This group brings together the best thinkers on energy and climate. Join us for smart, insightful posts and conversations about where the energy industry is and where it is going.

Post

Solar for $1/W - Really?

Solar Energy Costs

Can you get a solar system at under the magical $1/W? You betcha. But I am increasingly of the view that systems priced at these levels are either built with smoke and mirrors or there is a magic formula that a very select number of companies have managed to find.

If you shop around you can find a surprising number of offers from a wide variety of companies at $1w or even less. A consumer wrote to me yesterday about one such offer and my advice was blunt; don’t do it.

I listed a bunch of reasons, but in the simplest of terms my view is that any solar company selling at this level is extraordinarily unlikely to survive in the medium term (if not short term), making it a bad long term investment.

Now to be clear, low cost solar at this price (or better) is clearly a wonderful thing for the growth of our industry; its been talked about as the “tipping point” for PV parity for decades. So I want to see it as much as anyone else and we need to get there. However, pricing systems at this level before we are truly able to do so in a financially sustainable way has only two possible outcomes in my humble opinion; bankruptcy or customers getting junk products and services.

If there are any solar magicians out there who would like to share their secret formula with me for how to do it well at this price, I’m all ears. I looked (again) at a bunch of data points to see where things are up to and see if I could unlock secret formula myself and this is what we found.

Up until late last year, the Clean Energy Regulator used to publish data on “out of pocket expense” (OOPE); the net PV price after STC’s and fully installed. It was an awesomely powerful data set because it was’t a hypothetical price, but a sold and installed price; real money.

Typically, the CER’s OOPE had hovered around $2/W, which was just a little higher than average pricing that was seen in the market, highlighting teh difference between what we see advertised versus what people actually end up paying. Since their last publication, foreign exchange rates have gone the wrong way and PV prices have increased.

Solar Choice also regularly publish sample data from offers that they receive from their network of installers. Their latest data was published in March and historically correlates with CER data very well so its a powerful data sample too, although the difference is it is quoted rather than installed price. Their data shows a clear increase since late last year; evidence that the majority of system offers have risen since the final OOPE release and confirming the trend we believe has happened.

So what on earth is going on?

I re-ran some numbers (as I tend to do) based on a survey of installation companies on system price that we collected late last year. No matter how hard I tried, I couldn’t arrive at a net price under $1/W net, even using the very lowest component prices that we got as samples. So I reduced them by all by 10%, despite the fact that prices have actually increased and I still couldn’t get there. This assumes that the lowest quality (and cheapest) products are used, installers are paid a pittance and gross margins are less than 10%. Still couldn’t get there.

Then I thought, maybe I’m out of touch, maybe my data is wrong, so I called the largest wholesaler in the country and asked them if it was possible. “Not a friggen chance, Nige” was the reply. “We are increasingly contacted by customers saying you have to do something; we are getting beaten by price and you are the biggest buyer, so c’mon, do something”. Their response was that it makes no sense because their margins are so low already.

To add to the research mix, totally by chance, I was lucky enough to meet with a researcher from the Rocky Mountains Institute this week. The RMI was founded in 1982 by Amory Lovins who is a legend in sustainability and established the RMI as a dedicated research, publication, consulting, and lecturing institute in the general field of sustainability, with a special focus on profitable innovations for energy and resource efficiency. It was Lovin’s who first inspired me to consider energy when he was a guest speaker at an event I attended 24 years ago.

In recent times, RMI have been looking at the “soft costs” of solar; the non equipment related costs, with the aim of helping reduce solar system costs in the US where they are a much more significant component of system price. We had a great chat about how different the cost build up is in Australia and they are presently touring the country trying to learn how Australian solar companies can do solar so much cheaper then US companies. Interestingly, my take away was that US solar companies are much more focused on profit than many Australian solar companies!

So, costs are up. Sales are down. The data we have says it’s not possible. Why is it happening?

There are three possible reasons.

The first is that companies selling under $1/w have a magic formula, which the remaining 99% of the market hasn’t figured out yet.

Perhaps they can buy everything cheaper than everyone else by buying on the spot market for clearance stock, trade STCs at a higher price and their overheads are incredibly low. Maybe their cost of customer acquisition, administration and compliance costs are staggeringly well refined. It’s possible but highly unlikely and at a minimum, as precarious as a house of cards.

The second possibility is that they are happy to run at a loss to get volume. Businesses do that from time to time and it’s a legitimate strategy if it has an end game or can be subsidised by other revenues and margins through diversity.

It’s the big worm approach; low prices attract customers, then you up-sell like mad, praying you won’t actually have to deliver at that low price. The problem is, low prices establish a customer expectation which can drag the whole market down into a price war.

But frankly, I don’t buy this strategy . We are in a market with declining volumes and declining prices. In a year, you’ll sell the same volume for 5% less revenue if things keep heading the same way. If you sell with no profit today, in 12 months, assuming the same effort to sell, you margin dollars will be less per sale. It’s not rocket science.

The third possibility, and one I fear, is that too many solar businesses don’t understand their real costs and think they will make a small profit at ultra-low prices, because they don’t understand what it takes to really do the business properly. Proof? The survey we conducted late last year sought to break out costs in detail and a common response was “Wow, I have no idea what (for example) my customer acquisition cost is, I should look at that!”

The most prevalent example of this is in commercial systems where I see prices just get lower and lower and lower under the false assumption that scale equals lower cost. All things being equal, its true, but anyone who has spent months courting company directors, producing endless iterations of CAD drawings, presenting option after option, paying engineers and realising that grid connection approvals will cost tens of thousands of dollars knows it blows out quickly.

Complexity sucks up scale benefits faster than an angry death-eater.

So, here’s my thinking.

1) Companies who promote at $1W or less need to up-sell like hungry dogs or they will go bust. Competitive pressure is making up-selling harder

2) Companies who sell at $1W and don’t up-sell will dig a hole that they can’t get out of and go bust and or, the house of cards will tumble one day (remember Unleash and Clear?) and then they’ll go bust or, the warranty and quality issues will send them bust.

3) Companies, who recognise that margin dollars need to increase as revenues and volumes decline will struggle, sell less but make more margin dollars and probably survive. If you are clever and have a new angle, you might even prosper and take market share.

Whilst things are clearly not easy, the opportunity today is for our market to innovate, to add value, to increase revenue and more importantly, to increase margin dollars. There are many ways to do it with products, services, and value.

One thing is for sure, any-one can buy a bucket of fat worms, but it’s a short term and simple approach that without exception, has failed miserably in this industry to date. I am boggled that companies continue to line up at the worm store along with other desperate souls then throw their lines in the water together.

My grandfather taught me decades ago that fishing somewhere else, with a different bit of bait makes a whole lot more sense.

The post Solar for $1/W – really? appeared first on Solar Business Services.

Nigel Morris's picture

Thank Nigel for the Post!

Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.

Discussions

Gary Tulie's picture
Gary Tulie on Apr 5, 2014 4:20 pm GMT

Levelised cost of electricity is the important factor, and the best levelised cost is not usually achieved by buying the cheepest of everything!

1. The solar panels – a high quality panel may well last 30, 40, or even 50 years whilst a low grade panel may begin to show significant loss of capacity, or even fail through delamination in 5 to 10 years.

2. High efficiency panels – even at a higher cost, this can be worth having because other hardware and soft costs such as getting permissions are less expensive. You also get more capacity on a limited amount of roof.

3. Inverters – paying a bit more for the inverter often can result in a better MPPT tracker, higher conversion efficiency, and longer inverter life so more annual kWh for a given nominal capacity and lower O & M costs. 

4. Installation – a professional installation is less likely to cause a leak in the roof, or to suffer from failed connectors and cables etc. 

5. Warranty – if something goes wrong, it is better to have good warranties from both manufacturers and installers even at a slightly higher cost. 

William Hughes-Games's picture
William Hughes-Games on Apr 7, 2014 9:24 pm GMT

Hi Nigel

I’d happily pay double the oft quoted $1/w but in my balywhack at least, it is not worth while to install solar.  It has noting to do with the cost of the equipment or the amount of sunshine we have (between 3 and 3.5 peak hours where I live) and everything to do with the regulatory framework between the small installer, the power company and the government.  If this was sorted out, I am pretty sure a lot of people would go into solar.  No need for silly FIT’s such as they have (had) in Germany.  Just a system that is fair to the small solar operator and the power company.  Have a look at the following and then if you have time, tell me what the regulatory framework is in your neck of the woods.

http://mtkass.blogspot.co.nz/2013/10/solar-power-and-ratchet.html

http://mtkass.blogspot.co.nz/2013/06/net-metering.html

Regards

William

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »