This group brings together the best thinkers on energy and climate. Join us for smart, insightful posts and conversations about where the energy industry is and where it is going.

Post

New Federal Tax Law is a Boon for Electric Utilities, Another Reason Not to Bail Out Ohio's Coal and Nuclear Plants

John Finnigan's picture
Senior Regulatory Attorney EDF

John Finnigan is the senior regulatory attorney for EDF’s US Climate and Energy Program, representing EDF before state public utility commissions on smart grid deployments and energy efficiency...

  • Member since 2016
  • 24 items added with 10,683 views
  • Jan 30, 2018 9:00 am GMT
  • 389 views

Your access to Member Features is limited.

For the past few years, Ohio’s electric utilities have asked state lawmakers and the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) to bail out their old coal and nuclear plants. The storyline is, the power plants are losing money in the competitive wholesale market, so the utilities want customers to subsidize the losses and allow the plants to stay open.

To keep old plants running is throwing good money after bad. And the new federal tax law will give utilities a huge bonanza anyway, so the requested subsidies are even more unnecessary.

Tax breaks and bailouts

The new federal tax law is a jackpot for electric utilities. Congress passed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in late December, reducing the corporate income tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent. For the regulated businesses, the tax cut should benefit customers via lower electricity bills. But for the utilities’ unregulated businesses, the tax cut will benefit the utilities’ shareholders.

This bonus windfall is yet another reason to reject the bailout requests from Ohio’s electric utilities, which have relentlessly tried to make their customers pay for bad business decisions. For example, a group of utilities is trying to get subsidies for its two Ohio Valley Electric Corporation (OVCE) coal plants. These plants, one of which is not even in Ohio, were built in the 1950s and are not needed.

The utilities claim that without subsidies, they would need to close their old plants. But this would be fine. The OVEC plants amount to 2400 MW of electric capacity, while PJM has 18,000 MW under construction and slated to come on line in the next couple of years. In other words, the old, expensive plants are not needed to keep the lights on in Ohio.

Market is working

This is a classic “heads I win, tails you lose” outcome for customers.

Customers shouldn’t be forced to subsidize these plants – the competitive market is working without them. Since 2003, over 32,000 MW – representing mostly old coal plant capacity – have been retired in PJM, the grid-operator region of which Ohio is a part. These plants were primarily replaced by cheaper and cleaner natural gas plants and wind turbines: Ohio has access to abundant, low-cost natural gas supplies from the Marcellus and Utica shale fields, and the state’s wind capacity is growing. (This shift away from carbon-heavy coal also helped propel Ohio to lead the country in reducing carbon emissions, despite a large industrial base.)

At the same time, electricity prices have stayed low. Last year, the wholesale price was the lowest it has ever been since PJM began keeping records in 1999. The U.S. Energy Information Administration also reports that the retail price for electricity in Ohio is below the national average.

No leg to stand on

Ohio utilities, like those in OVEC, want customers to shoulder the burden of their old, money-losing coal and nuclear plants – but the companies haven’t offered to share the huge windfall from the tax cut that benefits their profitable plants. This is a classic “heads I win, tails you lose” outcome for customers.

Ohio’s utilities had only a flimsy case for bailouts before the tax bill. The tax bill is the last nail in the coffin – now they have no case at all. We trust that Ohio’s lawmakers and regulators will take heed.

Original Post

John Finnigan's picture
Thank John for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member
Discussions
Spell checking: Press the CTRL or COMMAND key then click on the underlined misspelled word.
Bob Meinetz's picture
Bob Meinetz on Feb 1, 2018

John, with the resurrection of Vogtle and legislation supporting zero-emission credits, like clockwork, comes labeling of zero-emissions credits for nuclear “bailouts” from the renewables interests – an industry which has been bailed out for the last five decades.

Yet “old” nuclear continues to generate 19% of U.S. electricity with no carbon emissions, 24/7/365, like clockwork. Intermittent renewables generate less than half of that – and because they do it on their schedule, not when it’s needed, they guarantee a place for fossil fuels, to fill in the gaping gaps in generation indefinitely.

Now more than ever, it’s time to abandon anti-science, dreamy visions the sun and wind might be capable of replacing extracted fossil fuel. That will never, ever happen.

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »