attention.

In 2018, America’s fossil fuels generated about 2.7 billion megawatt-hours (MWh) of electricity. But almost two-thirds of the nation’s non-exported natural gas served industrial, commercial and residential needs – including factories, hospital emergency power systems, and furnaces, ovens, stoves and hot water heaters in restaurants and tens of millions of US homes. That’s equivalent to another 2.7 billion MWh.

The nation’s 65 million cars, light trucks, buses, semi-trailers, motor homes, tractors, backhoes and other vehicles consumed the gasoline and diesel equivalent of yet another 2 billion MWh.

Altogether, that’s nearly 7.5 billion MWh that the Green New Deal would have to replace by 2035!

Even assuming the United States and world could mine, process and transport enough metals and minerals – and manufacture and transport all the components and finished equipment to make this happen – this brave new all-electric nation would require millions of onshore wind turbines, tens of thousands of offshore turbines, billions of solar panels, billions of vehicle batteries, billions of backup energy storage batteries, thousands of miles of new high voltage transmission lines, and billions of tons of concrete!

The GND would turn our Midlands – what elites denigrate as flyover country – into vast energy colonies. Millions of acres of farmland, wildlife habitat and scenic areas would be blanketed by industrial wind, solar and battery facilities, and power lines to electricity-hungry towns and cities. Windswept ocean vistas and sea lanes would be plagued by towering turbines. Birds, bats and other wildlife would disappear.

With mining still under assault in the USA, the metals, minerals, components and equipment would come mostly from China or Chinese companies in Africa, using vast quantities of fossil fuels, under minimal to nonexistent environmental, workplace safety, fair wage and child labor laws. This smells of slavery and racism – making us complicit in perpetuating it, and making it increasingly difficult for the United States to criticize or challenge China on human rights, pollution, military aggression or territorial expansion.

The GND would also mean ripping out, and throwing out, the natural gas appliances you now have, replacing them with electric models, and installing rapid charging systems for your cars. That will mean upgrading household, neighborhood and national electrical systems, to handle the extra loads.

Oil and natural gas are also feed stocks for pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, paints, synthetic fibers, fertilizers ... and plastics for computers, wind turbine blades, solar panel films and countless other products. Under the GND, we’d have to shut down those US-based industries, import feed stocks for them, or turn hundreds of millions of acres into biofuel plantations.

Up to 10 million high-pay petroleum, petrochemical and manufacturing jobs would be lost – with many replaced by low-pay, temporary or short-term jobs hauling, installing, maintaining, dismantling and landfilling wind turbines, solar panels and batteries. The GND would cost tens of trillions of dollars!

GND ringleader California wants the entire country to emulate its policies. Its families and businesses already pay the highest electricity prices in the continental USA – and are getting hammered repeatedly by blackouts. Now the state has mandated electric cars, cooking and heating. No more natural gas. How its legislators expect to generate all that extra electricity and avoid more blackouts, no one knows.

Families, factories, hospitals, schools and businesses used to paying 7, 9 or 11 cents per kilowatt-hour for 24/7/365 electricity better brace themselves for rude shocks. Under the GND, you’ll be paying 14, 18, 22 cents per kWh, as they do in green US states – or even 35 US cents per kWh, as they do in Germany. You’ll also be using twice as much electricity, and probably experiencing repeated power interruptions.

Get used to having electricity when it’s available, rather than when you need it, however “essential” your business services or family needs might be. How you will survive, whether your job will disappear, whether you will join the ranks of those who must choose between heating and eating, is anyone’s guess.

A week of cloudy weather will really reduce solar output – and wind turbines generate roughly zero electricity on the hottest and most frigid days. Be careful where you live or need to recharge your EV.

As to all those electric vehicles, a basic $39,000 Model 3 Tesla sedan has a battery module that weighs some 1,200 pounds and gets around 250 miles on a charge. Just don’t use the heater or AC, don’t take long family trips, and don’t get caught in a blizzard, or a traffic jam trying to escape a roaring forest fire.

How many tons of batteries a bus, semi-truck or mining excavator would require, where you’d put them, and how many hours a day you’d waste recharging them, are other important considerations. Perhaps Mr. Biden or Ms. Ocasio-Cortez has the answers.   

The Obama Administration sent a heavily armed SWAT team into Gibson Guitar offices over a phony Endangered Species Act violation. Democrats refuse to condemn BLM and Antifa mob violence, arson and looting. How a Biden-Harris-AOC Deep State and its allies might respond to organized or even spontaneous resistance to Green New Deal dictates and impacts is pretty easy to imagine. So is their response to cities, counties and states declaring themselves “sanctuaries” to GND or gun control decrees.

Keep in mind, too: This entire GND energy, economic and living standards “transformation” is being justified by claims that we face a “climate emergency” and “ongoing ravages of climate change.”

It’s all a gigantic Climate Hustle. There is no climate emergency. Humans cannot control Earth’s climate and weather. Fossil fuel emissions have negligible effects. Carbon dioxide is not a pollutant; it is the miracle molecule that makes plant, human and animal life possible. Climate change and extreme weather have been “real” throughout history. What we are seeing today is in no way unprecedented.

Green New Dealers would bring us, our country and our planet enormous pain for no gain – except that they would get more money, power and control.

Paul Driessen is senior policy analyst for the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow ( and author of books and articles on energy, environment, climate and human rights issues.

Bob Meinetz's picture
Bob Meinetz on Oct 14, 2020

Paul, maybe you were watching a different debate than I was. Though I heard Biden get a few words in edgewise, the only sentence I heard was a question: "Would you shut up, man?"

Now doubt the Biden presidency will be hard on the hard-core, anti-thought think tank known as the Heartland Institute. One might almost believe from its romantic name it was dedicated to preserving America's heartland, and not exploiting it for every dime its supporters possibly can.

Nov. 3, Judgement Day, is just around the corner. I can't wait.

Rick Engebretson's picture
Rick Engebretson on Oct 15, 2020

Bob, a smart guy like you might help us figure out  how food prices will not rise dramatically under a hypothetical Biden administration. If you can shift your thoughts from nuclear reactors to the energy inputs of agriculture, from planting to processing to shipping to cooking, please help us understand how we in the heartland can adapt to the thinking of the heartless-land elite. Will you self-admiring leaders simply walk around ever more starving people living and dying in the street?? We truly don't understand such people.

We both agree human activity has imperiled a sustainable Earth. But, over at least a decade, I don't think I have ever seen anybody on TEC seriously consider the "need to feed."

Bob Meinetz's picture
Bob Meinetz on Oct 16, 2020

Honestly that's the first time I've heard that food prices would rise under a Biden presidency, Rick. I know most farmers in the heartland have had enough of Trump's self-aggrandizing blather and ineptitude.

Rural Communities Have Been Devastated by Failed Policies and Want Solutions

"Will you self-admiring leaders simply walk around ever more starving people living and dying in the street?"

Don't know, but if Trump's elected we'll find out.

Rick Engebretson's picture
Rick Engebretson on Oct 16, 2020

Bob, you must be making your rural info up or have some seriously mistaken news, or both.  "Help wanted" signs absolutely everywhere. Today I passed a discount gas station that offered, I think, $1.92/gal. gas. We have cheaper "winter blend" gasoline up here when it's cold, and it is cold today with snow.

Anyway, if you question the fuel cost inputs for reliably putting food on the table for 7+ billion people you shouldn't be designing nuclear reactor electric generators. Tax fuel, you tax eating. Biden's crowd needs to be more innovative than that.

Jaak Saame's picture
Jaak Saame on Jan 3, 2021


Joe Deely's picture
Joe Deely on Oct 15, 2020

The fly that landed and stayed on Pence's head for two minutes would love this article.  

Bob Meinetz's picture
Bob Meinetz on Oct 16, 2020


Rick Engebretson's picture
Rick Engebretson on Oct 15, 2020

I'll try another comment without getting deleted. As a Biophysicist, once a good scientist, and living about as "Green" as anybody for over 40 years, I strongly support some form of a Green New Deal. Just not the willfully ignorant anti-science now being paraded by money hungry politicians.

I have always seen opportunity for innovation. First, a fiber-optic super-network. Then automation of bio-medical testing. Then recycling plastic to manage livestock farm wastes. Currently solar photochemical conversion of biomass to fuel and biochar, with fiber-glass roofing for solar harvesting. Also DC microgrids in case the big grid needs help.

Most of today's fake greenies would freeze and starve if forced to work as necessary to live green. And if any of their very old technologies actually worked we would know it by now. What scares me is their intent to clobber innovation; I have seen and experienced too much anti-science. Freedom to learn and try ideas, science itself, is threatened. I was once proud to be the only person I knew to get A's in advanced Biochemistry, Genetics, Solid State Physics, etc., in a program at the University of Minnesota run by the inventor of digital electronics. Then I learned politics is run by multitudes of savage instincts, and realized I wasn't very smart at all.

Matt Chester's picture
Matt Chester on Oct 15, 2020

There's plenty to refute and question in the above, but I'll focus on the baseline of pointing out the Biden campaign positions.

When he’s in California or Manhattan, he says he’ll ban fracking – which he claims to support when he’s in Ohio and Pennsylvania, where he needs rural and blue-collar voters who support and benefit greatly from this amazing technology. However, Mr. Biden does say he will put controlling Earth’s climate at the center of US foreign policy. So he strongly supports the Green New Deal (GND), which would completely replace fossil fuels with “clean, green” electricity and biofuel energy by 2035.

  1. Biden is campaigning on energy plans that do not include the banning of fracking 
  2. Biden's energy plan acknowledges the Green New Deal as a crucial framework, but his proposal is not adopting the Green New Deal but rather taking certain elements of it (and not others) to create his platform
Paul Driessen's picture
Thank Paul for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »