Virginia Utilities Pull Out of Collaboration Working on a Method to Value Solar Energy
- Sep 26, 2014 7:00 pm GMTJul 7, 2018 9:00 pm GMT
- 1426 views
Utilities in Virginia which had been collaborating with local governments, solar stakeholders and academic researchers to agree on a methodology for valuing small solar energy systems have withdrawn their participation leaving the state-directed effort without their future or concluding inputs.
The so-called “Solar Stakeholder Group” (SSG), short for the Distributed Generation and Net Metering Solar Stakeholder Group, coordinated by Virginia’s Department of Mines, Minerals and Energy (DMME) and the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), has been meeting monthly since April. The meetings are led by Damian Pitt, an assistant professor at Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) and a Steering Committee representing investor-owned, rural cooperative and municipal utilities, solar installers/developers, solar system owners, consultants, non-profits and clean energy advocates.
Without the utilities, it’s an open question what weight, if any, the Working Group’s solar methodology will have with Senate Rules Committee. It was Senate Rules Committee Chairman, Democrat John Edwards of Roanoke, who asked for a report with recommendations on how to value solar-generated electricity. Since the Committee began its work, control of the Senate has switched to Republicans; the Rules Committee is now chaired by Republican Ryan McDougle of Ashland.
The value of a rooftop solar system is drawing increasing interest from advocates and a lot scrutiny from utilities since Minnesota became the first U.S. state in March to officially set a value on solar-generated electricity. That value, in the form of a tariff, is a kilowatt hour payment that Minnesota utilities may opt to pay as an alternative to the state’s policy for crediting excess generation of electricity on a monthly or annual basis – known as net metering – at the retail rate paid by homeowners and most businesses.
Minnesota’s valuation was the result of a lengthy process based in part on the Federal government’s calculation of the social cost of fossil-fuel sources of power and their carbon emissions. Tariff’s are unique to each utility. Analysts estimate tariffs in Minnesota are likely to range between 12 and 14 cents per kilowatt hour. The higher the value, the higher revenue drain that such a determination poses for utilities which make money simply by selling more electricity. There is long-running debate in regulatory circles about how to “decouple” utility profits from pure sales.
As a member of the general Group — but not the Steering Committee which held the drafting process close to the vest — I tracked down the latest draft of the report examining various costs and benefits associated with solar energy. It recommends three methods for calculating the value of small solar systems: narrow, intermediate and broad. While the Group did consider the current policy context in conducting its research, no policy recommendations should be expected in the final report.
David Botkins, a spokesperson for Dominion Virginia Power, said after providing “feedback” to a draft report by the Group, it determined “the group has migrated into issues that are more appropriate for the SCC (State Corporation Commission) and General Assembly to consider.”
When asked why Dominion did not assume, from the beginning, that a report from the Group was destined for the Senate, Botkins added, with “the report nearly complete (it has been through several drafts) it seemed an appropriate time to discontinue our participation.”
Susan Rubin, Vice President-Legislative Affairs of the Virginia, Maryland and Delaware Association of Electric Cooperatives informed DMME and DEQ of their withdrawal saying ”We began the process hoping, in the end, the work product would be the result of collaboration. Following the last meeting (in August), it became clear that we must remove ourselves from the list of participating stakeholders as we cannot be associated with the final report this group will issue.”
Pitt of VCU, the Group’s meeting leader, said, “Basically the utilities all said that the report was heading in a direction that they wouldn’t be able to support.” He added, they “wouldn’t say anything specific about what parts of the report they disagreed with.”
The withdrawal is leading several solar advocates to conclude that the utilities opined the valuation methodology headed would set too high a value for solar, setting the stage for a debate, and perhaps legislation, they might have a difficult time controlling. Several long-time observers have long doubted this study would have much, if any, impact because Republicans control the House of Delegates, as well as, the Senate. Neither body has demonstrated interest in enabling markets for cleaner energy in Virginia, even as the economy needs to replace tens of thousands of jobs lost to cut backs in defense contracting.
Some of that control sought by utilities might have been provided by the Department of Environmental Quality’s coordinator of the working group, Carol Wampler. Wampler is a former lobbyist for the Virginia Manufacturers Association whom the utilities trusted to help steer the Group deliberations in a direction they could live with.
But Wampler retired at the end of August. On September 5, the utilities notified various offices of the state government of their withdrawal. Some seasoned political observers familiar with the significant influence Dominion exerts on the General Assembly, agreed that the combination of a harmful report and Wampler’s retirement was too much for them to stomach. Wampler would not comment for this column.
“It looks like the utilities didn’t like what the study is finding, and they are hoping that walking out of the room will make it go away,” said Ivy Main, a prominent blogger about clean energy in Virginia and a participant in the Group. Main has been a vocal critic of in-state utilities’ intransigence about any policy enabling a significant market for solar energy in their service territories.
Utilities have complained that net metering amounts to an unfair subsidy for customers that own solar panels at the expense of those who don’t. Solar advocates counter that the retail rate underestimates the value of solar panels to the grid and society, taking into account the health and environmental impacts of harmful greenhouse gas emissions.
Monique Hanis, of Falls Church, VA, a member of the Group’s Steering Committee representing solar system owners who formerly was senior manager of the national Solar Energy Industries Association, said she was “excited about the possibilities of working together with utilities, companies, municipal leaders and conservation groups, not just on this report, but on expanding options for customers to ‘go solar,’ creating more jobs and driving innovation across the state.”
Hanis continued: “Given all the meetings and the work invested so far by so many representatives, I am disappointed that Dominion Power and the other utilities pulled out of our collaborative effort at the last-minute.
“This is a short-sighted move and makes the utilities look bad, frankly. However, I ex
pect that the group will move forward with our public stakeholder process to deliver the report on time to the General Assembly,” she added.
Republican Ryan McDougle, Chairman of the Virginia Senate Rules Committee. He may determine the fate of efforts to value home solar systems. CREDIT: @ryanmcdougle on Twitter
Ken Jurman at DMME e-mailed the Group’s participants this week outlining 3 options:
1) end the study with the latest draft reflecting the utilities’ views through the Sept. 5 meeting;
2) send the draft to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) followed by additional Group meetings before the Nov. 1 deadline if time permits; or
3) submit the draft with NREL’s comments but no more inputs from the Group or Steering Committee.
The Group is scheduled to decide on how to proceed at a meeting in Glen Allen, VA on Friday, Oct. 3. What happens to its final recommendations due by November 1 could be influenced by Democratic Gov. Terry McAuliffe. The draft or final Report could officially be sent to Sen. Edwards, the previous Rules Committee Chairman. Some observers expect Sen. McDougle, the current Senate Rules Committee Chairman, to dismiss or otherwise table the recommendations.
Neither McDougle, nor Hayes Framme, a McAuliffe aide who has coordinated the administration’s plans to update the state’s Energy Plan, responded to requests for comment.