This group brings together the best thinkers on energy and climate. Join us for smart, insightful posts and conversations about where the energy industry is and where it is going.

Post

Why do Nordic countries top Global cleantech innovation rankings?

Christopher Williams's picture
  • Member since 2018
  • 44 items added with 19,347 views
  • Sep 17, 2012
  • 777 views

What are the underlying factors and can others learn from the Vikings of the North?

The Nordic countries seem to consistently rank highly in global innovation rankings, topping the list Cleantech Innovation Index[i]. Although the report covers a wide range of indicators to arrive at this conclusion and indeed provides some explanatory rationale as to why the Nordics excel at cleantech innovation, it barely touches the surface. We’ve read several articles that try to dig a bit deeper, without enlightening completely. Amy Brown identifies 5 ‘explanations’ to why the Nordic countries are global leaders of cleantech in an article[ii] with the same title. High levels of general innovation, roots in creating major industries within engineering and technology, the desire to apply technological insight to environmental challenges, strong government backing and a high level of public environmental awareness are Brown’s justification of the strong position of the Nordics in the ranking. We do not disagree with these hypotheses, but they leave us with more questions than answers. We want to get to the heart of the matter: what are the underlying factors of Nordic cleantech innovation success? We set out to analyse the social, cultural and behavioural aspects of the Nordic countries that we believe contribute positively to inputs to general and cleantech specific innovation. This is what we found:

Exhibit A: An Autonomous and Responsible Society

We see a high degree of autonomy in the Nordic countries compared to most other countries. Self-government is a fundamental principle to the region and it permeates everything – from child upbringing, through the educational system, all the way into professional life. From an early age it is not unusual that teachers in school encourage their students to choose parts of the curriculum and suggest new methods of evaluating their own performance. There has even been incidents were pupils were allowed to give themselves grades for high school exams (GSCEs/SATs equivalent), where the sole requirement is that the pupil should grade themselves fairly and justly. So, young Scandinavians are taught at a very early age to be independent and to take responsibility for their own life. And when these kids eventually grow up and a source of income is to be generated, many chose to continue this path by starting their own company instead of working in an established company where people tell you what to do, a less autonomous reality.

The Nordic population seem to act more responsibly than their European counterparts (Sorry, but it is true). Scandinavians are so well-behaved it is like they have all been manufactured at a plant and that understanding that your actions affects the rest of the ‘anthill’ is the factory-setting. Most Scandies we talk to all believe ‘clean up your own mess’ is an important political principle to live by. Voilà, no state-run ‘naughty step’ is needed. This factory-setting is why littering has never been a big issue in the Nordic cities. Whereas most other capitals in Europe spend fortunes on anti-littering campaigns, they are rarely needed in the North.

 

 

Exhibit B: Wrath of Nature

In addition to the inbred principle of social responsibility, the relationship to nature can help elucidate why the Nordics feel passionate about sustainability and why they consequently succeed in cleantech innovation.

The four Nordic countries (leaving Denmark out of it) are all extremely sparsely inhabited, and they are all among the least densely populated countries in the world[iii]. In addition to the relationship between population and square meter/square feet of land, the Nordic countries are unusually decentralised – compared to other places in Western Europe, more people live in small towns and fewer in big cities. Thus a larger number of Scandinavians use untouched nature actively as a venue for exercise, hobbies, sports, recreation and meditation. This exposure differs from the lives of most urban dwelling Western populations, fostering a deep respect for Mother Nature, resulting from experiencing just how that inferiority actually feels. From getting lost while hiking, a sudden turn of weather completely disorientate you, snow giving in under you and trigger an avalanche, or trapped on a small boat in a storm, and so on. All these experiences define the ingrained respect for nature you find among Nordics and help explain why we believe we shouldn’t piss her off.

Exhibit C: Sovereign wealth, free time and lack of ‘carpe diem’

Now to an exhibit which is hard to label as best practice and copy, but it is none the less an explanation as to why the Northern Europeans spend so much time and energy inventing new sustainable solutions.

The Nordics are all are among the world’s richest countries [iv]. An extensive welfare system and a good work-life balance means that they have more time they can allocate to health, pleasure, leisure and family; but it also means that they have more time to worry about the future of our planet. As soon as fundamental physiological and safety needs are satisfied (goes for most Northern Europeans), you are more likely to worry about potential threats to your current situation.  We feel that global warming and the consequences of it are more frequently talked about with concern in the Nordic countries compared to other countries that has other more precarious things to worry about (i.e. “will this high unemployment affect me?”, “will my salary cover my mortgage this month?”).

Nordic people also seem to live less in the moment than their European counterparts. They seem prone to plan ahead and are more risk averse than other more capitalistic economies. Caution is a considered a virtue and all this translate to environmental awareness. In the Nordics it is enough that researchers know that there will be consequences when average global temperature rises for the population to take it seriously, which makes the long term investment need today supported by the majority of the population.

Exhibit D: Trust in society

Another great driver for cleantech- specific innovation is that Scandinavians trust their government and the new environmental data and research are seldom the target for unnecessary scrutiny. This is of course not always a good thing; the Nordics often balance on the thin line between being trusting and naive. But in terms of cleantech innovation and in terms of motivating citizens to be cleantech entrepreneurs, it is vital that they take the research available seriously. Initial research into rising sea-levels, melting glaciers, warmer ocean depths and so forth was taken seriously early in Scandinavia (even though the link to man-made pollution was hard to prove and cause-effect proof were missing). The Nordic governments did not think it was worth waiting for this evidence before acting, and pushed this research out to the masses. It seems in some other countries that the evidence has never been compelling enough to result in stronger action or to garner support of the population overcoming the endless political manoeuvring.

Part 2 – What is Happening in the Nordics and Can We Learn from The Scandies?

Now we have a better understanding of the Scandinavian mentality Part 2 of this article (forthcoming) will talk about how all of these aspects come together and were exemplified at the fantastic Cleantech Venture Day 2012 attended by GLD in Lathi Finland in April this year.

Watch out for Part 2 soon…

By: James Byrne and Julia Lolleng


[i] Coming Clean: The Global Cleantech Innovation Index 2012”, WWF & Cleantech Group

[ii] Nordic Cleantech Review 01/12

[iv] GDP per capita, 2011, The World Bank webpage

Related posts:

  1. The Hitchikers Guide to Cleantech: A Global Resource for Cleantech Entrepreneurs At first, the Green Light Distrikt was just a place…
  2. Reincarnating “Skunk Works” approach in Cleantech 1943, is the year in which the antecedents of Lockheed…

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Christopher Williams's picture
Thank Christopher for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member
Discussions
Spell checking: Press the CTRL or COMMAND key then click on the underlined misspelled word.
Rick Engebretson's picture
Rick Engebretson on Sep 18, 2012

I can answer the last question. No, you can't learn from Scandinavians.

Leonardus Schmit's picture
Leonardus Schmit on Sep 18, 2012

An interesting effort, but rather speculative and overlooking some basic facts. For this comment I refer mainly to Norway which I know best and is also exemplary for the factors mentioned. So I do not deny these factors, but think tey are less decisive as some other points which I mention below.

As for A. one could argue that the excessive sense of social responsiblity inhibits innovation. This feature ranks the Norwegians arguably among the top most boring people in the world. As for B. the compulsory adoration of Nature, this is seen by some Norwegian thinkers as one factor that inhibits innovation. Norwegians are bombarded with Nature by their media (ad nauseum). In fact less than 20% of the Norwegians bother to move out on Nature experiences unless they are forced too. Just for a fact Norway is the first ranking Pizza eating country in the world and has an uneacceptable high obeisity rate. But I admit Nature is a factor, only in another way that the author seems to be aware of:

1. During the 1970s Norway was among the most affected countries of 'acid rain' coming accross the North Sea from heavily polluting British factories. Indeed the entire forest stock was threatened. This certainly was a motivator for thinking about the environment. 

2. During the 1980s Norway was severly affected by nuclair 'fall out' from Tsjernobyil. Until today reindeer meat from certain regions in Norway is still not allowed on the market. This certainly was a motivator for thinking about the environment. 

 3. Norway and all of Scandinavia (except Denmark) have been thriving on forestry and related pulp and chemical industries. This has created an exceptional high level of critical mass in chemical and hence environment related technology. One could mention experience with the off-shore salmon industry as well. Think about Norsk Hydro (chemics) and Norske Skog as drivers in this field.

4. Since the 1970s Norway's unprecedented wind fall in off shore oil exploration and exploitation this sector  has stimulated an out of proportion high level of innovative technology with a clear environmental edge (oils spills etc.).

Now when one wraps this in a moralistic coat of social responsibility, love of nature, spare time hobbyism of affluent middle classes and high trust in the government system, that's fine with me but please also consider the factors mentioned above. 

 

 

Rick Engebretson's picture
Rick Engebretson on Sep 18, 2012

To differ with both the article and a comment I can focus on something not mentioned in either: computers.

Most manufacturing of high value added nature requires precision automation. While most people exclusively discuss "policy" or "taxes," etc., unless you have production skills, you're just talking.

Currently, the Linux operating system, using open software standards is growing fast. Linux was begun by a Finn, following the design of Unix, using open software. While the US started this, the US now has slipped.

A key windowing interface is KDE, developed in Norway. Compiler tools for microcontrollers are coming from Serbia and Australia as well. The Brits and Americans are hard to find in industrial and new military systems. We flunked science and aced politics.

A land trade route from Scandinavia to China now exists, with much of the world's technology and resources. Few even see it.

They are advancing because they know how to.

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »