This group brings together the best thinkers on energy and climate. Join us for smart, insightful posts and conversations about where the energy industry is and where it is going.

Post

U.S. Can Save $3.5 Trillion by Launching Climate Transition Today, Not Waiting Until 2030

The Energy  Mix's picture
Blog posts The Energy Mix

The Energy Mix is a Canadian non-profit that promotes community awareness of, engagement in, and action on climate change, energy, and post-carbon solutions. Each week, we scan up to 1,000 news...

  • Member since 2018
  • 716 items added with 780,096 views
  • Feb 10, 2021
  • 800 views

stevepb/Pixabay

The United States can save US$3.5 trillion by launching a serious greenhouse gas reduction effort now, rather than waiting until 2030—without even factoring in the public health benefits of fossil fuel reductions, or the avoided cost of climate-driven extreme weather, according to a new report by San Francisco-based Energy Innovation.

“If action begins in 2030, the cost of transitioning to a clean energy economy will be an estimated 75% higher than if action were to begin this year,” Quartz reports. “That works out to roughly $750 billion each year in the 2030 scenario (for a total of about $8 trillion), compared to peak costs of $320 billion per year if early action is taken (for a total of $4.5 trillion).”

And those cost savings “only consider the spending required to slash U.S. emissions,” Climate Nexus adds, in a post republished by EcoWatch. That means the numbers “do not include the savings that would be incurred by the public health benefits of reducing fossil fuel extraction and combustion, or the avoided costs associated with extreme weather which delayed climate action could worsen.”

“The upshot is the next decade is critical,” the report states. “The longer we wait, the more drastic the cuts—and associated costs—will be.”

Energy Innovation’s estimates “are roughly in line with other studies in the scientific literature that show costs go up faster the later climate initiatives begin,” Quartz says, citing Breakthrough Institute climate and energy director Zeke Hausfather. “Every year of delay means more fossil fuel facilities will need to be retired early, and more clean energy deployed annually, to meet the same target.”

For example, a 10-year lag in climate policies would mean a nine-fold increase in the amount of renewable energy capacity required by the mid-2030s, resulting in a global economic shock. “In addition to accumulating higher costs, delaying climate action requires astounding rates of clean energy deployment and buildout of manufacturing capacity,” the report states.

Energy Innovation also warns of the massive risk of stranded fossil assets, with construction of new fossil-fuelled industrial facilities and equipment followed by a “seismic shift starting in 2030,” Axios says. In that scenario, “we will need to retire much more polluting equipment before the end of its functional life,” Energy Innovation warns. “And that isn’t cheap.”

“To meet climate goals, it is imperative to start climate action today,” report co-author Megan Mahajan told Earther. “In particular, it is urgent to quickly transition to electric vehicles and building components, because polluting equipment sold today will last for decades.”

Read More

The Energy  Mix's picture
Thank The Energy for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member
Discussions
Spell checking: Press the CTRL or COMMAND key then click on the underlined misspelled word.
John Snyder's picture
John Snyder on Feb 12, 2021

Electrification is a luxury only available to wealthy, powerful nations.

 

Physical laws do not change.  

 

Solar and wind power were basically abandoned in the 20th century because of fundamental flaws that cannot be changed.  

 

They are unpredictable and unreliable.  And these flaws can be deadly if the energy isn't there when you need it. 

 

Without electricity, neither wind or solar replace the energy required to do work supplied by man or beast.

 

But electricity requires significant wealth in a society to generate, transmit and control its distribution.   Without that wealth, a society does not have electricity.

 

Wealth is created by man's machines that perform predictably, reliably, affordably, and multiply the work of a single human being or beast of burden by orders of magnitude.

 

Our machines work when powered by fossil fuels, nuclear, and the electricity generated by these two energy sources.  Remove fossil fuels and only electricity remains.  Electricity that is a luxury of wealthy, powerful societies.

 

Fossil fuels will always be necessary.  We can't legislate the laws of physics to change that. 

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »