This group brings together the best thinkers on energy and climate. Join us for smart, insightful posts and conversations about where the energy industry is and where it is going.


SaskPower Unveils First Commercial-Scale, Coal-Fired Power Plant to Capture Carbon

For the first time ever, a large-scale, coal-fired power plant is capturing carbon dioxide to keep it from being released into the atmosphere – a milestone for a technology critical to addressing climate change.

Canadian electric utility SaskPower has switched on unit 3 at its Boundary Dam power plant, about 10 miles from the North Dakota border, and will hold an official grand opening Oct. 2. Following a $1.2 billion retrofit, the 46-year-old, 110-megawatt coal unit is now on course toward capturing 90 percent of its carbon emissions. Other upgrades reduce nitrous oxide emissions and capture 100 percent of the unit’s sulfur dioxide emissions.

Numerous commercial-scale carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology projects have been deployed in the industrial sector. In the power sector, demonstration-scale projects have been deployed, but this is the first commercial-scale project.

We will need to construct hundreds of such projects (along with other zero- and lower-emitting technologies) if greenhouse gas emissions are to be reduced to levels that avoid the worst effects of climate change. According to the International Energy Agency, more than 440 terawatt-hours (TWh) of CCS must be generated between 2020 and 2035 to give us a chance of limiting global temperature rise to 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial levels. To get a sense of that scale, SaskPower’s unit 3 can produce up to 1 TWh of electricity per year.

The Boundary Dam project is important not just because it’s the first of its kind, but because it demonstrates a way to help make carbon capture technology economically viable — by turning unwanted pollutants into valuable commodities. SaskPower has agreed to transport and sell its captured carbon dioxide (CO2) to an oilfield operated by Cenovus for use in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) operations. The captured CO2 helps coax additional production from declining oil fields and results in the permanent storage of the CO2 underground. (In addition, captured sulfur dioxide emissions will be used to produce 50 tons per day of sulfuric acid for industrial customers, and SaskPower will sell the plant’s coal combustion residuals, also known as coal ash, for use in construction products like drywall and concrete.)

Selling captured carbon dioxide for use in enhanced oil recovery provides a vital revenue stream for CCS projects, helping offset high investment costs, particularly for first-movers like SaskPower. In fact, most existing or planned carbon capture projects in the world today are taking advantage of CO2-EOR. In the process, they are helping to advance the technology and demonstrate its broader potential in curbing carbon emissions.

Other factors also came together to make this project work, including the fact that SaskPower has an abundant source of inexpensive lignite coal near the power plant, and if need be, SaskPower can securely store its CO2 emissions in a nearby, deep-underground saline formation. Available storage will be critical for all CCS projects in the near-term, especially if an EOR option is not available.

SaskPower refurbished the coal unit at a cost of $300 million. Building the capture facility was projected to cost around $790 million, of which the Canadian government contributed $220 million.

When I visited the plant earlier this year, SaskPower acknowledged that the capture facility had been over-engineered to ensure it would deliver on its targeted 90 percent capture rate. Right-sizing future capture facilities and applying lessons learned during construction of this facility mean the costs for similar projects will come down over time, which is critical to wider deployment and lower global CO2 emissions.

carbon capture creation done

That’s important because coal-fired electricity generation is not going away anytime soon. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, in an analysis of its recently proposed carbon limits for existing power plants, projects coal will still supply more than 30 percent of U.S electricity in 2030, down only 9 percentage points from today’s levels. Meanwhile, coal use in the developing world is soaring. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s International Energy Outlook, coal consumption in developing countries, led by China and India, is expected to increase 70 percent by 2040.

With more than 2,300 coal-fired power plants around the world, deployment of post-combustion carbon capture and storage technology like what’s in use at the Boundary Dam power plant is an important way to reduce greenhouse gases and a significant step in the right direction.

Doug Vine's picture

Thank Doug for the Post!

Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.


Hops Gegangen's picture
Hops Gegangen on Oct 1, 2014 5:18 pm GMT


If the CO2 is used for EOR, isn’t there about as much carbon coming out of the well as is put into it?


Dan Mantena's picture
Dan Mantena on Oct 1, 2014 8:31 pm GMT

SaskPower has agreed to transport and sell its captured carbon dioxide (CO2) to an oilfield operated by Cenovus for use in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) operations.”

So does the CCS help us overall?  Oil has carbon emissoins higher than natural gas and lower than coal. 

Ed Dodge's picture
Ed Dodge on Oct 1, 2014 11:02 pm GMT

It is good news that Boundary Dam is finally up and running. This is one of the cleanest coal power plants in the world, capturing and utilizing essentially all of the emissions. The sulfur is turned into byprodcucts and so is the ash waste. 

The CO2 capture is very significant as well since this plant is a high profile test site for the entire industry to judge how retrofits on existing power plants can work. CO2 for EOR has enormous and generally underappreciated potential for soaking up many gigatons of CO2. It is good for everyone for Boundary Dam to be a success and model for how other power plants can be upgraded for carbon capture.

Bob Meinetz's picture
Bob Meinetz on Oct 2, 2014 6:20 pm GMT

Doug, you write that SaskPower

“is now on course toward capturing 90 percent of its carbon emissions…”

Will it be possible to verify that 90% is truly being captured and sequestered, or are we forced to rely on the company’s forthrightness that it is, when they could simply send it skyward more profitably and with little risk of detection?

Doug Vine's picture
Doug Vine on Oct 2, 2014 6:29 pm GMT

Dan, Hops,

Great questions.

In the case where the marketplace allows oil produced via CO2-EOR to displace oil produced via other methods that don’t store CO2, then CO2-EOR is very carbon negative.

The U.S. Department of Energy has been and continues to study the total emissions impact of CO2-EOR. Based on general industry experience, we know that for every 2.5 barrels of oil produced that around a metric ton of CO2 is stored underground. We know from extensive research of the Weyburn-Midale oilfield in Saskatchewan, where more than 27 Mt of CO2 has been injected and stored since 2000, that the manmade CO2 forms compounds and does not leak from the deep underground formation. In addition, because CO2-EOR recovers oil from previously developed oil reservoirs, no new land is disturbed.



Doug Vine's picture
Doug Vine on Oct 2, 2014 7:38 pm GMT

See above

Doug Vine's picture
Doug Vine on Oct 2, 2014 7:30 pm GMT

Good questions, George. My colleague, Patrick Falwell, breaks it down this way.

First, many states have oil fields that are candidates for CO2-EOR. Ten states have existing CO2-EOR operations and at least 23 states have CO2-EOR potential. Here’s a good place for more information:

As for the question about where to store the CO2, when it’s used for enhanced oil recovery, the CO2 stays underground in the oil field. This process has been done for over 40 years (largely using naturally occurring instead of manmade CO2). The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) recently reported that the nation has the capacity to store, on average, 3,000 metric gigatons (Gt) of CO2 in geologic basins around the country. USGS states that is more than 500 times the 2011 annual U.S. energy-related CO2 emissions. Finally, the CO2 that is used for enhanced oil recovery operations is highly pressurized and in a liquid form, so it takes up much less space than gaseous CO2.

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »