- Apr 8, 2022 7:13 pm GMT
CCUS has been described by academics as a costly distraction from mitigating and adapting to climate change. A recent study from Stanford University described CCUS as doing more harm than good by not addressing other pollutants produced by industrial processes. These include sulphur and nitrous oxides. It also noted that the technology is extremely expensive, and stated its implementation does more damage than doing nothing at all with no net social benefit.
No discussions yet. Start a discussion below.
Get Published - Build a Following
The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.
If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.