This group brings together the best thinkers on energy and climate. Join us for smart, insightful posts and conversations about where the energy industry is and where it is going.


Reactions to the increase in global energy demand during the transition to low carbon economies

Jon Arteta Ibinarriaga's picture
Consultant Freelance

  Jon is an Industrial Engineer contributing to the development of the Energy sector. Through a solid technical base, polyvalent approaches and a multidisciplinary character, Jon has developed...

  • Member since 2019
  • 5 items added with 2,310 views
  • Apr 15, 2019

On February 14, BP published its annual "Energy Outlook 2019" report. In this document, the British company analyses, in various scenarios, the different elements that affect the energy market and its evolution.  

The report, following the line of its predecessors, highlights the growth on global energy demand, expected to increase by 30% in 2040. This data, resembles the one published by similar papers analysing the sector, such as the "Shell Sustainability report 2017" (Shell), which indicates a 50% increase in demand by the year 2060, or the "International Energy Outlook 2017" (US Energy Information Administration), indicating a growth of 28% in 2040.  

At the present, energy consumption has grown from 2.1% in 2017 to 2.3% in 2018, by-product of the expansion of the global economy (+3.7% in 2018). The rapid development of countries like China, India or Brazil, consequence of the fast industrialisation, improvements in transport and increasing infrastructure, has derived into greater purchasing power of the local population. As a result, international market growth triggers the need for energy generation.  

Your access to Member Features is limited.

Climate factors also accelerate the need for energy, as the increasing application of heating and cooling services in different areas of the globe has brought up fuel demand. A demand where natural gas stands out as today's world leader, representing almost 45% of the overall market share. Renewable energy, on the other hand, grows in a continuous pace, reporting more than a 4% raise in 2018, consequence of the boost in electricity generation. 

In that regard, it seems essential to propose an energy strategy that considers, not only the climatic repercussions of larger needs, but also the position of European companies in this new paradigm.  

Under the globalised environment we live in, cooperation between neighbour countries proves necessary, if not inevitable, both in the regulatory field and for the development of projects engaging with innovation. The race on renewables, under the imminent threat of climate change, makes international relationships essential, as well as the investment in low carbon markets. In consequence, sharing a common objective with strategic economies presents as a key feature to be considered.  

In this context, the European Commission has worked since 2009 in favour of transitioning towards renewable energy, seeking to position the EU as the world leader. However, only 17% of the European energy today comes from renewable sources (2016 data), aspiring to reach 20% by the year 2020. At the same time, the current energy policy only contemplates countries inside the Union, putting its effectiveness into question. (Updated data on the commitment and strategy of the European Union can be found in "The Energy Union Strategy" reports)  

The limited progress made this past 2018 in regards to energy efficiency should also be taken into account, since energy efficiency, today, represents the largest potential source for CO2 savings in the energy landscape. Within this framework, the EU reported an increase in the efficiency improvement rate this past 2018, however, this improvement remains mediocre when compared to the market capabilities. The global scenario does not appear favourable either, where the International Energy Agency (IEA) pointed out a slowdown in growth for the third consecutive year. This reduction can be followed closely throughout the years in different IEA publications, where data indicates a fall from 3% in 2015 to 1.9% in 2017. These results translate into 40% less CO2 savings in 2018 compared to previous years.  

This drop in efficiency, among other reasons, can be linked to the lack of advancements in energy policy work (In Europe, the efficiency and energy saving objectives for public companies and partners have not changed since 2014). The need for regulations, codes and standards prove to be empirical to comply with the commitments set out in the Paris Agreement. That is why, the increase or reduction of policy coverage should be updated to, not only increase their effectiveness, but also reduce fossil fuel use. 

Amongst the examples of a good policy work worldwide, we can find China, where the initiatives implemented in recent years have increased the levels of efficiency and improved primary energy intensity by 2.9% (2018). However, despite this upgrade, the improvements are not enough to offset the effects of their energy demand, highlighting the further need to promote this field.  

Financial incentives and public investment should also increase in near future if progress towards a sustainable landscape wants to be achieved. Strong investments for the electrification of the industry, as well as energy management technologies, will be essential in this process and must be taken into account.  

According to the "Sustainable Development Scenario" report (IEA), a 13% raise in energy investment, as well as improvements in transport, industry and building efficiency, could lead to renewable sources representing 65% of the world's total electricity in the year 2040. Being wind and solar-photovoltaic energy, 40% of the overall electricity share.  

Additional branches to consider include; the development of hydrogen technologies, which, mixed in the gas supply network, could provide large CO2 reductions; or encouraging the use of nuclear energy, a less popular option, able to make a considerable difference in terms of lowering carbon emissions.  






Global Energy & CO2 Status Report 2018- International Energy Agency  

Sustainable Development Scenario- International Energy Agency  

Shell Sustainability report 2017 & 2018- Royal Dutch Shell  

BP Energy Outlook 2019 edition- British Petroleum  

International Energy Outlook 2017- U.S. Energy Information Administration  

Energy union and climate- European Commission 

Jon Arteta Ibinarriaga's picture
Thank Jon for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member
Spell checking: Press the CTRL or COMMAND key then click on the underlined misspelled word.
Matt Chester's picture
Matt Chester on Apr 16, 2019

These points seem to be echoed a lot by 'naysayers'-- look how CO2 levels are still rising or are at least falling at such a low rate, so what we're doing must not be making an impact. Your article here illustrates that the energy transition mechanisms we've tapped into are making immense strides, it's simply that the challenge we face isn't a stagnant one but rather an ever-growing one

Bob Meinetz's picture
Bob Meinetz on Apr 16, 2019

Matt, immense strides? Though any "reports" from British Petroleum and Royal Dutch Shell will clearly be slanted to further the aims of fossil fuel interests, even the International Energy Agency is not immune to conflicts of interest:

"In a nutshell, the report finds that both of IEA’s scenarios, presented in the EIA’s flagship report World Energy Outlook, envisage continued public funding going to fossil fuels, with investment in oil and gas far exceeding the range of the Paris goals...The report sheds light on another conflict of interest, noting that at least two of the authors of the latest World Economic Outlook were staff on secondment from oil companies, who continued to pay their salaries while they were writing the WEO."

Report: International Energy Agency’s Forecasts Are Misguided and Shaped by Conflicts of Interest

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »