This group brings together the best thinkers on energy and climate. Join us for smart, insightful posts and conversations about where the energy industry is and where it is going.


Transmission Investment Gets Largest Boost Since 2000

Katherine Tweed's picture
Greentech Media
  • Member since 2018
  • 180 items added with 98,664 views
  • Dec 27, 2013

Investor-owned utilities and transmission companies invested a record $34.9 billion in transmission and distribution infrastructure in 2012, according to the Edison Electric Institute.

transmission investment

The spending on transmission, $14.8 billion, was nearly a 24 percent increase over 2011 investments. It is the largest year-over-year percentage increase since 2000. The spending is driven by many factors, including large transmission projects and interconnection of renewable sources such as utility-scale solar projects and wind farms. EEI found in another report that about three-quarters of transmission spending through 2023 will be to integrate renewables.

Transmission is hardly the sexiest topic in grid modernization, but it is key to the changing energy landscape. In some regions, particularly the Midwest, transmission projects are helping to minimize the burden on the grid as older coal-fired power plants retire.

In some areas, upgraded transmission and energy efficiency were able to completely offset the closing of coal plants. Some East Coast utilities attribute the increase to post-Sandy hardening of the grid, according to EEI. Just this week, the USDA announced $1.8 billion for rural grid modernization, with the bulk going to transmission and distribution.

Other factors are also making it easier for transmission projects to move forward. In 2011, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission passed Order No. 1000, which reformed the cost allocation and planning requirements for transmission projects. It was largely seen as a boon to move projects forward that would support renewables, but has also helped to integrate more gas-fired power plants into the grid.

Earlier this year, EEI had revised some of its transmission investments downward after some large projects were canceled. The organization expected investment to peak in 2012 at around $14 billion. That forecast has now ben revised upward with a peak of about $17.5 billion in 2013 and only a slightly smaller figure of $17 billion in 2014.

greentech mediaGreentech Media (GTM) produces industry-leading news, research, and conferences in the business-to-business greentech market. Our coverage areas include solar, smart grid, energy efficiency, wind, and other non-incumbent energy markets. For more information, visit: , follow us on twitter: @greentechmedia, or like us on Facebook:

Katherine Tweed's picture
Thank Katherine for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member
Spell checking: Press the CTRL or COMMAND key then click on the underlined misspelled word.
Bob Meinetz's picture
Bob Meinetz on Dec 26, 2013

Katherine, many Americans are coming to realize that transmission can be decidedly unsexy. Though it is key to the changing energy landscape, it’s also key to the changing physical landscape, and when transmission lines and turbines appear there is a visceral appreciation of the aesthetic and ecological impacts of hooking up all that distributed generation:

The [PJM transmission] projects had caused concern among environmentalists and consumer advocates for the impact they could have on the Chesapeake Bay and on utility bills. Adoption of the recommendation would all but kill the projects, which were proposed by energy companies before the recession, when strain on the grid raised concern of future brownouts and rolling blackouts.

Environmental groups such as the Sierra Club and Chesapeake Bay Foundation had expressed concern about MAPP’s impact on wetlands, pressing for an objective study of alternatives to determine whether the project was necessary.

Across the state, wind farms like the Kingdom Community Wind Project are being sharply criticized for having what opponents claim to be a disruptive impact on the landscape. The situation in Lowell has developed into a particularly contested dispute.


Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »