This group brings together the best thinkers on energy and climate. Join us for smart, insightful posts and conversations about where the energy industry is and where it is going.


Wasted Decade Delivers Airline CO2 Scheme That’s ‘Bad for Climate’

The Energy  Mix's picture
Blog posts, The Energy Mix

The Energy Mix is a Canadian non-profit that promotes community awareness of, engagement in, and action on climate change, energy, and post-carbon solutions. Each week, we scan up to 1,000 news...

  • Member since 2018
  • 716 items added with 804,583 views
  • Mar 19, 2021

Daniel Eledut/Unsplash

A “ridiculously weak” international carbon offset rule, already seen as giving airlines a three- to six-year free pass to pollute, is set to undermine Europe’s attempts to get its greenhouse gas emissions under control, according to a September 2020 consulting analysis produced for the European Commission and obtained by Brussels-based Transport & Environment under access to information laws.

“We have wasted almost a decade coming up with an airline CO2 scheme which is actually bad for the climate,” T&E aviation manager Jo Dardenne said in a release this week. “Airlines will pay less than a Euro to buy carbon offsets that won’t work. The study is a warning to the EU to take back responsibility for addressing pollution on European flights.”

The Montreal-based International Civil Aviation Organization originally adopted the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA) in 2016, after the industry lobbied successfully to be excluded from the 2015 Paris Agreement. The offset scheme was to be voluntary from 2021 to 2026—and even then, countries were allowed to opt out if they didn’t want to participate.

“As far as we can tell, the current proposals fall well short of ensuring carbon-neutral growth from 2020,” Dan Rutherford, director of the International Council on Clean Transportation’s marine and aviation program, said at the time.

Last July, with the COVID-19 pandemic cratering air travel demand, ICAO’s governing council handed the industry a concession valued at about US$15 billion by changing the way offset requirements were calculated under CORSIA. U.S. climate and aviation specialist Annie Petsonk, then on staff at the Environmental Defense Fund, told Climate Home News the rule change would “deal a triple whammy” to ICAO’s already tattered climate credibility—by giving airlines a free pass to pollute, undermining the trust of countries that don’t hold seats on the ICAO council, and undercutting public confidence in the airlines’ environmental claims.

“Analysis by the Öko-Institut in Germany found that changing the baseline to 2019 could give airlines a free pass to pollute for the next three to six years depending on the speed of the recovery,” Climate Home reported at the time. “A study by the U.S.-based Environmental Defense Fund found similar results.”

Now, Transport & Environment reports, the European Commission analysis shows CORSIA is the continent’s worst option for regulating carbon pollution from air travel and “risks undermining the ability to reach net-zero emissions by mid-century” if it replaces existing EU climate regulations. “It’s questionable whether the carbon offsets actually deliver emissions reductions,” since none of the approved offsetting programs meet all the necessary criteria, and “at less than €1, carbon offsets will be too cheap to deter airlines from growing their emissions.”

That price was driven down by industry lobbying last year that left CORSIA with a supply of offsets that is three times greater than demand, T&E says.

After years of industry delays culminating in a “hopelessly weak CO2 scheme”, the organization is calling on the EU to include all departing flights from European airports in its own emissions trading scheme, as it threatened to do in 2013 and again in 2016.

“Europe should forget about relying on the UN to properly address airline emissions,” Dardenne said. “Offsetting clearly doesn’t work. A reformed EU carbon market and an ambitious green jet fuels law will put airlines on the path to zero emissions.”

Analysis in circulation during the 2015 Paris conference suggested a surging aviation sector could derail global carbon reductions, soaking up 25% of the world’s available carbon budget under a 1.5°C target for average global warming.

Read More

Nathan Wilson's picture
Nathan Wilson on Apr 4, 2021

It comes as no surprise that not much is being done to combat CO2 emissions from aviation.  We should be focused on the low-hanging-fruit, and that is not aviation.

The low-hanging-fruit to which I am referring is obviously electricity.  Not only is electricity one of the three major energy use sectors, but clean electricity is an important tool for decarbonizing the other two (heating and transportation).

Of course it is important to do the preparatory work to develop the solutions for those other sectors that we'll need 20 years down the road, but we should not throw money at implementations now, as that money will produce more benefit when applied to clean electricity.

In theory, offset programs are intended to direct clean energy money in the right direction, but in reality, they are really hard to do well.

Matt Chester's picture
Matt Chester on Apr 5, 2021

Of course it is important to do the preparatory work to develop the solutions for those other sectors that we'll need 20 years down the road, but we should not throw money at implementations now, as that money will produce more benefit when applied to clean electricity.

I definitely agree with this-- but the challenge comes in knowing how hard to steer into this groundwork now to ensure best chance of success down the road. I think what decarbonization in any sector right now is showing is that if we had started these efforts in a real way a decade or two earlier then we'd be in a lot better position than we are now. So when there are limited resources to go around (e.g., gov funding) it definitely makes sense to nail down that low hanging fruit, but who's to say how we determine to right amount of effort to put towards a longer road ahead like aviation? And further, the way science works is such that: what if investment into aviation decarbonization R&D today would incidentally create technology or discoveries that could aptly be applied in other sectors in ways we didn't anticipate? 

The Energy  Mix's picture
The Energy Mix on Apr 5, 2021

Actually, there are some interesting steps the airlines could consider that would require some creative thinking and investment, but might actually insulate them from some of the challenges they'll face in a rapidly warming world, while reducing aviation emissions far more effectively than dreaming up sustainable biofuels or heaping guilt on travellers. (Though anyone who flies should absolutely try to fly a lot less.) But it's like the old joke about how many psychologists it takes to change a light bulb -- just one, so the story goes, but the light bulb has to want to change.

Unfortunately, the bright lights in the international aviation industry spent all their time at the Paris conference lobbying to be left out of the agreement, then issued a press release saying how sad it was that things had turned out that way. And they've been dragging down and diluting their own carbon offset process ever since. Quoting the banner that climate action groups flew over the headquarters of the International Civil Aviation Organization during one of their triennial meetings -- you can't spell 'procrastination' without 'ICAO'.

The Energy  Mix's picture
Thank The Energy for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »