This group brings together the best thinkers on energy and climate. Join us for smart, insightful posts and conversations about where the energy industry is and where it is going.


President Trump's Executive Actions Revive Keystone and Dakota Pipelines's picture

The mission of is to facilitate substantive, responsible dialogue on energy policy issues, and provide this dialogue as a resource for the American people, policymakers, and...

  • Member since 2018
  • 29 items added with 11,574 views
  • Feb 2, 2017

KXLOn the fourth day of his administration, President Trump signed multiple executive actions designed to advance the Keystone XL and Dakota Access pipelines, since related memos specifically invited project developers to re-submit applications for permits and approvals to begin or continue construction. Many view these decisions as a signal the president intends to fulfill campaign promises promoting the oil and gas industries, as described in his America First Energy Plan. Pipeline opponents, however, are already preparing for legal battles seeking to block these projects.

Keystone XL proponents have consistently argued the pipeline will create thousands of good paying jobs while increasing the nation’s energy independence. Environmentalists, however, believe the pipeline only furthers adverse consequences for climate change by enhancing oil and gas use. According to the State Department’s Supplemental EIS, the pipeline in actuality will neither create the suggested long-term economic and jobs impact nor have a significant impact on greenhouse gas emissions.

Dakota Access is more than 90% complete but in late 2016, faced stiff opposition from protesters supporting the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe’s concerns. With only 1,100 feet remaining, project plans would route the pipeline across sacred land as well as underneath Lake Oahe creating water quality concerns. In December, the Army Corps denied a construction permit with Assistant Secretary for Civil Works Jo-Ellen Darcy saying “The best way to complete that work responsibly and expeditiously is to explore alternate routes for the pipeline crossing.” Both pipelines, however, may face permitting and legal challenges that could hold up construction. This is especially true for Keystone which never obtained the requisite permits in Nebraska and could face legal challenges if it relies on eminent domain.

1. How do President Trump’s executive actions forecast U.S. energy policy for the next four years?

2. What is the significance of President Trump’s action on these pipelines?

Original Post's picture
Thank for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member
Spell checking: Press the CTRL or COMMAND key then click on the underlined misspelled word.

No discussions yet. Start a discussion below.

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »