This group brings together the best thinkers on energy and climate. Join us for smart, insightful posts and conversations about where the energy industry is and where it is going.


Trying to Change a Climate Skeptic's Mind? Don't Bother

Scott Edward Anderson's picture
, EY (Ernst & Young)

Scott Edward Anderson is the founder of the popular blog, The Green Skeptic. A cleantech investor and entrepreneur, he founded VerdeStrategy, and is currently a director with EY's (Ernst &...

  • Member since 2018
  • 184 items added with 58,668 views
  • Feb 10, 2011

If I had a dollar for every time a self-proclaimed “climate hawk” or environmentalist said they had the key to convincing “climate skeptics,” I’d create a pretty awesome adaptation and innovation fund that could invest in more worthwhile pursuits.

My good friends at The Nature Conservancy‘s Cool Green Science blog are usually pretty level-headed as far as environmentalists go. And today’s post actually has some pretty good links and resources for information on the science of climate change.

Yet, the title sends the wrong message: “How to Change a Climate Skeptic’s Mind.”


I’m not convinced it’s worth the effort. I also think there are three reasons the public doesn’t see eye-to-eye with scientists on climate change:

1.) People don’t trust “Science,” with a capital S.
2.) Environmentalists rely on fear as a motivator.
3.) The culture of NOW: climate change impacts are not immediate; concerns over health, safety, finances are immediate.

([Artwork by SHEPARD FAIREY])

“Climate deniers” (I won’t call them skeptics, for obvious reasons) are preying on all three points, just as good marketers will. They know how to hit home. The reaction from the so-called “climate hawks” is to promote the crisis with more panic.

And the climate scientists react with more…well, science.

What’s wrong with this picture?

Fear is a good motivator when the danger is immediate. We’ve survived many encounters with predator species in our long evolution. Fear helps us respond to immediate threats – and quickly.

Over the long-term, however, fear breeds inertia. While the arguments continue, the climate changes, and we lose our share of the new economy. Nothing gets done.

As for the science, it needs to be simple, transparent, and backed up by real-life examples rather than datasets and models. People don’t respond to data and models, they respond to real, tangible things that touch their lives.

In his recent book, Denialism: How Irrational Thinking Hinders Scientific Progress, Harms the Planet, and Threatens Our Lives New Yorker staff writer Michael Specter opines that Americans mistrust institutions and especially the institution of science more today than ever before, believing that it’s a political constituency that doesn’t always have our best interests in mind.

We shouldn’t be talking about trying to “convince,” but rather to trying to show. (Remember that old adage about showing not telling?)

Finally, the message must come from someone other than a liberal politician or member of the choir. It is too easy for people, the media, etc., to dismiss climate change and the environment as a “left issue.”

It is a universal issue and will require a universal response.

I think Evan Girvetz, the blogger and a senior scientist with The Nature Conservancy’s Global Climate Change Program, was actually onto something with an earlier post called “Translating How Climate Change Will Impact Your Backyard.”

At least that post brought the potential impacts closer to home.

Rick Engebretson's picture
Rick Engebretson on Feb 10, 2011

In Minnesota this winter, your title should change from “Don’t Bother” to “Don’t Dare.” Any talk of it on the Minneapolis Startribune blog generates threats. It has been below zero F pretty steadily for two months now and people have other things on their mind. Everybody is giddy it might break freezing in a few days. I hope I still have a roof under the glacier up there. When you’ve plowed snow on a steel tractor seat when its below zero you lose the mood to talk science.

But with the cold, a planned gas fired power plant is now discussed for cogenerating useful heat. The greed instinct is the last to freeze.

Rick Engebretson's picture
Rick Engebretson on Feb 11, 2011

The biggest problem with the “experts” is how easily they are proven ignorant.

For example, a few days ago there was an article in the Startribune bragging about a rural MN. college going high tech green with windmills and corn cob gasification. Of course that is what their great-grandparents did, but they just called it a corn cob stove. One snob berated a critic saying the gasifier produced methane, and the corn cobs were waste. Then some mentioned whole corn plants were once chopped as silage, and a very good feed. As well, gasification does not produce methane. Then we all got into the production carbon costs, soil, etc. In the end, the snob expert routine backfired.

From the simple as it gets category, where do we stand on natural gas cogeneration? All this hyper complex maybe stuff is great. But if anybody is really serious about cutting Carbon and improving infrastructure, this is a no brainer.

Scott Edward Anderson's picture
Scott Edward Anderson on Feb 11, 2011

Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts,” Richard Feynman said. 

I think natural gas cogeneration is essential, easy, cheap and available. We need to fire on all cylinders, in my opinion.  If we can address the issues with fracking, natural gas is a real win.



Scott Edward Anderson's picture
Thank Scott Edward for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network® is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »