This group brings together the best thinkers on energy and climate. Join us for smart, insightful posts and conversations about where the energy industry is and where it is going.



image credit: Financial Times
Chris Amstutz's picture
Senior Analyst, Risk Management & Electricity, GETCHOICE!

Chris Amstutz joined Choice! Energy Management, now GETCHOICE! in 2017. With an emphasis on identifying Natural Gas and Electricity market opportunities for clients, Amstutz publishes market...

  • Member since 2018
  • 29 items added with 18,153 views
  • Apr 6, 2022

We regret to inform you; the politicians are back at it again. We have commented on politics in energy numerous times in the past, and today we look to address the volley of energy headlines that have come out in recent weeks. Like every topic, there is nuance and gray area that is difficult to explain to those outside the energy industry. Today we start a new blog series to address ongoing questions from popular headlines in the industry. Here are some of the recent headlines with additional nuance discussed.

Will Biden’s Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) Release Lower Gasoline Prices?

This article reports that the White House predicts gasoline prices to fall 10-30 cents per gallon on the announcement that 180 million barrels of oil would be released for U.S. consumption. SPR releases have had mixed results in the past and it is difficult to say what the final outcome for this will be. The visible outcome thus far, is that the market has lowered WTI oil price futures for the next 6 months, but increased prices beyond that point (see chart below). This is due to producers adapting their production outputs lower in the long run due to lower profit margins in the short run. So all in all, the more complicated answer is that politicians can marginally adjust oil and natural gas prices in the short run but these policies have rippling, unintended consequences in the future. Upward price movements, like what we have seen in the last 6 months, ultimately are tied to long term fundamentals of supply and demand against the back drop of industry trends.

Has the U.S. given up on the Green Energy transition?

This article discusses the “reluctance of President Biden to unleash clean energy rhetoric”. Green energy topics do not typically poll well when energy prices are high (hence the President’s reluctance), but many U.S. and European politicians believe that high prices are the catalyst to increasing renewable energy sources on the grid. The reality is that the U.S. is still not close to a macro, nationwide green future due to the sheer scale in technology required to change the current system. However, micro, individual business level green-initiatives are becoming more popular due to the ability to save money on utilities. The platform GET: Smart Management Technology (formerly Choice! Data Connect), allows businesses to benchmark usage, track Scope 2 & 3 carbon emissions, and quantify savings from these green initiatives at the site level. This trend will grow due to high energy prices and the need for increased cost efficiencies.

Are Oil, Natural Gas, and Electricity Prices Increasing Because of Vladimir Putin?

The White House recently published this fact sheet, addressing “Putin’s price hike at the pump”. While it is easy and convenient to blame high energy prices on the Russian invasion of Ukraine, it is but a small factor in the energy market price increase, and should not be used as a meaningful procurement strategy. The truth is, oil, natural gas, and electricity prices began rising in the summer of 2021 to now (up over 100% year over year), due to chronic underinvestment in the energy industry. COVID-19 lockdowns destroyed demand for hydrocarbons, leading to some of the biggest financial losses in the history of American petroleum. The White House now claims that these same companies are gouging Americans, ignoring the need for producers to show a financial return to investors who also lost heavily in 2020-2021. This, coupled with policies that have inhibited domestic pipeline growth and drilling, has added to the global energy shortages we see today. In all reality, Vladimir Putin likely sees the global energy shortage and lack of energy security as an opportunity to advance Russia’s interests in Ukraine, knowing that Europe has no other choice than to buy their petroleum.

The path forward for energy prices is unclear. The answer to the blog question is that President Biden has only a limited capability to affect energy prices in the short run, but the effects of policies today could shape prices two years from now. In the same right, President Biden cannot be blamed fully for today’s energy prices, which were set in to motion during the height of COVID-19. Government directed policy has a tendency to cause the opposite of what is intended in an industry as complex as energy. The facts remain that the globe has felt the effects of an energy shortage since last summer and it will likely continue to be felt for another year as the market stabilizes. The current administration has vocally opposed the use of hydrocarbons, but is quickly realizing the damaging economic effects of a world without them. 

Jim Stack's picture
Jim Stack on Apr 9, 2022

Chris, Burning oil as gas for over 100 years is very dumb. The new Biden plan adds Fast Charging in the USA. It gets more Electric vehicles made and helps battery research. Driving electric is 4 times more efficient. Batteries get better each year. They can run on Renewable energy. They don't need a transmission or oil or gas. No mufflers or catalytic converters. 

   The US has been subsidizing oil for over 50 years. They make deadly carbon pollution like carbon monoxide , carbon, dioxide and sodium dioxide.  the brakes almost never wear. They are much better. 

Chris Amstutz's picture
Chris Amstutz on Apr 13, 2022

Jim I appreciate the response and position.

To me, the story of human civilization and progress directly follows the access to denser forms of energy. Nuclear energy being the pinnacle of this progress. Since the U.S. does not seem to be promoting Nuclear energy (right, wrong, indifferent), it seems the only viable option to keep society running at the pace and level we have come to enjoy, is through fossil fuels. Maybe we shouldn't have set it up that way 100 years ago, but I don't dwell in the past what ifs.

The fact is, the U.S. and Europe are finding out the hard way that we are not going to be able to, nor should we make a push to net zero emissions, unless the goal is to wreck the economy and enjoy a much lower standard of living in order to spur new innovation for green energy.

I really do not care what happens in the energy space, but the indications are clear that an anti-fossil fuel stance at this point in history without switching to nuclear energy is an anti-human progress stance.

Chris Amstutz's picture
Thank Chris for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »